GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 20 Mar 2019, 00:20

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then aske

Author Message
Intern
Joined: 12 Sep 2009
Posts: 13
When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then aske  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Dec 2009, 11:48
1
00:00

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

74% (00:42) correct 26% (01:25) wrong based on 54 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist, they reply, "No." Some theorists try to explain this result by arguing that the selves of hypnotized subjects are dissociated into separate parts, and that the part that is deaf is dissociated from the part that replies.

Which of the following challenges indicates the most serious weakness in the attempted explanation described above?

(A) Why does the part that replies not answer, "Yes"?

(B) Why are the observed facts in need of any special explanation?

(C) Why do the subjects appear to accept the hypnotist's suggestion that they are deaf?

(D) Why do hypnotized subjects all respond the same way in the situation described?

(E) Why are the separate parts of the self the same for all subjects?

Sorry if I'm reposting this same question ... I need a simple tactic/methodology to tackle these kind of questions.

When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist, they reply, “No.” Some theorists try to explain this result by arguing that the selves of hypnotized subjects are dissociated into separate parts, and that the part that is deaf is dissociated from the part that replies.
Which of the following challenges indicates the most serious weakness in the attempted explanation
described above?
(A) Why does the part that replies not answer, “Yes”?
(B) Why are the observed facts in need of any special explanation?
(C) Why do the subjects appear to accept the hypnotist’s suggestion that they are deaf?
(D) Why do hypnotized subjects all respond the same way in the situation described?
(E) Why are the separate parts of the self the same for all subjects?

OA : A
Intern
Joined: 30 Aug 2009
Posts: 46
Location: LA
Re: When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then aske  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Dec 2009, 21:44
Honestly, it's a real tough one.
I will wait along with you for someone to provide a nice explanation and how to approach for these kind of questions.
_________________

---------------------------------------------------------------
Check-out the following:
---------------------------------------------------------------
1. Math Divisibility Test

Intern
Joined: 24 Jun 2009
Posts: 45
Re: When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then aske  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Dec 2009, 00:52
seluka wrote:
Sorry if I'm reposting this same question ... I need a simple tactic/methodology to tackle these kind of questions.

When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist, they reply, “No.” Some theorists try to explain this result by arguing that the selves of hypnotized subjects are dissociated into separate parts, and that the part that is deaf is dissociated from the part that replies.
Which of the following challenges indicates the most serious weakness in the attempted explanation
described above?
(A) Why does the part that replies not answer, “Yes”?
(B) Why are the observed facts in need of any special explanation?
(C) Why do the subjects appear to accept the hypnotist’s suggestion that they are deaf?
(D) Why do hypnotized subjects all respond the same way in the situation described?
(E) Why are the separate parts of the self the same for all subjects?

That is a tough one. Here is why I think it is A:
The correct answer must challenge the theorists' theory. Theorist explain the hypnotized subject has two selves or parts: One that is deaf and the other one. (A) is asking if it is true that there are two parts and the part that replies is not the deaf part then why does this part not answer for itself by saying that it can hear? This is the only option that directly challenges the theory.
Manager
Status: I am Midnight's Child !
Joined: 04 Dec 2009
Posts: 97
WE 1: Software Design and Development
Re: When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then aske  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Dec 2009, 08:13
When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist, they reply, “No.” Some theorists try to explain this result by arguing that the selves of hypnotized subjects are dissociated into separate parts, and that the part that is deaf is dissociated from the part that replies.
Which of the following challenges indicates the most serious weakness in the attempted explanation
described above?
(A) Why does the part that replies not answer, “Yes”?
(B) Why are the observed facts in need of any special explanation?
(C) Why do the subjects appear to accept the hypnotist’s suggestion that they are deaf?
(D) Why do hypnotized subjects all respond the same way in the situation described?
(E) Why are the separate parts of the self the same for all subjects?

I think it has to be A. Well, here's my reason

If the two dissociated parts are indeed separate then why does it listen him in the first place(Hypnotized patients already) and accordingly provide a reply. It can provide any reply Yes or No but since it always provides No, it means that both parts are not completely seperate and are connected. Hence, A
_________________

Argument : If you love long trips, you love the GMAT.
Conclusion : GMAT is long journey.

What does the author assume ?
Assumption : A long journey is a long trip.

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Manager
Joined: 10 Nov 2008
Posts: 88
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
Re: When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then aske  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Dec 2009, 09:25

The theory of the 2 selves has not explained how one of the selves takes control over the other.

The self which is hearing the question should have answered: Yes.
Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 165
Re: When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then aske  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Dec 2009, 09:54
I got A through POE. I agree with all the explanations though. If the two selves are separate then when does one self give an answer that corresponds with what the other half is being told.
Senior Manager
Joined: 23 May 2010
Posts: 264
Re: When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then aske  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Aug 2010, 19:57
i picked A>..( glad that we have POE)...power of elimination ....

Logic explained by friends ....regards
Manager
Joined: 14 Jun 2010
Posts: 199
Re: When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then aske  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Aug 2010, 22:19
For me it was down to A or D and I chose A
Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Posts: 133
WE 1: 4 years Software Product Development
WE 2: 3 years ERP Consulting
Re: When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then aske  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Aug 2010, 00:12
The OA is A. Attached is the explanation from OG.
Attachments

File comment: I looked up the question and this came up on books.google.com. the OA is A

Image.JPG [ 54.17 KiB | Viewed 5791 times ]

_________________

Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 725
Location: Singapore
Concentration: General Management, Finance
Schools: Chicago Booth - Class of 2015
Re: When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then aske  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Aug 2010, 07:50
1
When GMAT builds a formidable question, answers are simple. This question demonstrates how easily you can discover that simple answer. . Start with A and then D and E. Don't start elimination from the middle. If you overuse POE more than twice you are dead wrong. This may be over simplification though.

seluka wrote:
Can somebody explain ?
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Jun 2009
Posts: 280
Location: USA
WE 1: Engineering
Re: When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then aske  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2010, 08:18
"A" is right. POE will be helpful. However, I will try to explain what helped me.

Analyze the attempted explanation and narrow down to the real meat of the explanation - "....the part that is deaf is dissociated from the part that replies". Per the explanation, the deaf part is not connected to the part that is answering. Hence, the part that is answering is NOT deaf. Therefore, it should have answered YES (for the explanation to be true.
_________________

All things are possible to those who believe.

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 53716
Re: When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then aske  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jan 2019, 06:07
seluka wrote:
When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist, they reply, "No." Some theorists try to explain this result by arguing that the selves of hypnotized subjects are dissociated into separate parts, and that the part that is deaf is dissociated from the part that replies.

Which of the following challenges indicates the most serious weakness in the attempted explanation described above?

(A) Why does the part that replies not answer, "Yes"?

(B) Why are the observed facts in need of any special explanation?

(C) Why do the subjects appear to accept the hypnotist's suggestion that they are deaf?

(D) Why do hypnotized subjects all respond the same way in the situation described?

(E) Why are the separate parts of the self the same for all subjects?

Sorry if I'm reposting this same question ... I need a simple tactic/methodology to tackle these kind of questions.

When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist, they reply, “No.” Some theorists try to explain this result by arguing that the selves of hypnotized subjects are dissociated into separate parts, and that the part that is deaf is dissociated from the part that replies.
Which of the following challenges indicates the most serious weakness in the attempted explanation
described above?
(A) Why does the part that replies not answer, “Yes”?
(B) Why are the observed facts in need of any special explanation?
(C) Why do the subjects appear to accept the hypnotist’s suggestion that they are deaf?
(D) Why do hypnotized subjects all respond the same way in the situation described?
(E) Why are the separate parts of the self the same for all subjects?

OA : A

OPEN DISCUSSION OF THIS QUESTION IS HERE: https://gmatclub.com/forum/when-hypnoti ... 02273.html
_________________
Re: When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then aske   [#permalink] 14 Jan 2019, 06:07
Display posts from previous: Sort by