|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
18 Feb 2026, 20:00
Kudos
Bookmarks
C
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
35%
(medium)
Question Stats:
77% (01:53) correct
23%
(01:49)
wrong
based on 203
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
When it comes to purity standards in the food industry, demanding the most exacting results that the best hygiene practices can achieve is unwise. Although contemporary hygiene practices can isolate and eliminate the most minute amounts of impurities, doing so is exorbitantly expensive, with respect to the improvement achieved. Thus, it would be more reliable to set standards by accounting for all current and future risks involved than by demanding the best hygiene practices
The argument given concerning the better way to set standards assumes that
A. at present, the food industry meets the standards established by public health authorities
B. the only impurities worth gauging are introduced by the food industry
C. all of the relevant risks posed by allowing different levels of impurities can be accounted for effectively
D. preventing vast quantities of impurities from entering the food supply chain is not expensive
E. minuscule amounts of some impurities can be toxic
The argument given concerning the better way to set standards assumes that
A. at present, the food industry meets the standards established by public health authorities
B. the only impurities worth gauging are introduced by the food industry
C. all of the relevant risks posed by allowing different levels of impurities can be accounted for effectively
D. preventing vast quantities of impurities from entering the food supply chain is not expensive
E. minuscule amounts of some impurities can be toxic
arushi118
Joined: 21 Jul 2024
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 266
Given Kudos: 894
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, General Management
Schools: INSEAD Aug '26 LBS '26 Kellogg '26
GPA: 8.2/10
Products:
19 Feb 2026, 00:53
Kudos
Bookmarks
Correct Answer is C
It says that all the relevant risks can be accounted for effectively. If this is not true then it will break the conclusion as if we have an impurity which poses a high risk but is not accounted for effectively, then this method of setting up the standard will not be reliable.
It says that all the relevant risks can be accounted for effectively. If this is not true then it will break the conclusion as if we have an impurity which poses a high risk but is not accounted for effectively, then this method of setting up the standard will not be reliable.
19 Feb 2026, 05:45
Kudos
Bookmarks
C - Since it tell you exactly that risks can be accounted for and hence as per the paragraph, corresponding action can be undertaken.
