Bunuel
Is xy < 1?
(1) 2/x > 3y
(2) x > 0
Kudos for a correct solution. MANHATTAN GMAT OFFICIAL SOLUTION:Statement (1) might imply that xy < 2/3, but only if x is positive. If it is negative, we would need to flip the sign: xy > 2/3.
Thus we cannot answer the question without knowing the sign of x—information that is provided in Statement (2).
The correct answer is C.These types of questions may have an A or B trap, in that you might fail to realize that you have to set up negative and positive cases when you multiply or divide an inequality by a variable.
Watch out! In some GMAT problems, you
can assume the sign of the variables, because the variables represent countable quantities of physical things. In those cases, you can assume that the variables are positive, and you can cross-multiply inequalities involving those variables at will.