Gnpth wrote:
Whether they will scale back their orders to pre-2003 levels or stop doing business with us altogether depends on whether the changes that their management has proposed will be fully implemented.
A. Whether they will scale back their orders to pre-2003 levels or stop doing business with us altogether depends on whether the changes that their management has proposed will be fully implemented.
B. Whether they scale back their orders to pre-2003 levels or whether they discontinue their business with us altogether depends on the changes their management has proposed, if fully implemented or not.
C. Their either scaling back their orders in the future to pre-2003 levels, or their outright termination of business with us, depends on their management’s proposed changes being fully implemented or not.
D. Whether they will scale back their orders to pre-2003 levels or stop doing business with us altogether depends if the changes that their management has proposed become fully implemented.
E. They will either scale back their orders to pre-2003 levels, or they will stop doing business with us altogether dependent on whether the changes their management has proposed will be fully implemented, or not.
Hi
rocko911 and
raffamaidenMy two cents:
1. The question does not seem very GMAT like. The reason I say this is that GMAT questions don't
usually have correct answers that have pronouns such as "they" and "us" without actual nouns that such pronouns refer to. Also, I am not a 100% happy with how the correct answer is constructed - particularly the latter part (again - could be wrong here). However, to keep the discussion pertinent to the thread, I will comment on some of the questions asked.
2. For
rocko911 : Meaning wise, the first
whether scenario has two distinct outcomes related with it. So, the two outcomes are:
a. Company may scale back
b. Company may stop doing business with the concerned party altogether
As you can see, the second outcome (outcome b) is very specific in nature. You cannot understand/or think about this outcome unless it is specifically expressed.
However, with the second use of
whether, the second outcome is more or less understood. So, what are the two outcomes for the second
whether:
a. changes are fully implemented
b. changes are not fully implemented
So, the answer to your question about the usage of "or" with the first
whether is that the author of the sentence wanted to give us the second outcome clearly as it cannot be understood automatically. However, with the second one, the alternate scenario is quite clear and hence does not need to be stated explicitly. For example:
1. Whether he gets the job or is wait-listed for the position is irrelevant to his friends.
2. Whether he gets the job (or he does not get the job) is irrelevant to his friends.
As you can see, in the first case, the "waitlist" part couldn't have been understood had the author not mentioned it explicitly. However, in the second sentence, the "or not" part is understood. Of course, the two sentences above mean entirely different things. So, one cannot say that the second sentence is a better or more concise version of the first one.
To sum it with a bit of humor, whether the author uses the "or" part in a
whether construction usually depends on whether the "or" part adds something else to the meaning of the sentence.
3. For
raffamaiden:
Whether and
If cannot be used interchangeably on the GMAT. It's not about preference, it's about the intended meaning. If you want to convey choices/alternate scenarios, please use "whether". If you want to convey outcomes of a particular circumstance, use "if". Let's take a scenario that we will exploit one time by using "if" and one time by using "whether".
a.
If he calls me, I will talk to him. - Concentrate on the "if" part. In the "if" portion, he DOES call me. There is no other condition.
b.
My talking to him depends on whether he calls me (or not). - Concentrate on the "whether" part. In the whether portion, there are two scenarios implied - he does call me and he does NOT call me.
I hope the above discussion helps.

Cheers!
NS