Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 21:46 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 21:46
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
778,392
 [6]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,392
 [6]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
imeanup
Joined: 15 Jun 2017
Last visit: 17 Sep 2025
Posts: 452
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
Location: India
Posts: 452
Kudos: 607
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
XSatishX
Joined: 05 Jul 2020
Last visit: 17 Nov 2022
Posts: 100
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 36
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, General Management
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GMAT 2: 730 Q48 V41 (Online)
GPA: 3.8
Products:
GMAT 2: 730 Q48 V41 (Online)
Posts: 100
Kudos: 47
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ocelot22
Joined: 16 Oct 2011
Last visit: 24 Sep 2025
Posts: 168
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 545
GMAT 1: 640 Q38 V40
GMAT 2: 650 Q44 V36
GMAT 3: 570 Q31 V38
GMAT 4: 720 Q49 V40
GPA: 3.75
Products:
GMAT 4: 720 Q49 V40
Posts: 168
Kudos: 134
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
What is \(m + n\) ?


(1) \(2^m*3^n = 648\)

(2) \(|m| + |n| = 7\)


Are You Up For the Challenge: 700 Level Questions

(1) 648=2*2*2*3*3*3*3=2^3*3^4 m=3, n=4 sufficient

(2) Let m=3, n=4 |m| +|n| = 3+4 =7 and m=7 as well. Let m=-3 , n=4, |m| +|n| =7, but m+n = 1

Not sufficent. OA is A, 600 level question


If you find my lost helpful, please give me kudos.
Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,392
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ocelot22
Bunuel
What is \(m + n\) ?


(1) \(2^m*3^n = 648\)

(2) \(|m| + |n| = 7\)


Are You Up For the Challenge: 700 Level Questions

(1) 648=2*2*2*3*3*3*3=2^3*3^4 m=3, n=4 sufficient

(2) Let m=3, n=4 |m| +|n| = 3+4 =7 and m=7 as well. Let m=-3 , n=4, |m| +|n| =7, but m+n = 1

Not sufficent. OA is A, 600 level question


If you find my lost helpful, please give me kudos.
Posted from my mobile device

The question is not that easy. ;)
avatar
Deepakjhamb
Joined: 29 Mar 2020
Last visit: 15 Sep 2022
Posts: 218
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Leadership
GPA: 3.96
WE:Business Development (Telecommunications)
Posts: 218
Kudos: 135
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Answer is c since it’s not given that m and n are necessarily integers but if we combined both statements only solution possible would be m= 4 and n = 3

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
TestPrepUnlimited
Joined: 17 Sep 2014
Last visit: 30 Jun 2022
Posts: 1,224
Own Kudos:
1,111
 [2]
Given Kudos: 6
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GRE 1: Q170 V167
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GRE 1: Q170 V167
Posts: 1,224
Kudos: 1,111
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
What is \(m + n\) ?


(1) \(2^m*3^n = 648\)

(2) \(|m| + |n| = 7\)


Note nothing was mentioned about m or n so we cannot assume they are integers.

Statement 1:

This would have infinitely many solutions however only one solution is an integer solution as \(648 = 8*(75+6) = 8*81 = 2^3*3^4\). Insufficient.

Statement 2:

m and n can be both positive or both negative. Insufficient.

Combined:

If both m and n were positive then we'd have m = 3 and n = 4 as a solution. We may try finding another solution, assume m is negative while n is positive. Then \(n - m = 7\) and \(n = m + 7\). Try plugging that into the first equation to see if it makes sense, we'd have:

\(2^m *3^{m + 7} = 2^3*3^4\)
\(6^m=2^3*3^4/3^7=(\frac{2}{3})^3\)

Since the result is a fraction, we can confirm m is a negative number. Then n is a number less than 7, so there is a possible second solution. For this solution, we already have n - m = 7 so n + m cannot be 7. Thus the value of m+n is not known. Insufficient.

(The 2nd solution is roughly m = -0.68 and n = 6.32, try plugging that in the first equation with a calculator!)

Ans: E
User avatar
Pankaj0901
Joined: 18 Dec 2018
Last visit: 17 Dec 2022
Posts: 419
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 737
Location: India
WE:Account Management (Hospitality and Tourism)
Posts: 419
Kudos: 51
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
TestPrepUnlimited
Bunuel
What is \(m + n\) ?


(1) \(2^m*3^n = 648\)

(2) \(|m| + |n| = 7\)


Note nothing was mentioned about m or n so we cannot assume they are integers.

Statement 1:

This would have infinitely many solutions however only one solution is an integer solution as \(648 = 8*(75+6) = 8*81 = 2^3*3^4\). Insufficient.

Statement 2:

m and n can be both positive or both negative. Insufficient.

Combined:

If both m and n were positive then we'd have m = 3 and n = 4 as a solution. We may try finding another solution, assume m is negative while n is positive. Then \(n - m = 7\) and \(n = m + 7\). Try plugging that into the first equation to see if it makes sense, we'd have:

\(2^m *3^{m + 7} = 2^3*3^4\)
\(6^m=2^3*3^4/3^7=(\frac{2}{3})^3\)

Since the result is a fraction, we can confirm m is a negative number. Then n is a number less than 7, so there is a possible second solution. For this solution, we already have n - m = 7 so n + m cannot be 7. Thus the value of m+n is not known. Insufficient.

(The 2nd solution is roughly m = -0.68 and n = 6.32, try plugging that in the first equation with a calculator!)

The solution doesn't look right. Even if m = -0.68 and n = 6.32 make this expression [2^(-0.68)*3^(6.32)] closer to 648, it is not "exactly" equal to 648. Only if this expression gives a value exactly equal 648 for any irrational or fractional values of m or n, should we agree to the fact that m and n can accept more values.

The fractional power of prime numbers, 2 and 3, cannot give an integer value. Hence, answer should be A as the expression can only accept integer values of m (=3) and n (=4) here.


@zhanbo - your views please?

Ans: E
avatar
Deepakjhamb
Joined: 29 Mar 2020
Last visit: 15 Sep 2022
Posts: 218
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Leadership
GPA: 3.96
WE:Business Development (Telecommunications)
Posts: 218
Kudos: 135
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Pankaj0901 -0.68 is just a metaphor that has been used but it proves that some negative number and some postive number exist that can give solution

so considering TestPrepUnlimited solution i would say answer should be e)\

asking Bunuel to confirm
User avatar
Pankaj0901
Joined: 18 Dec 2018
Last visit: 17 Dec 2022
Posts: 419
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 737
Location: India
WE:Account Management (Hospitality and Tourism)
Posts: 419
Kudos: 51
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Deepakjhamb - Not convincing enough that -0.68 is just a metaphor. Could you please suggest some solutions (assuming there are infinite solutions) which would give the value of expression EXACTLY equal to 648?

Not sure if there's something I am missing.

zhanbo VeritasKarishma - Request your views please.

Deepakjhamb
Pankaj0901 -0.68 is just a metaphor that has been used but it proves that some negative number and some postive number exist that can give solution

so considering TestPrepUnlimited solution i would say answer should be e)\

asking Bunuel to confirm
avatar
Deepakjhamb
Joined: 29 Mar 2020
Last visit: 15 Sep 2022
Posts: 218
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Leadership
GPA: 3.96
WE:Business Development (Telecommunications)
Posts: 218
Kudos: 135
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Pankaj0901 - we just need to understand that it can be an irrational number which definitely u can not write without some approx but it does exist , hope this helps

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,392
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Deepakjhamb
Pankaj0901 -0.68 is just a metaphor that has been used but it proves that some negative number and some postive number exist that can give solution

so considering TestPrepUnlimited solution i would say answer should be e)\

asking Bunuel to confirm

Yes, the OA is E. Edited the OA. Thank you.

Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Data Sufficiency (DS) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
Math Expert
105390 posts
GMAT Tutor
1924 posts