Bookmark
this post
PS17198 wrote:
Quote:
A) what is going on “behind the scenes” can be the creation of a bare-faced look that is just as complicated as a fully made-up one.
This is the rule to use"which" anywhere? or specifica;ly in this condition comma should be there
Correct - Second verb correctly omitted after the use of 'that'.
B) what is going on “behind the scenes” can be the creation of a bare-faced look which is just as complicated as a fully made-up one.
Incorrect - Which should be preceded by a 'comma' in this case.
C) what is going on “behind the scenes” can be the creation of a bare-faced look; as complicated as a fully made-up one.
Incorrect - Incorrect usage of semicolon. Semi colon is used to separate two independent clauses that are very closely related. However, in this case, semi colon precedes a subordinate clause.
D) what is going on “behind the scenes” could be the creation of a bare-faced look that is just as complicated as a fully made-up one.
Incorrect - "Could" does not agree with the verb tense.
E) what goes on “behind the scenes” can be the creation of a bare-faced look which is just as complicated as a fully made-up one.
Incorrect - "What goes on" has a very different meaning. It cannot be substituted for "what is going on". Also, 'which' should be preceded by a 'comma' in this case.
sameeb - Why option B is incorrect ??
"Which" in option B is supposed to follow a comma. "Which" modification needs a comma before which