OFFICIAL EXPLANATIONProject SC Butler: Sentence Correction (SC1)
THE PROMPTQuote:
When coins were made of silver, their size and weight were in direct proportion to their face value; therefore, the half dollar was necessarily twice as big as the quarter.
THE OPTIONSQuote:
A) the half dollar was necessarily twice as big as the quarter
• although the phrase "twice as big" may sound strange, it is okay because it refers to the
size of the coins, a fact that is mentioned in the first part of the sentence
• hmm -
weight is left out of the comparison.
→ a better construction would state, ". . . the half dollar was necessarily twice as big and twice as heavy as the quarter."
→ this omission is not a huge error and the other options contain the same omission
• I do not see any other errors
KEEP A
Quote:
B) half dollars were necessarily twice larger than quarters
•
twice larger than is unidiomatic.
→ In order to make correct comparisons, we need
twice as large as •
twice larger than is also illogical.
Twice means
-- adverb: "on two occasions" (
I read the book twice, in which
twice modifies the
verb "read," not the
noun "book")
"Larger" is not a verb.
-- adverb: doubled in quantity or degree (
She owns twice as many books as he owns. Now twice modifies "many," which is a quantity. Larger is not a quantity.
Nor is
larger a standalone degree, which would be written this way:
Twice as strong as. Twice as many as.ELIMINATE B
Quote:
C) half dollars were necessarily twice larger than that of the quarter
•
twice larger than is incorrect, just as it is in (B)
•
that just makes a bigger mess of
twice larger than. Even if the latter were comprehensible, what does
that refer to? Size? Weight? Neither? Both? Whatever, the use of
that is wrong.
• half dollars (plural) and the quarter (singular) are not truly parallel.
→ we need
half dollars and
quarters OR
the half dollar and
the quarter (in the latter, "the" stands for the whole category of "quarters")
→ SC questions contain this subtle lack of parallelism on occasion; watch for it.
ELIMINATE C
Quote:
D) it was necessary that half dollars were twice as much as quarters
•
it was necessary that is hella awkward and probably ungrammatical because that phrasing typically requires command subjunctive
→ IT + WAS + [bossy adjective] + THAT + subject + bare infinitive (base form of verb)
Correct:
It was necessary that he fill out papers to obtain a work visa.Correct:
It was imperative that she report the crime she witnessed.•
twice as much as is nonsensical: what does "much" refer to? The quarters? Their size? Weight?
ELIMINATE D
Quote:
E) quarters were necessarily half as big as the half dollar
• this option switches the order of the quarter and half dollar in the comparison and uses different but correct math—
this rearrangement is perfectly fine.Logically, the sentences are identical.
• The problem? Plural
quarters and singular
the half dollar are not parallel.
ELIMINATE E
COMMENTSmcmoorthy and
vivekdixit07 , welcome to SC Butler.
These answers are mostly excellent and mostly spot-on.
(Small reminder that applies in a couple of places: explain.)
Nice work.
Happy New Year, everyone!