It is currently 23 Oct 2017, 23:07

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A number of linguists contend that all of the thousands of languages s

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 11 Aug 2005
Posts: 42

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Location: North Carolina
A number of linguists contend that all of the thousands of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Aug 2005, 18:31
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

78% (00:35) correct 22% (00:44) wrong based on 226 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The Official Guide for GMAT Review, 10th Edition, 2003

Practice Question
Question No.: SC 157
Page: 676

A number of linguists contend that all of the thousands of languages spoken by the world's five billion people can be traced back to a common root language.

(A) that all of the thousands of languages spoken by the world' five billion people can be traced

(B) that the world's five billion people speak thousands of languages of which all can be traced

(C) the world's five billion people speak thousands of languages which are all traceable

(D) all of the thousands of languages spoken by the world's five billion people to be traceable

(E) the ability to trace all of the thousands of languages that are spoken by the world's five billion people
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by hazelnut on 03 Oct 2017, 08:22, edited 1 time in total.
Edited the question.

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Jul 2005
Posts: 105

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Re: A number of linguists contend that all of the thousands of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Aug 2005, 09:17
A is also my answer.

All other options are either grammatically wrong or meaningless.


pjreddy_rec wrote:
A number of linguists contend that all of the thousands of languages spoken by the world’s five billion people can be traced back to a common root language.
(A) that all of the thousands of languages spoken by the world’s five billion people can be traced
(B) that the world’s five billion people speak thousands of languages of which all can be traced
(C) the world’s five billion people speak thousands of languages which are all traceable
(D) all of the thousands of languages spoken by the world’s five billion people to be traceable
(E) the ability to trace all of the thousands of languages that are spoken by the world’s five billion people

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Jul 2005
Posts: 105

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Re: A number of linguists contend that all of the thousands of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Aug 2005, 09:17
A is also my answer.

All other options are either grammatically wrong or meaningless.


pjreddy_rec wrote:
A number of linguists contend that all of the thousands of languages spoken by the world’s five billion people can be traced back to a common root language.
(A) that all of the thousands of languages spoken by the world’s five billion people can be traced
(B) that the world’s five billion people speak thousands of languages of which all can be traced
(C) the world’s five billion people speak thousands of languages which are all traceable
(D) all of the thousands of languages spoken by the world’s five billion people to be traceable
(E) the ability to trace all of the thousands of languages that are spoken by the world’s five billion people

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 178

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Location: Hyderabad
Re: A number of linguists contend that all of the thousands of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Aug 2005, 09:34
I like to go for B 'coz its in active voice. I dont find any mistake in the tense or other wise.

In case I'm wrong, please correct me.

Krishna

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 20 Aug 2005
Posts: 29

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: A number of linguists contend that all of the thousands of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Aug 2005, 02:38
crisna
ur reasoning is correct. active should be preferred over passive.
But here A seems better choice
Can any1 give the OA

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 30 Aug 2009
Posts: 64

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 7

Location: LA
Re: A number of linguists contend that all of the thousands of languages s [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Sep 2009, 14:56
IMO, A.

(A) contend that is idiomatically correct - best option
(B) too wordy - eliminate
(C) need a comma before which - eliminate
(D) too wordy - to be traceable - eliminate
(E) change in the meaning of the sentence - eliminate
_________________

---------------------------------------------------------------
Check-out the following:
---------------------------------------------------------------
1. Math Divisibility Test

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 7

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2006
Posts: 62

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 4

Re: A number of linguists contend that all of the thousands of languages s [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Sep 2009, 15:29
I also agree with A

Not having "that" after contend is not idiomatic so choices C,D and E are out
in B "of which" construction is making the sentence wordy

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 4

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2009
Posts: 285

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 9

Concentration: Nonprofit, Strategy
GPA: 3.42
WE: Engineering (Computer Hardware)
Re: A number of linguists contend that all of the thousands of languages s [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Sep 2009, 15:39
would go with A, what comes after contends is a whole sentence...so we need that after contend...contend that + complete sentence....what are the linguists contending here? languages can be traced to a common root, not the people...so A

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 9

Retired Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4288

Kudos [?]: 7934 [0], given: 364

Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: A number of linguists [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Sep 2011, 10:50
Yes. You do require the introductory connector ‘that’ in all reported speeches, lest it should become a run-on or an informal spoken form. . The choice is therefore limited to A and B

Between A and B: In B ‘speak thousands of languages of which all’ is weird and meaningless; ‘All of which’ is the right expression

A is left with a forthright presentation
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Kudos [?]: 7934 [0], given: 364

Retired Moderator
User avatar
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1633

Kudos [?]: 1107 [0], given: 109

Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Re: A number of linguists contend that all of the thousands of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Dec 2011, 18:56
+1 A

I think that the protagonists in this sentence are the languages. So, we can allow passive voice in this sentence.

Passive voice is not always wrong.
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1107 [0], given: 109

Expert Post
2 KUDOS received
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4430

Kudos [?]: 8490 [2], given: 102

Re: A number of linguists contend that all of the thousands of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Dec 2012, 16:16
2
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
GMATtaker777 wrote:
16. A number of linguists contend that all of the thousands of languages spoken by the world’s five billion people can be traced back to a common root language.
(A) that all of the thousands of languages spoken by the world’s five billion people can be traced
(B) that the world’s five billion people speak thousands of languages of which all can be traced
(C) the world’s five billion people speak thousands of languages which are all traceable
(D) all of the thousands of languages spoken by the world’s five billion people to be traceable
(E) the ability to trace all of the thousands of languages that are spoken by the world’s five billion people


I'm happy to help with this. :-)

First of all, on the GMAT, verb like contend, argue, suggest, think, assert, conclude, etc. require a "that"-clause, and the word "that" must appear. In colloquial English, I can say "I thought he was coming" --- that would be fine in ordinary conversation, but it is not up to GMAT standards. GMAT grammar standards demand the word "that" in this context.

Here, that immediately eliminates (C) & (D) & (E). Now, we just choosing between (A) & (B).

Both (A) & (B) are grammatically correct, and it is more a question of emphasis. The substance of the linguists' claim is that the 1000s of languages have a common root language --- a mind-blowing idea. How many people are on earth speaking these 1000s of languages is more a detail for emphasis, and should not be front & center. Choice (A) makes the "thousands of languages ... can be traced" the main subject & verb of the "that"-clause, and this is the heart of the linguist claim. Choice B emphasizes the words "the world’s five billion people speak" by making that the main subject & verb of the "that"-clause ---- this makes brings something that should be a detail to front & center, and relegates what should be the main focuses to a secondary subordinate clause nested inside the "that"-clause. In choice B, the grammatical relations are at odds with the logical priorities. In a well designed sentence, grammar should support logic and the priority of the argument at all steps. Therefore, (B) has problems, but (A) is the best possible answer.

Arguably, choice A is not ideal --- arguably, one could find a more elegant way to express this information. Nevertheless, on GMAT SC, the job is not to find the best possible sentence, but only to find the best among the five available options. Here, (A) is the best of the five.

Does all this make sense?

Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)

Kudos [?]: 8490 [2], given: 102

Retired Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4288

Kudos [?]: 7934 [0], given: 364

Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: A number of linguists contend that all of the thousands of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Sep 2013, 22:06
The issue is not about the linguist’s contending their ability to trace back something to something. It is a general statement to say that these languages can be traced to a common root. By shifting the focus to the linguist’s ability, the meaning is altered.
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Kudos [?]: 7934 [0], given: 364

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2014
Posts: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: A number of linguists contend that all of the thousands of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jul 2014, 16:45
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
The difference between A and B is meaning. B says that every person in the world speak thousands of languages. That is not correct.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 20 Sep 2015
Posts: 1

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: A number of linguists contend that all of the thousands of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Sep 2015, 13:32
*That the world's five billion people speak thousands of languages, which can be traced back to a common root*......this would've been correct. *thousands of languages of which all can be traced* is both weird and illogical..

Correct me if I'm wrong :)

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 19 Mar 2014
Posts: 943

Kudos [?]: 220 [0], given: 188

Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.5
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: A number of linguists contend that all of the thousands of languages s [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Sep 2017, 00:29
A number of linguists contend that all of the thousands of languages spoken by the world’s five billion people can be traced back to a common root language.

(A) that all of the thousands of languages spoken by the world’s five billion people can be traced
(B) that the world’s five billion people speak thousands of languages of which all can be traced
(C) the world’s five billion people speak thousands of languages which are all traceable
(D) all of the thousands of languages spoken by the world’s five billion people to be traceable
(E) the ability to trace all of the thousands of languages that are spoken by the world’s five billion people[/quote]

Subjunctive word "contend" should be followed by "that" - Hence C, D and E are Out

B - Indirection construction and usage of "of which" makes the sentence wordy

Hence - A
_________________

"Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not: nothing is more common than unsuccessful men with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not: the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent."

Worried About IDIOMS? Here is a Daily Practice List: https://gmatclub.com/forum/idiom-s-ydmuley-s-daily-practice-list-250731.html#p1937393

Best AWA Template: https://gmatclub.com/forum/how-to-get-6-0-awa-my-guide-64327.html#p470475

Kudos [?]: 220 [0], given: 188

Re: A number of linguists contend that all of the thousands of languages s   [#permalink] 23 Sep 2017, 00:29
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A number of linguists contend that all of the thousands of languages s

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.