Last visit was: 11 Jul 2025, 04:11 It is currently 11 Jul 2025, 04:11
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
generis
User avatar
Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 22 May 2016
Last visit: 18 Jun 2022
Posts: 5,293
Own Kudos:
36,931
 [6]
Given Kudos: 9,464
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,293
Kudos: 36,931
 [6]
Kudos
Add Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
firas92
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 16 Jan 2019
Last visit: 02 Dec 2024
Posts: 617
Own Kudos:
1,652
 [1]
Given Kudos: 142
Location: India
Concentration: General Management
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
WE:Sales (Other)
Products:
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
Posts: 617
Kudos: 1,652
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
J2S2019
Joined: 10 Jan 2017
Last visit: 24 Sep 2022
Posts: 270
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 371
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 270
Kudos: 265
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
generis
User avatar
Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 22 May 2016
Last visit: 18 Jun 2022
Posts: 5,293
Own Kudos:
36,931
 [2]
Given Kudos: 9,464
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,293
Kudos: 36,931
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
firas92
Hi generis,

In the fourth paragraph, the author says "Gustave Herve, another great anti-patriot, justly calls patriotism a superstition" based on which I picked Laudatory

Why can't we disregard neutrality based on the author's use of the word JUSTLY?
firas92 ,

The Aristotle OE says:
"The author does not criticize or praise the anti-patriots, he just states their views. So, the tone can be described as neutral. Hence D is the correct answer."

I've been waiting for challengers.

I can defend the answer -- sort of.

Roughly, in the first part of the passage, the author seems nostalgic about older, almost "untainted" or innocent notions of patriotism.

When he says "the greatest of anti-patriots," (Tolstoy) he means that phrase in a scholarly sense.

In a descriptive sense, I could easily call Ayn Rand "the greatest of the anti-altruists" and then present her views, although I truly believe that her work is philosophically indefensible and that her books' effect is appalling. (I really do.)

Finally, "justly" in a scholarly sense can mean "with good reason," meaning "well-reasoned given the assumptions and theoretical context."

So the author does not quite know which position to take. The best word is "neutral."

On the other hand, I could tear that defense to shreds, quickly, and with plenty of textual support. :-D

SajjadAhmad , I would change this answer to "laudatory." Would you please do so?
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 09 Jul 2025
Posts: 15,828
Own Kudos:
46,353
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6,082
GPA: 3.62
Posts: 15,828
Kudos: 46,353
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Changed it to "laudatory." Option B.

generis
firas92
Hi generis,

In the fourth paragraph, the author says "Gustave Herve, another great anti-patriot, justly calls patriotism a superstition" based on which I picked Laudatory

Why can't we disregard neutrality based on the author's use of the word JUSTLY?
firas92 ,

The Aristotle OE says:
"The author does not criticize or praise the anti-patriots, he just states their views. So, the tone can be described as neutral. Hence D is the correct answer."

I've been waiting for challengers.

I can defend the answer -- sort of.

Roughly, in the first part of the passage, the author seems nostalgic about older, almost "untainted" or innocent notions of patriotism.

When he says "the greatest of anti-patriots," (Tolstoy) he means that phrase in a scholarly sense.

In a descriptive sense, I could easily call Ayn Rand "the greatest of the anti-altruists" and then present her views, although I truly believe that her work is philosophically indefensible and that her books' effect is appalling.

Finally, "justly" in a scholarly sense can mean "with good reason," meaning "well-reasoned given the assumptions and theoretical context."

So the author does not quite know which position to take. The best word is "neutral."

On the other hand, I could tear that defense to shreds, quickly, and with plenty of textual support.

SajjadAhmad , I would change this answer to "laudatory." Would you please do so?
User avatar
generis
User avatar
Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 22 May 2016
Last visit: 18 Jun 2022
Posts: 5,293
Own Kudos:
36,931
 [3]
Given Kudos: 9,464
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,293
Kudos: 36,931
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
J2S2019
generis,

Could you please explain why the tone of the passage towards anti-patriots is Neutral not cynical
J2S2019 , the author is not cynical about the anti-patriots. He is not distrustful of their sincerity. He lays out their beliefs and/or the basis of those beliefs without sounding doubtful.

The author gives a couple of clues, leaving the impression that he approves of the anti-patriots.

For example, the author observes that Herve "justly" [properly, correctly, justifiably] calls patriotism a superstition that is "far more injurious, brutal, and inhumane than religion."

The sentences that follow "justly" are not cynical. If anything, the author is cynical about patriotism.

See paragraph 2. Although we are asked only about the anti-patriots (not mentioned in paragraph 2), after we note the tone in the parts that do mention anti-patriots, we can glean tone from other parts of the passage.

Also, the tone in paragraph 1 is subtly but rhetorically scathing. The author constructs a "straw man" -- he characterizes patriotism in such a way that it is easily assailed.

Patriotism is described as if it were once prefect and glorious. Nothing is (or was) that perfect. He sets up patriotism to take a fall.

At the very least, he respects the anti-patriots. The best answer is "laudatory."

I wonder whether your eyes mistakenly read "patriots" rather than "ANTI-patriots."

Whatever the case, you're engaged with the material. :)

Hope that helps.
User avatar
J2S2019
Joined: 10 Jan 2017
Last visit: 24 Sep 2022
Posts: 270
Own Kudos:
265
 [1]
Given Kudos: 371
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 270
Kudos: 265
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
generis
J2S2019
generis,

Could you please explain why the tone of the passage towards anti-patriots is Neutral not cynical
J2S2019 , the author is not cynical about the anti-patriots. He is not distrustful of their sincerity. He lays out their beliefs and/or the basis of those beliefs without sounding doubtful.

The author gives a couple of clues, leaving the impression that he approves of the anti-patriots.

For example, the author observes that Herve "justly" [properly, correctly, justifiably] calls patriotism a superstition that is "far more injurious, brutal, and inhumane than religion."

The sentences that follow "justly" are not cynical. If anything, the author is cynical about patriotism.

See paragraph 2. Although we are asked only about the anti-patriots (not mentioned in paragraph 2), after we note the tone in the parts that do mention anti-patriots, we can glean tone from other parts of the passage.

Also, the tone in paragraph 1 is subtly but rhetorically scathing. The author constructs a "straw man" -- he characterizes patriotism in such a way that it is easily assailed.

Patriotism is described as if it were once prefect and glorious. Nothing is (or was) that perfect. He sets up patriotism to take a fall.

At the very least, he respects the anti-patriots. The best answer is "laudatory."

I wonder whether your eyes mistakenly read "patriots" rather than "ANTI-patriots."

Whatever the case, you're engaged with the material. :)

Hope that helps.

Thanks a ton for this swift explanation generis :)
User avatar
generis
User avatar
Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 22 May 2016
Last visit: 18 Jun 2022
Posts: 5,293
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9,464
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,293
Kudos: 36,931
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
J2S2019

Thanks a ton for this swift explanation generis :)
You are very welcome. Glad I could help. :)
User avatar
warrior1991
Joined: 03 Mar 2017
Last visit: 03 Feb 2022
Posts: 573
Own Kudos:
433
 [1]
Given Kudos: 596
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Technology
Products:
Posts: 573
Kudos: 433
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
generis
J2S2019
generis,

Could you please explain why the tone of the passage towards anti-patriots is Neutral not cynical
J2S2019 , the author is not cynical about the anti-patriots. He is not distrustful of their sincerity. He lays out their beliefs and/or the basis of those beliefs without sounding doubtful.

The author gives a couple of clues, leaving the impression that he approves of the anti-patriots.

For example, the author observes that Herve "justly" [properly, correctly, justifiably] calls patriotism a superstition that is "far more injurious, brutal, and inhumane than religion."

The sentences that follow "justly" are not cynical. If anything, the author is cynical about patriotism.

See paragraph 2. Although we are asked only about the anti-patriots (not mentioned in paragraph 2), after we note the tone in the parts that do mention anti-patriots, we can glean tone from other parts of the passage.

Also, the tone in paragraph 1 is subtly but rhetorically scathing. The author constructs a "straw man" -- he characterizes patriotism in such a way that it is easily assailed.

Patriotism is described as if it were once prefect and glorious. Nothing is (or was) that perfect. He sets up patriotism to take a fall.

At the very least, he respects the anti-patriots. The best answer is "laudatory."

I wonder whether your eyes mistakenly read "patriots" rather than "ANTI-patriots."

Whatever the case, you're engaged with the material. :)

Hope that helps.



Thanks for a comprehensive explanation. I also marked D as the answer,but after reading your views, I must say laudatory is the best word for this. "Justly" also signifies that author in his tone is sort of agreeing with the anti patriots.

Thanks for this insight. It could not have been explained better. You are a gem. Woahhhh.
User avatar
dabaobao
Joined: 24 Oct 2016
Last visit: 20 Jun 2022
Posts: 572
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 143
GMAT 1: 670 Q46 V36
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V38
GMAT 3: 690 Q48 V37
GMAT 4: 710 Q49 V38 (Online)
GMAT 4: 710 Q49 V38 (Online)
Posts: 572
Kudos: 1,555
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Took 6:30 min in total including 3:30 min to read.

Passage Map:


1) What is patriotism? Birthplace?
2) Patriotism != Birthplace
3) Patriotism = An tool for murderers?
4) Patriotism = Superstition > Religion?
User avatar
Skywalker18
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Last visit: 15 Nov 2023
Posts: 2,052
Own Kudos:
9,684
 [1]
Given Kudos: 171
Status:Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
Posts: 2,052
Kudos: 9,684
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
All correct in 7 mins 30 seconds, including 3 mins 45 seconds to read.
Para 1- patriotism definition- is it love for the spot, every inch representing dear and precious recollections of a happy, joyous, and playful childhood?
Para 2- definition in previous para is NOT patriotism
Para 3- Tolstoy's definition- principle that will justify the training of wholesale murderers
Para 4- Herve- patriotism a superstition- far more injurious, brutal, and inhumane than religion.

1. The primary purpose of the passage is to:
(E) state that an earlier definition of a term may not apply anymore and search for an alternative definition - Correct
If that were patriotism, few American men of today could be called upon to be patriotic, since the place of play has been turned into factory, mill, and mine, while deafening sounds of machinery have replaced the music of the birds.
Then author looks for alternative definitions in para 3 and 4


2. The passage suggests which of the following about anti-patriots?
(D) They primarily defined patriotism in the negative sense - Correct

3. The passage does NOT mention which of the following about patriotism?

(A) Patriotism may be the love for one’s birthplace. - incorrect- refer to para 1
(B) The earlier definition of patriotism would not apply to many modern Americans. - incorrect- refer to para 2
(C) Leo Tolstoy was the greatest anti-patriot of all times. - Correct; Leo Tolstoy, the greatest anti-patriot of our times, (OUR != ALL)
(D) People have contrasting views on patriotism. - incorrect
(E) Patriotism can in some way be used to justify mass killing of people. - incorrect,
Leo Tolstoy, the greatest anti-patriot of our times, defines patriotism as the principle that will justify the training of wholesale murderers

4. The tone of the passage towards anti-patriots can best be described as:
(B) Laudatory

Gustave Herve, another great anti-patriot, justly calls patriotism a superstition—one far more injurious, brutal, and inhumane than religion.
User avatar
Kartik2121
Joined: 16 Jan 2023
Last visit: 10 Jun 2025
Posts: 48
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 70
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q82 V85 DI78
GMAT 1: 620 Q44 V31
GMAT 2: 680 Q47 V37
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q82 V85 DI78
GMAT 2: 680 Q47 V37
Posts: 48
Kudos: 20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
What are some “EXPERTS” doing here? The word justly alone cannot make the tone of the passage towards anti-patriots as “Laudatory”. There is no “praise” or “commendation “ offered by the author. He merely shows an inclination towards patriotism being a superstition, but does not incline towards praising the anti-patriots. The OE should still the same: that is, the tone is neutral towards anti-patriots.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,437
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,437
Kudos: 953
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7349 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
15828 posts