by: gmataccount123
1 hr
Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Sep 0609:30 AM EDT
-12:30 PM EST
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful EA course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Perfect class schedule and easy course access for working professionals. Class starts Sundays Sept. 6, 2026.
Sep 0201:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
Take 30% off all study plans with code COURSEWORK - Expires on Monday 9/7
Sep 0410:00 AM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
We’ve worked incredibly hard to build TTP into the best test prep experience possible, and it would mean a lot to us to win Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep. If TTP has helped you, we’d be incredibly grateful for your vote.
Sep 0712:01 AM PDT
-11:59 PM PDT
On the 7th, GMAT Club Tests will be Free! Including all the Quizzes, Questions, and Tests. 12 AM - 11:59 PM PDT- Sep 07
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
A complete walkthrough of GMAT Club’s free 12-week GMAT study plan: what you study each week, how progress and goals are tracked, how the error log works, and how your practice unlocks paid tools at no cost. - Sep 09
07:00 AM PDT
-10:00 AM PDT
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway - Sep 09
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Three MBA applications. Three rejections. No interview invites. A year later, Aman was admitted to Cambridge Judge, SMU, and IMD. In this episode of MBA Admit Stories, Aman shares how he rebuilt his MBA application... 
Sep 1507:00 PM EDT
-09:00 PM EST
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Sep 2108:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
Posts: 2
Updated on: 21 Jul 2021, 06:38
Originally posted by Arlene0504 on 25 Sep 2015, 22:31.
Last edited by Bunuel on 21 Jul 2021, 06:38, edited 6 times in total.
Last edited by Bunuel on 21 Jul 2021, 06:38, edited 6 times in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
25%
(medium)
Question Stats:
76% (01:42) correct
24%
(01:54)
wrong
based on 12267
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Prices at the producer level are only 1.3 percent higher now than a year ago and are going down, even though floods in the Midwest and drought in the south are hurting crops and therefore raised corn and soybean prices.
(A) than a year ago and are going down, even though floods in the Midwest and drought in the south are hurting crops and therefore raised
(B) than those of a year ago and are going down, even though floods in the Midwest and drought in the south are hurting crops and therefore raising
(C) than a year ago and are going down, despite floods in the Midwest and drought in the south, and are hurting crops and therefore raising
(D) as those of a year ago and are going down, even though floods in the Midwest and drought in the south hurt crops and therefore raise
(E) as they were a year ago and are going down, despite floods in the Midwest and drought in the south, and are hurting crops and therefore raising
(A) than a year ago and are going down, even though floods in the Midwest and drought in the south are hurting crops and therefore raised
(B) than those of a year ago and are going down, even though floods in the Midwest and drought in the south are hurting crops and therefore raising
(C) than a year ago and are going down, despite floods in the Midwest and drought in the south, and are hurting crops and therefore raising
(D) as those of a year ago and are going down, even though floods in the Midwest and drought in the south hurt crops and therefore raise
(E) as they were a year ago and are going down, despite floods in the Midwest and drought in the south, and are hurting crops and therefore raising
Producer Level
First glance
The first word switches between than and as. The sentence will contain a comparison; should the comparison idiom use than or as?
Issues
(1) Comparison: X higher than Y; X higher as Y
The first three answers use than and the final two use as. Which should it be? Also, check that the comparison is an apples-to-apples comparison.
The correct idiom is either higher than or as high as. This sentence uses higher, so the correct pairing must be than. Eliminate answers (D) and (E).
Prices at the producer level are higher now
(A) than a year ago
(B) than those of a year ago
(C) than a year ago
What are the remaining answers comparing? Answers (A) and (C) compare now to a year ago. Answer (B) compares prices now to those (prices) of a year ago. While it can be acceptable to compare timeframes (as in OG 2017 #772 / OG 2016 #104 “this year” and “last [year]”), the more precise comparison in this problem is between the two prices: prices now versus prices of a year ago.
Answer (B) makes the proper comparison. Eliminate (A) and (C).
(2) Verb / Meaning: are hurting and therefore raised
The sentence is trying to convey a certain sequence of events: floods and drought are hurting crops and therefore causing something else to happen. This second event is caused by the first; therefore, this second event should take place at the same time as or later in time than the first event.
If crops are being hurt right now in the present, then it’s illogical to indicate that the consequence (raised prices) took place in the past. Eliminate answer (A).
(3) Structure / Meaning: and are hurting crops
Answers (C) and (E) both insert an and just before are hurting. What consequences does this have for the sentence structure?
Fix: The core sentences read:
(C) Prices are higher now than a year ago and are hurting crops...
(E) Prices are higher now as they were a year ago and are hurting crops...
In both cases, parallelism dictates that the subject prices must pair with the verb are hurting. In other words, the sentence indicates that the current prices are hurting crops. This is illogical. The floods and drought, not the prices, are hurting crops.
Eliminate answers (C) and (E) for faulty meaning.
The Correct Answer
Correct answer (B) makes a valid comparison between prices now and those (prices) of a year ago. It also clearly conveys the sequence of events: floods...and drought are...hurting crops now, and therefore (are) raising prices (also now).
*Note: the official explanation indicates that the word hurt, in answer (D), is in the simple past. The word hurt can also be simple present: floods and drought hurt crops (today or in general in the present) and therefore raise prices (again, today or in general). Answer (D) is still incorrect, but not for this particular reason stated in the official explanation.
Logical predication; Verb form
The sentence as written makes an illogical comparison between prices at the producer level and a time period (a year ago); surely the intended comparison is between such prices now and those of a year ago. The clause at the end of the sentence states that flooding and a drought are hurting crops, and as a result of this, they have raised prices of certain crops. Are hurting is in the present progressive tense, indicating an ongoing process; raised is in the simple past tense, indicating a completed action. It would be more appropriate to use the present progressive tense here as well, [are] raising.
(D) The comparative adjective higher requires the comparative term than instead of as; the tenses of the verbs in the latter half of the sentence, hurt (simple past) and raise (simple present), do not work together logically.
(A) Comparison (X higher than Y); Verb / Meaning (raised)
(B) CORRECT
(C) Comparison (X higher than Y); Structure / Meaning
(D) Comparison (X higher as Y)
(E) Comparison (X higher as Y); Structure / Meaning
(B) CORRECT
(C) Comparison (X higher than Y); Structure / Meaning
(D) Comparison (X higher as Y)
(E) Comparison (X higher as Y); Structure / Meaning
First glance
The first word switches between than and as. The sentence will contain a comparison; should the comparison idiom use than or as?
Issues
(1) Comparison: X higher than Y; X higher as Y
The first three answers use than and the final two use as. Which should it be? Also, check that the comparison is an apples-to-apples comparison.
The correct idiom is either higher than or as high as. This sentence uses higher, so the correct pairing must be than. Eliminate answers (D) and (E).
Prices at the producer level are higher now
(A) than a year ago
(B) than those of a year ago
(C) than a year ago
What are the remaining answers comparing? Answers (A) and (C) compare now to a year ago. Answer (B) compares prices now to those (prices) of a year ago. While it can be acceptable to compare timeframes (as in OG 2017 #772 / OG 2016 #104 “this year” and “last [year]”), the more precise comparison in this problem is between the two prices: prices now versus prices of a year ago.
Answer (B) makes the proper comparison. Eliminate (A) and (C).
(2) Verb / Meaning: are hurting and therefore raised
The sentence is trying to convey a certain sequence of events: floods and drought are hurting crops and therefore causing something else to happen. This second event is caused by the first; therefore, this second event should take place at the same time as or later in time than the first event.
If crops are being hurt right now in the present, then it’s illogical to indicate that the consequence (raised prices) took place in the past. Eliminate answer (A).
(3) Structure / Meaning: and are hurting crops
Answers (C) and (E) both insert an and just before are hurting. What consequences does this have for the sentence structure?
Fix: The core sentences read:
(C) Prices are higher now than a year ago and are hurting crops...
(E) Prices are higher now as they were a year ago and are hurting crops...
In both cases, parallelism dictates that the subject prices must pair with the verb are hurting. In other words, the sentence indicates that the current prices are hurting crops. This is illogical. The floods and drought, not the prices, are hurting crops.
Eliminate answers (C) and (E) for faulty meaning.
The Correct Answer
Correct answer (B) makes a valid comparison between prices now and those (prices) of a year ago. It also clearly conveys the sequence of events: floods...and drought are...hurting crops now, and therefore (are) raising prices (also now).
*Note: the official explanation indicates that the word hurt, in answer (D), is in the simple past. The word hurt can also be simple present: floods and drought hurt crops (today or in general in the present) and therefore raise prices (again, today or in general). Answer (D) is still incorrect, but not for this particular reason stated in the official explanation.
Logical predication; Verb form
The sentence as written makes an illogical comparison between prices at the producer level and a time period (a year ago); surely the intended comparison is between such prices now and those of a year ago. The clause at the end of the sentence states that flooding and a drought are hurting crops, and as a result of this, they have raised prices of certain crops. Are hurting is in the present progressive tense, indicating an ongoing process; raised is in the simple past tense, indicating a completed action. It would be more appropriate to use the present progressive tense here as well, [are] raising.
(D) The comparative adjective higher requires the comparative term than instead of as; the tenses of the verbs in the latter half of the sentence, hurt (simple past) and raise (simple present), do not work together logically.
If this question felt shaky,
try an adaptive mini quiz of similar problems in
GMAT Club Forum Quiz →. Free plan gives 5 questions per day.
First thing: Please look into transcription; corn and soybean prices should not be underlined.
For those who want to go into the complicated process finding the nuances in meaning created by ellipsis, they can do that; but before that one should ensure that one can eliminate as many choices as possible on grammar alone. IMO, this problem can be easily solved without bothering about the differences in meaning of comparison. We can forthwith dispense with D and E for using the ‘as’ comparator instead of the ‘than’ comparator. Among A, B and C:
A: than a year ago and are going down, even though floods I the Midwest and drought in the south are hurting crops and therefore raised --- are hurting and raised are blatant shift of tense. So gone.
B: than those of a year ago, and are going down, even though floods in the Midwest and drought in the south are hurting crops and therefore raising ---Grammatically good
C: than a year ago and are going down, despite floods in the Midwest and drought in the south, and are hurting crops and therefore raising—This is a fragment; the conjunction ‘and’ creates confusion as to what are hurting crops and raising. They seem to point to the subject the sentence prices at producer level;
As a foot-note, I wish to add a small comment by no less than Ron on this
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/foru ... 32362.html
_________________
For those who want to go into the complicated process finding the nuances in meaning created by ellipsis, they can do that; but before that one should ensure that one can eliminate as many choices as possible on grammar alone. IMO, this problem can be easily solved without bothering about the differences in meaning of comparison. We can forthwith dispense with D and E for using the ‘as’ comparator instead of the ‘than’ comparator. Among A, B and C:
A: than a year ago and are going down, even though floods I the Midwest and drought in the south are hurting crops and therefore raised --- are hurting and raised are blatant shift of tense. So gone.
B: than those of a year ago, and are going down, even though floods in the Midwest and drought in the south are hurting crops and therefore raising ---Grammatically good
C: than a year ago and are going down, despite floods in the Midwest and drought in the south, and are hurting crops and therefore raising—This is a fragment; the conjunction ‘and’ creates confusion as to what are hurting crops and raising. They seem to point to the subject the sentence prices at producer level;
As a foot-note, I wish to add a small comment by no less than Ron on this
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/foru ... 32362.html
Quote:
_________________
Thank you Daagh for your time on GMAT Club and all your contributions! Thank you for everything you did!
Your work will remain a great tribute to you here on GMAT Club!
-bb
Your work will remain a great tribute to you here on GMAT Club!
-bb
Posts: 1,685
Hello Everyone!
This is a great example of a sentence that focuses on idiom structure and comparisons! Let's start by taking a quick look over each option, and highlight any major differences in orange:
Prices at the producer level are only 1.3 percent higher now than a year ago and are going down, even though floods in the Midwest and drought in the south are hurting crops and therefore raised corn and soybean prices.
(A) than a year ago and are going down, even though floods in the Midwest and drought in the south are hurting crops and therefore raised
(B) than those of a year ago and are going down, even though floods in the Midwest and drought in the south are hurting crops and therefore raising
(C) than a year ago and are going down, despite floods in the Midwest and drought in the south, and are hurting crops and therefore raising
(D) as those of a year ago and are going down, even though floods in the Midwest and drought in the south hurt crops and therefore raise
(E) as they were a year ago and are going down, despite floods in the Midwest and drought in the south, and are hurting crops and therefore raising
After a quick glance over the options, a few key differences jump out:
1. than vs. as (idiom structure)
2. a year ago / those of a year ago / they were a year ago (parallelism with comparisons)
3. even though / despite (transitions)
4. raised / raising / raise (verb tense)
Let's start with #1 on our list: than vs. as. No matter which one we choose, it will eliminate 2-3 options rather quickly, so let's start there. This is an issue of idiom structure. Whenever we see comparative language (in this case, the word "higher"), we know that the sentence is comparing two items and must be worded a certain way:
X is higher than Y = CORRECT
X is higher as Y = WRONG
Let's see which options do this correctly, and eliminate the ones that do not:
(A) than a year ago and are going down, even though floods in the Midwest and drought in the south are hurting crops and therefore raised
(B) than those of a year ago and are going down, even though floods in the Midwest and drought in the south are hurting crops and therefore raising
(C) than a year ago and are going down, despite floods in the Midwest and drought in the south, and are hurting crops and therefore raising
(D) as those of a year ago and are going down, even though floods in the Midwest and drought in the south hurt crops and therefore raise
(E) as they were a year ago and are going down, despite floods in the Midwest and drought in the south, and are hurting crops and therefore raising
We can eliminate options D & E because they don't follow the proper "X is higher than Y" idiom structure. That was easy!
Now, let's move on to #2 on our list: parallelism with comparisons. Whenever we compare two items by using the idiom structure "X is higher than Y," the X and Y in the idiom need to be parallel. Let's look at the original sentence closely to determine what two items it's comparing:
Prices at the producer level are only 1.3 percent higher now than a year ago and are going down, even though floods in the Midwest and drought in the south are hurting crops and therefore raised corn and soybean prices.
We can see that the sentence should compare the prices today versus prices from a year ago. Let's make sure each option compares similar things:
(A) than a year ago and are going down, even though floods in the Midwest and drought in the south are hurting crops and therefore raised
This is INCORRECT because it compares the prices today to a year ago, which isn't parallel. You cannot compare prices to years - they're not the same thing!
(B) than those of a year ago and are going down, even though floods in the Midwest and drought in the south are hurting crops and therefore raising
This is CORRECT! The word "those" clearly refers to prices, so this is comparing the prices today to the prices from last year, which is parallel!
(C) than a year ago and are going down, despite floods in the Midwest and drought in the south, and are hurting crops and therefore raising
This is also INCORRECT because it compares prices to years, which aren't parallel items.
There you have it - option B is the correct choice! It's the only one that compares two like items, and it uses the correct idiom structure for comparisons!
Don't study for the GMAT. Train for it.
_________________
This is a great example of a sentence that focuses on idiom structure and comparisons! Let's start by taking a quick look over each option, and highlight any major differences in orange:
Prices at the producer level are only 1.3 percent higher now than a year ago and are going down, even though floods in the Midwest and drought in the south are hurting crops and therefore raised corn and soybean prices.
(A) than a year ago and are going down, even though floods in the Midwest and drought in the south are hurting crops and therefore raised
(B) than those of a year ago and are going down, even though floods in the Midwest and drought in the south are hurting crops and therefore raising
(C) than a year ago and are going down, despite floods in the Midwest and drought in the south, and are hurting crops and therefore raising
(D) as those of a year ago and are going down, even though floods in the Midwest and drought in the south hurt crops and therefore raise
(E) as they were a year ago and are going down, despite floods in the Midwest and drought in the south, and are hurting crops and therefore raising
After a quick glance over the options, a few key differences jump out:
1. than vs. as (idiom structure)
2. a year ago / those of a year ago / they were a year ago (parallelism with comparisons)
3. even though / despite (transitions)
4. raised / raising / raise (verb tense)
Let's start with #1 on our list: than vs. as. No matter which one we choose, it will eliminate 2-3 options rather quickly, so let's start there. This is an issue of idiom structure. Whenever we see comparative language (in this case, the word "higher"), we know that the sentence is comparing two items and must be worded a certain way:
X is higher than Y = CORRECT
X is higher as Y = WRONG
Let's see which options do this correctly, and eliminate the ones that do not:
(A) than a year ago and are going down, even though floods in the Midwest and drought in the south are hurting crops and therefore raised
(B) than those of a year ago and are going down, even though floods in the Midwest and drought in the south are hurting crops and therefore raising
(C) than a year ago and are going down, despite floods in the Midwest and drought in the south, and are hurting crops and therefore raising
(D) as those of a year ago and are going down, even though floods in the Midwest and drought in the south hurt crops and therefore raise
(E) as they were a year ago and are going down, despite floods in the Midwest and drought in the south, and are hurting crops and therefore raising
We can eliminate options D & E because they don't follow the proper "X is higher than Y" idiom structure. That was easy!
Now, let's move on to #2 on our list: parallelism with comparisons. Whenever we compare two items by using the idiom structure "X is higher than Y," the X and Y in the idiom need to be parallel. Let's look at the original sentence closely to determine what two items it's comparing:
Prices at the producer level are only 1.3 percent higher now than a year ago and are going down, even though floods in the Midwest and drought in the south are hurting crops and therefore raised corn and soybean prices.
We can see that the sentence should compare the prices today versus prices from a year ago. Let's make sure each option compares similar things:
(A) than a year ago and are going down, even though floods in the Midwest and drought in the south are hurting crops and therefore raised
This is INCORRECT because it compares the prices today to a year ago, which isn't parallel. You cannot compare prices to years - they're not the same thing!
(B) than those of a year ago and are going down, even though floods in the Midwest and drought in the south are hurting crops and therefore raising
This is CORRECT! The word "those" clearly refers to prices, so this is comparing the prices today to the prices from last year, which is parallel!
(C) than a year ago and are going down, despite floods in the Midwest and drought in the south, and are hurting crops and therefore raising
This is also INCORRECT because it compares prices to years, which aren't parallel items.
There you have it - option B is the correct choice! It's the only one that compares two like items, and it uses the correct idiom structure for comparisons!
Don't study for the GMAT. Train for it.
_________________
EMPOWERgmat
Total GMAT Content & Tactical Training | 120 Point Guarantee | All 6 Official GMAT Tests
empowergmat.com
Total GMAT Content & Tactical Training | 120 Point Guarantee | All 6 Official GMAT Tests
empowergmat.com
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85 
Posts: 3,004
zoezhuyan, I agree with my colleague Ron Purewal (cited above) that the comparisons in A and C aren't necessarily faulty. There are other reasons to eliminate those choices. However, I want to make a slight correction to your analysis above. Your use of "that of" or "those of" in parentheses makes it appear that the implied comparison is between two nouns. Actually, your choices should read ("they were") or ("it was"). The comparison is actually between two adverbial modifiers. Prices are different now than they were last year. This is important because I can't say something like this:
American crows are larger today than in ancient China.
If we filled in "those," this might make sense: "American crows are larger today than those (crows) in ancient China." However, the actual implied meaning here is a comparison between two modifiers: "today" and "in ancient China." "American crows are larger today than (they were) in ancient China." This would make it seem that American crows existed in ancient China!
_________________
American crows are larger today than in ancient China.
If we filled in "those," this might make sense: "American crows are larger today than those (crows) in ancient China." However, the actual implied meaning here is a comparison between two modifiers: "today" and "in ancient China." "American crows are larger today than (they were) in ancient China." This would make it seem that American crows existed in ancient China!
_________________
Manhattan Prep Instructor from 2009-2025
sayantanc2k
Expert
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,391
Location: Germany
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert reply
manhasnoname
The OA compares nouns ( prices now and prices of an year ago.) If the comparison were between clauses , then "they were" would be required. Clause comparison allows omission of repeated parts in some cases, but not in this example. Please see my post above.
Noun comparison: Prices now is higher than prices then.
Clause comparison: Prices are now higher than they were an year ago. (omission not allowed; "were" does not occur elsewhere in the sentence.)
Clause comparison: Prices were higher an year ago than
Quote:
Both sentences are not the same grammatically.
In the first, you compare this year, a noun, with another year, namely last year, another noun.
However, in the second case you are comparing now, an adverb with a year ago, a noun.
_________________
Thank you Daagh for your time on GMAT Club and all your contributions! Thank you for everything you did!
Your work will remain a great tribute to you here on GMAT Club!
-bb
Your work will remain a great tribute to you here on GMAT Club!
-bb
Posts: 6,484
Dear Friends,
Here is a detailed explanation to this question-
Choice A: Option A incorrectly compares "prices" to "a year ago" and does not maintain parallelism between the verbs "are hurting" (present continuous) and "raised" (simple past). Thus, Option A is incorrect.
Choice B: Option B correctly compares "prices" to "those (prices) of a year ago" and maintains proper parallelism and conjunction use throughout the sentence. Thus, Option B is correct.
Choice C: Option C repeats the comparison error displayed in Option A. Thus, Option C is incorrect.
Choice D: Option D uses the conjunction "as"; as this conjunction does not signify contrast, its use alters the meaning of the sentence. This answer choice also fails to maintain parallelism between the verbs "hurt" and "raise". Thus, Option D is incorrect.
Choice E: Option E repeats the conjunction error found in Option D and incorrectly implies that the "prices" are hurting crops. As the phrase "despite floods in the Midwest and drought in the south" is included between two commas, the modifier "and are hurting crops..." will refer to the subject of the previous clause.
Hence, B is the best answer choice.
To understand the concept of “Extra information between Two Commas on GMAT”, you may want to watch the following video (~1 minute):
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
_________________
Here is a detailed explanation to this question-
Arlene0504
Choice A: Option A incorrectly compares "prices" to "a year ago" and does not maintain parallelism between the verbs "are hurting" (present continuous) and "raised" (simple past). Thus, Option A is incorrect.
Choice B: Option B correctly compares "prices" to "those (prices) of a year ago" and maintains proper parallelism and conjunction use throughout the sentence. Thus, Option B is correct.
Choice C: Option C repeats the comparison error displayed in Option A. Thus, Option C is incorrect.
Choice D: Option D uses the conjunction "as"; as this conjunction does not signify contrast, its use alters the meaning of the sentence. This answer choice also fails to maintain parallelism between the verbs "hurt" and "raise". Thus, Option D is incorrect.
Choice E: Option E repeats the conjunction error found in Option D and incorrectly implies that the "prices" are hurting crops. As the phrase "despite floods in the Midwest and drought in the south" is included between two commas, the modifier "and are hurting crops..." will refer to the subject of the previous clause.
Hence, B is the best answer choice.
To understand the concept of “Extra information between Two Commas on GMAT”, you may want to watch the following video (~1 minute):
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
_________________
General Discussion
Posts: 513
I understand what you ask
this the old question, this year and last year are adverb, and they are comparision elements . they shoud be present in both part of comparision and should be paralel.
similarly, prices and those are comparison elemements and they should be present in both parts of comparision and should be paralel.
two questions are similar in that
both comparison elements are present in both parts and paralel.
this the old question, this year and last year are adverb, and they are comparision elements . they shoud be present in both part of comparision and should be paralel.
similarly, prices and those are comparison elemements and they should be present in both parts of comparision and should be paralel.
two questions are similar in that
both comparison elements are present in both parts and paralel.
rohitmanglik
Joined: 24 Jul 2011
Last visit: 22 May 2025
Posts: 124
Location: India
Schools: Tepper '18 McCombs '18 NUS '16
GMAT 1: 570 Q50 V19
GMAT 2: 650 Q49 V28
GMAT 3: 690 Q50 V34
WE:Information Technology (Finance: Investment Banking)
Products:
Hi daagh,
Can you please explain more on how did you eliminate option E for using "as"?
IMO: As needs a clause after it and in this case we have "as they were a year ago".
Kindly help.
_________________
Can you please explain more on how did you eliminate option E for using "as"?
IMO: As needs a clause after it and in this case we have "as they were a year ago".
Kindly help.
daagh
_________________
Middle of nowhere!
My reason for eliminating E is that, ‘higher’ a comparative degree of comparison, requires ‘than’ rather than “as”.
1.3 percent ‘higher now than’ is good. 1.3 percent ‘higher now as’ is incorrect. This is a rule of grammar.
‘As’ can act as a role player, as a preposition and as a conjunction. You require a clause only when it is used as a conjunction. In the other cases, it is followed by nouns. In this stimulus ‘as’ is used a preposition.
_________________
1.3 percent ‘higher now than’ is good. 1.3 percent ‘higher now as’ is incorrect. This is a rule of grammar.
‘As’ can act as a role player, as a preposition and as a conjunction. You require a clause only when it is used as a conjunction. In the other cases, it is followed by nouns. In this stimulus ‘as’ is used a preposition.
_________________
Thank you Daagh for your time on GMAT Club and all your contributions! Thank you for everything you did!
Your work will remain a great tribute to you here on GMAT Club!
-bb
Your work will remain a great tribute to you here on GMAT Club!
-bb
Hi instructors,
comparison is another problem confused me a lot
please help to check whether I am correct:
1/
sales are higher this year than last year -- Correct,
the same as
sales are higher this year than (that of) last year. the comparison is this year's sales and last year's sales.
2/
price is higher this year than last year -- Correct.
the same as
price is higher this year than (that of) last year. the comparison is this year's price and last year's price
3/
price is higher now than a year ago -- Correct
the same as
price is higher now than (that of) a year ago . the comparison is this now - price and a year ago - price
4/
price is 1.3 percentage higher now than a year ago -- Correct
thus, IMO, the comparisons in A and C are correct.
please check.
thanks a lot
have a nice day
>_~
comparison is another problem confused me a lot
please help to check whether I am correct:
1/
sales are higher this year than last year -- Correct,
the same as
sales are higher this year than (that of) last year. the comparison is this year's sales and last year's sales.
2/
price is higher this year than last year -- Correct.
the same as
price is higher this year than (that of) last year. the comparison is this year's price and last year's price
3/
price is higher now than a year ago -- Correct
the same as
price is higher now than (that of) a year ago . the comparison is this now - price and a year ago - price
4/
price is 1.3 percentage higher now than a year ago -- Correct
thus, IMO, the comparisons in A and C are correct.
please check.
thanks a lot
have a nice day
>_~
hi experts,
here is a question,
please check the end of the sentence,corn and soybean prices.
I am curious, why no "corn's and soybean's prices" ?
waiting for your help
thanks a lot
have a nice day
>_~
here is a question,
please check the end of the sentence,corn and soybean prices.
I am curious, why no "corn's and soybean's prices" ?
waiting for your help
thanks a lot
have a nice day
>_~
sayantanc2k
Expert
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,391
Location: Germany
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert reply
zoezhuyan
This usage is alright. It is not a practice to use possessive when referring to price in general, not specifically to that of a particular item.
The oil price has dropped drastically in recent past.... correct. (oil in general)
That doll's price is 10€. ..... correct. (a specific doll)
warriorguy
Retired Moderator
Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Last visit: 08 Feb 2023
Posts: 376
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GPA: 4
WE:Engineering (Telecommunications)
Posts: 376
Can we safely say that the phrase: "higher now than a year ago" in options A and C are not grammatically incorrect?
I saw one of the post wherein it was mentioned that phrase is incorrect. I eliminated both the options based on other grounds.
I saw one of the post wherein it was mentioned that phrase is incorrect. I eliminated both the options based on other grounds.
Posts: 138
DmitryFarber
Going by your logic, OA doesn't make sense, does it?
The choice should have been "than they were ..." . Am I correct?
sayantanc2k
Expert
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,391
Location: Germany
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert reply
warriorguy
Omission is acceptable if:
1. The omitted part is repeated ( i.e. it occurs at least once in the sentence).
2. It does not obscure the meaning.
Here is an example from OG, in which omission was allowed:
in-no-other-historical-sighting-did-halleys-comet-cause-such-24215.html#p157102
If omission is acceptable for such... as.... comparison, it must be logically acceptable for superlative+than comparison as well.
Now coming to this specific example, the complete sentence before omission is:
Prices at the producer level are only 1.3 percent higher now than they were a year ago.
The verb were does not occur anywhere else in the sentence, hence it must be repeated - in this case omission is NOT allowed.
( In the comet example the omitted verb did cause occurs in the sentence - hence omission is allowed.)
Another alternative is to compare the prices (nouns) - the correct choice does noun comparison rather than clause comparison (please see my post below). (For clause comparison, "they were" would be required.)
Posts: 138
sayantanc2k
Makes sense.
Clarification question: Prices "are" higher now than they "were" a year ago is incorrect because "are" is different from "were". Did I get it right?
In other words, what I understood for your explanation is that the same exact verb is allowed to be omitted. Am I right?
Another follow-up question - What is the role played by "of" in the OA?
prices now are higher than those a year ago
vs
prices now are higher than those of a year ago
What is the difference?
Thanks!
sayantanc2k
Expert
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,391
Location: Germany
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert reply
manhasnoname
Prices "are" higher now than they "were" a year ago is CORRECT, but "were" cannot be omitted because "are" is different from "were": Prices "are" higher now than
I do not see any difference between using and not using "of".
Alexey1989x
Joined: 05 Dec 2016
Last visit: 20 May 2023
Posts: 186
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
GMAT 1: 620 Q46 V29
GMAT 1: 620 Q46 V29
Posts: 186
souvik101990
Option B contains a comma before "and" that is incorrect, confirmed with OG 2017 SC no 758.
This comma leads to option "B" be deemed as incorrect because preposition "and" doesn't link two independent clauses.
Option B contains a comma before "and" that is incorrect, confirmed with OG 2017 SC no 758.
This comma leads to option "B" be deemed as incorrect because preposition "and" doesn't link two independent clauses.
Prices at the producer level are only 1.3 percent higher now than a year ago and are going down, even though floods in the Midwest and drought in the south are hurting crops and therefore raised corn and soybean prices.
1) Prices.........are and are going down
2) floods in the Midwest and drought in the south ..........are hurting
Meaning:
Prices are higher this year and are now going down even though floods and drought are hurting crops. This has raised corn and soybean prices.
Error:
Use of 'raised is wrong as this is simple past tense whereas the whole sentence is in present continuous tense. It does make sense.
Option B corrects this error.
Note: 'As' is used to show an extent or degree of something while making comparison. So using 'as' here is non-sensical.
Even though and despite can be used interchangeably.
1) Prices.........are and are going down
2) floods in the Midwest and drought in the south ..........are hurting
Meaning:
Prices are higher this year and are now going down even though floods and drought are hurting crops. This has raised corn and soybean prices.
Error:
Use of 'raised is wrong as this is simple past tense whereas the whole sentence is in present continuous tense. It does make sense.
Option B corrects this error.
Note: 'As' is used to show an extent or degree of something while making comparison. So using 'as' here is non-sensical.
Even though and despite can be used interchangeably.
Moderators:
Announcements
Tuck at Dartmouth
AI at Dartmouth Tuck: How the School Is Preparing Leaders for the Age of Artificial Intelligence
Inside the courses, research, and hands-on learning defining wise, decisive leadership in an AI-driven world.
Read More
Inside the courses, research, and hands-on learning defining wise, decisive leadership in an AI-driven world.
Read More
Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos
Success stories and strategies from high-scoring candidates.