Thanks for the answers but I think you didn't understand my question.
I was wondering why can't we flip the the answers in "weaken the argument" questions. Meaning, why not to flip some possible answer and if it strengths the argument (like in "strengthen the argument" questions when we flip we look for the answer which weaken the argument) then it's the correct answer.
For example - OG 2017 New Question
Fast-food restaurants make up 45 percent of all restaurants in Cantaria. Customers at these restaurants tend to be young; in fact, studies have shown that the older people get, the less likely they are to eat in fast-food restaurants. Since the average age of the Canatrian population is gradually rising and will continue to do so, the number of fast-food restaurants is likely to decrease.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
(A) Fast-food restaurants in Canatria are getting bigger, so each one can serve more customers.
(B) Some older people eat at fast-food restaurants more frequently than the average young person.
(C) Many people who rarely eat in fast-food restaurants nevertheless eat regularly in restaurants.
(D) The overall population of Canatria is growing steadily.
(E) As the population of Canatria gets older, more people are eating at home.
The answer is D and indeed if we flip answer D we get - The overall population of Canatria is not growing steadily.
This flipped sentence is strengthening the argument because if the overall population doesn't grow then the average age rises and, and because older people tend to less eat at fast food restaurants then the number of fast food is likely to decreade.
My question, of course, is in general, why can't we always use this technique for "weaken the argument" questions.