Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 09:43 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 09:43
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,389
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,389
Kudos: 778,288
 [50]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
44
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
MissBong
Joined: 02 Apr 2021
Last visit: 15 Jan 2025
Posts: 56
Own Kudos:
45
 [3]
Given Kudos: 167
Location: India
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38 (Online)
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38 (Online)
Posts: 56
Kudos: 45
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sony1000
Joined: 31 May 2015
Last visit: 14 Nov 2025
Posts: 206
Own Kudos:
298
 [1]
Given Kudos: 220
Location: Fiji
Schools: IE
GPA: 1
Schools: IE
Posts: 206
Kudos: 298
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Gio96
Joined: 27 Jan 2021
Last visit: 01 Apr 2025
Posts: 36
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 56
Posts: 36
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi team,

I'm not clear with E. Where the passage is evaluating the accuracy of BF1? The passage is evaluating whether some conclusions can be derived or not, but the findings are not argued in my opinion. Could someone clarify?

Regards.
User avatar
grindingtedd
Joined: 22 Apr 2021
Last visit: 30 Oct 2022
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
4
 [2]
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 5
Kudos: 4
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Gio96
Hi team,

I'm not clear with E. Where the passage is evaluating the accuracy of BF1? The passage is evaluating whether some conclusions can be derived or not, but the findings are not argued in my opinion. Could someone clarify?

Regards.

Hi, here is my reasoning for E,

The none bolded parts of the argument essentially provided rationales for why when insurance company compensates stolen items (people lies, no evidence). And it evaluates the validity of the provided evidence in BF1, saying it "does not establish the conclusion most frequently drawn: that these claims losses are generally fraudulent"
User avatar
Gio96
Joined: 27 Jan 2021
Last visit: 01 Apr 2025
Posts: 36
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 56
Posts: 36
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
grindingtedd
Gio96
Hi team,

I'm not clear with E. Where the passage is evaluating the accuracy of BF1? The passage is evaluating whether some conclusions can be derived or not, but the findings are not argued in my opinion. Could someone clarify?

Regards.

Hi, here is my reasoning for E,

The none bolded parts of the argument essentially provided rationales for why when insurance company compensates stolen items (people lies, no evidence). And it evaluates the validity of the provided evidence in BF1, saying it "does not establish the conclusion most frequently drawn: that these claims losses are generally fraudulent"

I preferred D over E since the word implication does not necessarily mean a consequence, but also it means allusion, hint, ecc..(or in other word, words that express the "inferred meaning"). As you said, the author is evaluating whether or not with BF1 we can draw or not some conclusions (that is, that these claims losses are generally fraudulent). Choice E IMO seems to go against the findings itself and not the possible inferences that can be made.
avatar
GmatStruggle2021
Joined: 20 Dec 2021
Last visit: 17 Oct 2022
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
Posts: 4
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Gio96
grindingtedd
Gio96
Hi team,

I'm not clear with E. Where the passage is evaluating the accuracy of BF1? The passage is evaluating whether some conclusions can be derived or not, but the findings are not argued in my opinion. Could someone clarify?

Regards.

Hi, here is my reasoning for E,

The none bolded parts of the argument essentially provided rationales for why when insurance company compensates stolen items (people lies, no evidence). And it evaluates the validity of the provided evidence in BF1, saying it "does not establish the conclusion most frequently drawn: that these claims losses are generally fraudulent"

I preferred D over E since the word implication does not necessarily mean a consequence, but also it means allusion, hint, ecc..(or in other word, words that express the "inferred meaning"). As you said, the author is evaluating whether or not with BF1 we can draw or not some conclusions (that is, that these claims losses are generally fraudulent). Choice E IMO seems to go against the findings itself and not the possible inferences that can be made.

The problem with D is that it states the first statement is a finding that is at issue in the argument, which I feel is clearly wrong. It is actually the reverse, the argument is trying to support/evaluate that evidence (mentioned in option E). Additionally, the first and second statement move the argument in the same direction (which D opposes). Hope this helps :)
User avatar
sahibbajaj
Joined: 04 Apr 2021
Last visit: 25 Dec 2023
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 2
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
please explain me why answer is E and not D.
User avatar
ReedArnoldMPREP
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 30 Apr 2021
Last visit: 20 Dec 2024
Posts: 521
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 37
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V47
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V47
Posts: 521
Kudos: 536
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sahibbajaj
please explain me why answer is E and not D.

I believe this is in error, and the correct answer is 'D.' This problem is clearly very closely based on an official problem, for which the correct answer is D.
User avatar
samarpan.g28
Joined: 08 Dec 2023
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 324
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,236
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Human Resources
GPA: 8.88
WE:Engineering (Technology)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
When an auto insurance policy compensates the owners of stolen or burglarized cars for not only any physical damage to their vehicles, but also the loss of property that had been present within, victims claim nearly three times the material losses that they do when an insurer compensates only for physical damage. Because the evidence in these cases has, by definition, been stolen, there are few objective means to determine whether the victim actually incurred the material losses claimed. But these facts do not establish the conclusion most frequently drawn: that these claimed losses are generally fraudulent. Clearly, when an insurance policy does not provide compensation for items stolen from a car, people have little incentive to report such a loss.

In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?


A. The first is a claim that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that claim.

B. The first is a claim that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusion.

C. The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion for which the argument provides further evidence; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.

D. The first is a finding whose implications are at issue in the argument; the second is a claim presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that finding.

E. The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence presented to establish that the finding is accurate.

"Because the evidence in these cases has, by definition, been stolen, there are few objective means to determine whether the victim actually incurred the material losses claimed." This sounds problematic if we refer to the first boldface.
The second boldface further bolsters the above sentence and goes against the first boldface i.e. arguing to find implication from the first boldface. Therefore (D) is correct.
User avatar
Kindred17spirit
Joined: 05 Sep 2018
Last visit: 25 Oct 2025
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 98
Posts: 10
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can anyone explain why C is incorrect?
Bunuel
When an auto insurance policy compensates the owners of stolen or burglarized cars for not only any physical damage to their vehicles, but also the loss of property that had been present within, victims claim nearly three times the material losses that they do when an insurer compensates only for physical damage. Because the evidence in these cases has, by definition, been stolen, there are few objective means to determine whether the victim actually incurred the material losses claimed. But these facts do not establish the conclusion most frequently drawn: that these claimed losses are generally fraudulent. Clearly, when an insurance policy does not provide compensation for items stolen from a car, people have little incentive to report such a loss.

In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?


A. The first is a claim that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that claim.

B. The first is a claim that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusion.

C. The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion for which the argument provides further evidence; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.

D. The first is a finding whose implications are at issue in the argument; the second is a claim presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that finding.

E. The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence presented to establish that the finding is accurate.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts