Last visit was: 09 Jul 2025, 11:49 It is currently 09 Jul 2025, 11:49
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
alimad
Joined: 10 Feb 2006
Last visit: 09 Jul 2014
Posts: 466
Own Kudos:
4,240
 [31]
Posts: 466
Kudos: 4,240
 [31]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
28
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
laxieqv
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Last visit: 24 Jun 2011
Posts: 831
Own Kudos:
Posts: 831
Kudos: 1,514
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
lnaik
Joined: 13 Jul 2007
Last visit: 04 Dec 2007
Posts: 94
Own Kudos:
Posts: 94
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GMATBLACKBELT
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Last visit: 03 Jun 2013
Posts: 1,139
Own Kudos:
Posts: 1,139
Kudos: 1,839
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
alimad
Wind farms, which generate electricity using arrays of thousands of wind-powered
turbines, require vast expanses of open land. County X and County Y have similar
terrain, but the population density of County X is significantly higher than that of County
Y. Therefore, a wind farm proposed for one of the two counties should be built in
County Y rather than in County X.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the planner’s argument?
A. County X and County Y are adjacent to each other, and both are located in the
windiest area of the state.
B. The total population of County Y is substantially greater than that of County X.
C. Some of the electricity generated by wind farms in County Y would be purchased
by users outside the county.
D. Wind farms require more land per unit of electricity generated than does any other
type of electrical-generation facility.
E. Nearly all of County X’s population is concentrated in a small part of the county,
while County Y’s population is spread evenly throughout the country.


I can only see E because none of the other answers seriously undermines the argument. I'll wait for your comments.


This is C.

X's population is denser. Thus, Wind farms should be built in Y.

A: Irrelevant
B: This is tempting but doesn't really explain why the mill's should not be built in Y. This requires us to make additional assumptions about greater population.
D: Doesn't weaken, both have the same land mass.

E. Says that population is very dense in one spot for X, but Y is spread out.
Just think of any state with a mega-major city: Illinois . Has Chicago and... thats about it. Chicago contains the majority of the population of Illinois. Now lets compare to say Ohio. Ohio has several major cities, but nothing compared to Chicago. And Ohio's pop is about equal but spread out. Assuming both have same land mass, its easy to see why Ohio would be a worse place to put wind mills.


Now judging from your comments, I can see that E is probably not the answer.

So I say C. The argument assumes that electricity will be purchased outside of Y. I thought this might be something that COULD weaken the argument, but this doesn't really follow the premises as E does. E perfectly explains why its not a good idea to put the mills in Y.

However, we must remember that when weakening the argument, we have to look for two types of choices: one that produces a piece of weakening evidence or one that exposes a faulty assumption.

The argument assumes that both countries will share electricity. This is why choice C is correct.


However, come test day Id still say E. Both are plausible. I guess E just requires us to assume that sparse population means worse for windmilss. This is a very iffy CR if you ask me.


Whoops made an error, fixed it in my reasoning for E with the above example of Ohio and Illinois.
User avatar
Juaz
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Last visit: 06 Oct 2008
Posts: 241
Own Kudos:
Posts: 241
Kudos: 298
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Should be B.

(1) Total population of country B is substantial higher than that of A.
(2) Population density of country B is substantial lower than that of A.

It means population is spread out in country B, so not much "open land" may be available for wind farms.
User avatar
Path
Joined: 07 Aug 2005
Last visit: 24 Jan 2009
Posts: 45
Own Kudos:
7
 [1]
Posts: 45
Kudos: 7
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
alimad
Wind farms, which generate electricity using arrays of thousands of wind-powered
turbines, require vast expanses of open land. County X and County Y have similar
terrain, but the population density of County X is significantly higher than that of County
Y. Therefore, a wind farm proposed for one of the two counties should be built in
County Y rather than in County X.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the planner’s argument?
A. County X and County Y are adjacent to each other, and both are located in the
windiest area of the state.
B. The total population of County Y is substantially greater than that of County X.
C. Some of the electricity generated by wind farms in County Y would be purchased
by users outside the county.
D. Wind farms require more land per unit of electricity generated than does any other
type of electrical-generation facility.
E. Nearly all of County X’s population is concentrated in a small part of the county,
while County Y’s population is spread evenly throughout the country.


I can only see E because none of the other answers seriously undermines the argument. I'll wait for your comments.


A,C and D out of scope.
B - only population without the land area will not give any conclusion.
E is the answer.
User avatar
Fistail
Joined: 03 May 2007
Last visit: 14 Mar 2019
Posts: 330
Own Kudos:
1,276
 [2]
Given Kudos: 7
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools:University of Chicago, Wharton School
Posts: 330
Kudos: 1,276
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
Wind farms, which generate electricity using arrays of thousands of wind-powered turbines, require vast expanses of open land. County X and County Y have similar terrain, but the population density of County X is significantly higher than that of County Y. Therefore, a wind farm proposed for one of the two counties should be built in County Y rather than in County X.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the planner’s argument?

A. County X and County Y are adjacent to each other, and both are located in the windiest area of the state.
B. The total population of County Y is substantially greater than that of County X.
C. Some of the electricity generated by wind farms in County Y would be purchased by users outside the county.
D. Wind farms require more land per unit of electricity generated than does any other type of electrical-generation facility.
E. Nearly all of County X’s population is concentrated in a small part of the county, while County Y’s population is spread evenly throughout the country.


E. this is clearly E cuz "wind farms need spacious land which is available in x and not in y. so x is better suited for the wind farms.
User avatar
alimad
Joined: 10 Feb 2006
Last visit: 09 Jul 2014
Posts: 466
Own Kudos:
Posts: 466
Kudos: 4,240
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks, quite a stimulating discussion. OA is E.
avatar
smudumala
Joined: 03 Jul 2008
Last visit: 17 Mar 2017
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 49
GMAT 1: 650 Q48 V31
Posts: 4
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
alimad
Wind farms, which generate electricity using arrays of thousands of wind-powered
turbines, require vast expanses of open land. County X and County Y have similar
terrain, but the population density of County X is significantly higher than that of County
Y. Therefore, a wind farm proposed for one of the two counties should be built in
County Y rather than in County X.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the planner’s argument?
A. County X and County Y are adjacent to each other, and both are located in the
windiest area of the state.
B. The total population of County Y is substantially greater than that of County X.
C. Some of the electricity generated by wind farms in County Y would be purchased
by users outside the county.
D. Wind farms require more land per unit of electricity generated than does any other
type of electrical-generation facility.
E. Nearly all of County X’s population is concentrated in a small part of the county,
while County Y’s population is spread evenly throughout the country.


I can only see E because none of the other answers seriously undermines the argument. I'll wait for your comments.

After POE B & E are the contenders.B will not undermine the Conclusion,E does.Therefore E is Answer
User avatar
Skywalker18
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Last visit: 15 Nov 2023
Posts: 2,052
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 171
Status:Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
Posts: 2,052
Kudos: 9,679
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Wind farms, which generate electricity using arrays of thousands of wind-powered turbines, require vast expanses of open land. County X and County Y have similar terrain, but the population density of County X is significantly higher than that of County Y. Therefore, a wind farm proposed for one of the two counties should be built in County Y rather than in County X.

Type - weaken
Boil it down - a wind farm proposed for one of the two counties should be built in County Y rather than in County X.
- How big is each country -If the country Y is very small , then it might not have sufficient vast expanses of open land .
- How is the population distributed ?

A. County X and County Y are adjacent to each other, and both are located in the windiest area of the state.- Irrelevant
B. The total population of County Y is substantially greater than that of County X. - Irrelevant
C. Some of the electricity generated by wind farms in County Y would be purchased by users outside the county. - Irrelevant
D. Wind farms require more land per unit of electricity generated than does any other type of electrical-generation facility.- Irrelevant
E. Nearly all of County X’s population is concentrated in a small part of the county, while County Y’s population is spread evenly throughout the country. - Correct - if this is true , then there will be expanses of open land available in county X
User avatar
adkikani
User avatar
IIM School Moderator
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Last visit: 24 Dec 2023
Posts: 1,238
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,207
Location: India
WE:Engineering (Other)
Posts: 1,238
Kudos: 1,317
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja
VeritasPrepKarishma
GMATNinjaTwo


I was stuck between C/ E

Conclusion: A wind farm must be built for country Y rather than X

Why author says so: Because population density ie people living in per square unit area of land is more in X than in Y
Say X has 100 m2 square of area and 50 people are living in it
then Y has 45 people living in same area.

So more people means more DEMAND for electricity and hence wind farms should be built in X

How can I weaken this:
a. By showing that building a wind farm in Y would be more efficient than in X
b. Suggesting other reason than population density for wind farm to be built in X


Quote:
Some of the electricity generated by wind farms in County Y would be purchased by users outside the county.
If electricity produced in Y would be purchased by users OUTSIDE the country then Y would eventually fall electricity deficient. Hence building a wind farm to cover that deficient shall be a good option to cover that deficit.


Quote:
Nearly all of County X’s population is concentrated in a small part of the county, while County Y’s population is spread evenly throughout the country.

If more people are concentrated in one particular zone, then it means the remaining portion of vacant land could be used for wind farms expansion. X has definitely more free land than Y as per this option, hence is correct choice.
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 09 Jul 2025
Posts: 16,101
Own Kudos:
74,226
 [1]
Given Kudos: 475
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,101
Kudos: 74,226
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Premises:
Wind farms need vast expanses of open land.
Population density (people/sq mile) of X is higher than Y. (This means X may have 1000 people and 10 sq mile area giving a density of 100 while Y may have 2000 people but 40 sq mile area giving a density of 50)
A wind farm has to be made in one of the two counties.

Conclusion:
Make it in Y

We need to weaken the argument.

A. County X and County Y are adjacent to each other, and both are located in the windiest area of the state.

No argument against Y and in favour of X.

B. The total population of County Y is substantially greater than that of County X.

In the example we have taken above, the population of Y is substantially greater than that of X

C. Some of the electricity generated by wind farms in County Y would be purchased by users outside the county.

Irrelevant. Doesn't give an argument against Y in favour of X. Same may happen if installed in county X. How electricity will be used is immaterial. We are focusing on where it is more feasible to set up the farm.

D. Wind farms require more land per unit of electricity generated than does any other type of electrical-generation facility.

We are not looking for arguments against wind based electricity generation.

E. Nearly all of County X’s population is concentrated in a small part of the county, while County Y’s population is spread evenly throughout the country.

We need vast stretches of land for a wind farm. X will probably have those since its population is concentrated so there will be sparsely populated areas too. In County Y, population is evenly distributed on land so we may not have vast areas of sparse population. It then makes better sense to set up the farm in X. This is correct.

Answer (E)
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 09 Jul 2025
Posts: 7,349
Own Kudos:
68,488
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,963
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,349
Kudos: 68,488
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
adkikani
GMATNinja
VeritasPrepKarishma
GMATNinjaTwo


I was stuck between C/ E

Conclusion: A wind farm must be built for country Y rather than X

Why author says so: Because population density ie people living in per square unit area of land is more in X than in Y
Say X has 100 m2 square of area and 50 people are living in it
then Y has 45 people living in same area.

So more people means more DEMAND for electricity and hence wind farms should be built in X

How can I weaken this:
a. By showing that building a wind farm in Y would be more efficient than in X
b. Suggesting other reason than population density for wind farm to be built in X


Quote:
Some of the electricity generated by wind farms in County Y would be purchased by users outside the county.
If electricity produced in Y would be purchased by users OUTSIDE the country then Y would eventually fall electricity deficient. Hence building a wind farm to cover that deficient shall be a good option to cover that deficit.


Quote:
Nearly all of County X’s population is concentrated in a small part of the county, while County Y’s population is spread evenly throughout the country.

If more people are concentrated in one particular zone, then it means the remaining portion of vacant land could be used for wind farms expansion. X has definitely more free land than Y as per this option, hence is correct choice.
adkikani, notice that the excellent explanation by VeritasPrepKarishma doesn't say anything about DEMAND. The author's argument has nothing to do with demand. The author believes that the wind farm should be built in Country Y simply because Country Y has a lower population density. And why does population density matter? Because wind farms "require vast expanses of open land."

Your analysis of choice (E) is perfect. Choice (C) has nothing to do with population density. We don't care who is purchasing the electricity. We only care about the amount of open land in each country. As explained by VeritasPrepKarishma, (C) is irrelevant.
avatar
Rocket7
Joined: 24 Sep 2011
Last visit: 01 Jan 2023
Posts: 82
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 47
Products:
Posts: 82
Kudos: 87
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja, VeritasPrepKarishma, adkikani
Guys just need a thought validation:

Based on answer choice B & Question stem we can conclude this:
X has less population(eg:1000) and higher density (concentrated in areas)
Y: has more population(eg:2000) and lower density. (Not as concentrated as people in X are)

Now cant we say based on the above facts that X has a better probability of providing more expanses of open land than Y because X has lesser population and higher density? Or could we reject B by saying that we don't know about the geographic placement of population chunks that E clearly states?

I see that E has a clear hit in piercing through the conclusion, But I am trying to find a better rejection explanation for B. I will appreciate any input.

Thanks
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 09 Jul 2025
Posts: 16,101
Own Kudos:
74,226
 [1]
Given Kudos: 475
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,101
Kudos: 74,226
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Rocket7
GMATNinja, VeritasPrepKarishma, adkikani
Guys just need a thought validation:

Based on answer choice B & Question stem we can conclude this:
X has less population(eg:1000) and higher density (concentrated in areas)
Y: has more population(eg:2000) and lower density. (Not as concentrated as people in X are)

Now cant we say based on the above facts that X has a better probability of providing more expanses of open land than Y because X has lesser population and higher density? Or could we reject B by saying that we don't know about the geographic placement of population chunks that E clearly states?

I see that E has a clear hit in piercing through the conclusion, But I am trying to find a better rejection explanation for B. I will appreciate any input.

Thanks

Density of population is given by: No of people/Area of land
Higher density means more people or lesser area or both. It has nothing to do with how people are actually distributed across the available land area.

X has higher density than Y means either X has more number of people than Y (land area being the same) or X has lesser land area than Y (assuming same number of people) or both. If X has fewer people, it means its land area is even less.

Density of population does NOT tell us about how the population is spread across the region. Say 200 people per square mile could be evenly distributed across. Of course it is possible that the population is very unevenly distributed but option (B) doesn't give us any info about that. Option (E) clarifies the actual spread of the population across the region.
avatar
Rocket7
Joined: 24 Sep 2011
Last visit: 01 Jan 2023
Posts: 82
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 47
Products:
Posts: 82
Kudos: 87
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks VeritasPrepKarishma. Appreciate your input.
User avatar
vasuca10
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 06 Feb 2016
Last visit: 23 Jul 2022
Posts: 239
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 148
Status:On the journey of achieving
Affiliations: Senior Manager, CA by profession, CFA(USA) Level 2
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Finance
GMAT 1: 560 Q44 V23
GMAT 2: 530 Q39 V24
GMAT 3: 580 Q46 V24 (Online)
GMAT 4: 640 Q50 V26
GPA: 3.82
WE:Other (Commercial Banking)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Wind farms, which generate electricity using arrays of thousands of wind-powered turbines, require vast expanses of open land. County X and County Y have similar terrain, but the population density of County X is significantly higher than that of County Y. Therefore, a wind farm proposed for one of the two counties should be built in County Y rather than in County X.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the planner’s argument?

A. County X and County Y are adjacent to each other, and both are located in the windiest area of the state. - Out of Scope as this option choice does not speaks about Why setting up of Wind farms is favourable in Country X
B. The total population of County Y is substantially greater than that of County X.- Incorrect as despite of higher population of Country Y it is possible that land area required can be higher ending up with lower population density
C. Some of the electricity generated by wind farms in County Y would be purchased by users outside the country. - Out of Scope as it the end use of the electricity generated is not in question here. We are concerned with the feasibility of wind farms either in Country X or in Country Y
D. Wind farms require more land per unit of electricity generated than does any other type of electrical-generation facility.- [b]Irrelevant as we are not concerned with comparison of wind farms with other electrical generation facilities[/b]
E. Nearly all of County X’s population is concentrated in a small part of the county, while County Y’s population is spread evenly throughout the country - Correct as since X's population is concentrated in small parts so it shall require less open land. Therefore building of wind farms shall be feasible option in Country X
User avatar
RashedVai
Joined: 24 Feb 2017
Last visit: 03 Apr 2025
Posts: 173
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 114
Status:wake up with a purpose
Location: Bangladesh
Concentration: Accounting, Entrepreneurship
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
alimad
Wind farms, which generate electricity using arrays of thousands of wind-powered turbines, require vast expanses of open land. County X and County Y have similar terrain, but the population density of County X is significantly higher than that of County Y. Therefore, a wind farm proposed for one of the two counties should be built in County Y rather than in County X.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the planner’s argument?


(A) County X and County Y are adjacent to each other, and both are located in the windiest area of the state.

(B) The total population of County Y is substantially greater than that of County X.

(C) Some of the electricity generated by wind farms in County Y would be purchased by users outside the county.

(D) Wind farms require more land per unit of electricity generated than does any other type of electrical-generation facility.

(E) Nearly all of County X’s population is concentrated in a small part of the county, while County Y’s population is spread evenly throughout the country.

Please explain (B) why it is incorrect? NHasan19058

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
HowdyPartner
Joined: 10 Jul 2018
Last visit: 23 Oct 2020
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 75
Posts: 25
Kudos: 31
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Wind farms, which generate electricity using arrays of thousands of wind-powered turbines, require vast expanses of open land. County X and County Y have similar terrain, but the population density of County X is significantly higher than that of County Y. Therefore, a wind farm proposed for one of the two counties should be built in County Y rather than in County X.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the planner’s argument? Identify question type before reading. We see that it is a Weaken question. Want to make the conclusion less likely to be valid.

after reading the argument -- make sure to predict what could weaken. Maybe the population is all in one spot for X and Y actually has a lot more people, that are more spread out so less land available.

(A) County X and County Y are adjacent to each other, and both are located in the windiest area of the state.Eliminate. This does not weaken.

(B) The total population of County Y is substantially greater than that of County X. Okay -- but County Y may be a lot larger (even though "terrain" is similar. We can keep this around, but we will eliminate later on due to E.

(C) Some of the electricity generated by wind farms in County Y would be purchased by users outside the county. out of scope - eliminate.

(D) Wind farms require more land per unit of electricity generated than does any other type of electrical-generation facility. out of scope - eliminate.

(E) Nearly all of County X’s population is concentrated in a small part of the county, while County Y’s population is spread evenly throughout the country. this is exactly what we are looking for in our prediction for what could weaken. This is our answer.
User avatar
abhilashkapoor
Joined: 14 Dec 2022
Last visit: 14 Dec 2022
Posts: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Pop density is higher in Cx than Cy.

E is the answer
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7349 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts