GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 22 Sep 2018, 19:46

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

X: Since many chemicals useful for agriculture and medicine d

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
D
Joined: 02 Jan 2017
Posts: 313
Location: Canada
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
X: Since many chemicals useful for agriculture and medicine d  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 06 Oct 2017, 01:50
2
11
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

65% (02:00) correct 35% (01:55) wrong based on 304 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

X: Since many chemicals useful for agriculture and medicine derive from rare or endangered plant species, it is likely that many plant species that are now extinct could have provide us with substances that would have been a boon to humanity. Therefore, if we want to ensure that chemicals from plants are available for use in the future, we must make more serious efforts to preserve for all time our natural resource.

Y: But living things are not our "resources" Yours is a selfish approach to conservation. We should rather strive to preserve living species because they deserve to survive, not because of the good they can do us.

X’s argument relies on which one of the following assumptions?

(A) Medicine would now be more advanced than it is if there had been a serious conservation policy in the past.
(B) All living things exist to serve humankind.
(C) The use of rare and endangered plant species as a source for chemicals will not itself render those species extinct.
(D) The only way to persuade people to preserve natural resources is to convince them that it is in their interest to do so.
(E) Few, if any, plant species have been saved from extinction through human efforts.

Source: LSAT

Originally posted by vikasp99 on 06 Mar 2017, 22:41.
Last edited by broall on 06 Oct 2017, 01:50, edited 1 time in total.
Reformatted question
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4664
Re: X: Since many chemicals useful for agriculture and medicine d  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Mar 2017, 17:11
1
vikasp99 wrote:
X: Since many chemicals useful for agriculture and medicine derive from rare or endangered plant species, it is likely that many plant species that are now extinct could have provide us with substances that would have been a boon to humanity. Therefore, if we want to ensure that chemicals from plants are available for use in the future, we must make more serious efforts to preserve for all time our natural resource.

Y: But living things are not our "resources." Yours is a selfish approach to conservation. We should rather strive to preserve living species because they deserve to survive, not because of the good they can do us.

X’s argument relies on which one of the following assumptions?

(A) Medicine would now be more advanced than it is if there had been a serious conservation policy in the past.
(B) All living things exist to serve humankind.
(C) The use of rare and endangered plant species as a source for chemicals will not itself render those species extinct.
(D) The only way to persuade people to preserve natural resources is to convince them that it is in their interest to do so.
(E) Few, if any, plant species have been saved from extinction through human efforts.

Dear vikasp99,

I'm happy to respond. :-) This is a good question. Just a period missing, perhaps in the copying process.

We want X's assumption, so Y's objection is a distractor. The Negation Test will be helpful.

(A) Medicine would now be more advanced than it is if there had been a serious conservation policy in the past.
Hmm. We might know a few more cures for this or that, but does adding a few more cures make medicine "more advanced"? What does it mean for medicine to be "more advanced"? There's something unclear about this.
Also, consider the negation test. Suppose preserving those previous plant resulted in just 5 more cures, no more. We certainly could say that just 5 more cures would not make medicine "more advanced." Nevertheless, 5 cures is something, and therefore it suggests that it would be worthwhile to save all the remaining plants, at least until they can be medically tested. Negating this does not destroy the argument, so this is not an assumption.

(B) All living things exist to serve humankind.
No, this is what Y is implying about X's position.

(C) The use of rare and endangered plant species as a source for chemicals will not itself render those species extinct.
Bingo! Think of the Negation Test. If using these species wiped them out, then any benefit would be short-lived, which would not result in much of a "boon to humanity." Negating this obliterates the argument, so this is an assumption.

(D) The only way to persuade people to preserve natural resources is to convince them that it is in their interest to do so.
Not necessarily: this is more Y's take than what X is saying.

(E) Few, if any, plant species have been saved from extinction through human efforts.
We have no evidence for this.

The best answer by far is (C).

Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 24 Oct 2016
Posts: 285
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
Schools: IIMB
GMAT 1: 550 Q42 V28
GPA: 3.96
WE: Human Resources (Retail Banking)
Re: X: Since many chemicals useful for agriculture and medicine d  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Mar 2017, 01:41
the answer should be C.
try negation test ,if the use of these chemicals render those species extinct then the argument falls apart .
Director
Director
User avatar
G
Joined: 04 Sep 2015
Posts: 522
Location: India
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
CAT Tests
Re: X: Since many chemicals useful for agriculture and medicine d  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Mar 2017, 11:25
X: Since many chemicals useful for agriculture and medicine derive from rare or endangered plant species, it is likely that many plant species that are now extinct could have provide us with substances that would have been a boon to humanity. Therefore, if we want to ensure that chemicals from plants are available for use in the future, we must make more serious efforts to preserve for all time our natural resource.

Y: But living things are not our "resources" Yours is a selfish approach to conservation. We should rather strive to preserve living species because they deserve to survive, not because of the good they can do us.

X’s argument relies on which one of the following assumptions?

(A) Medicine would now be more advanced than it is if there had been a serious conservation policy in the past.
the state of medicine is out of scope for the assumption question here.
(B) All living things exist to serve humankind.
if we do negation test the argument will not break aslo the purpose of the existance of the living things is out of scope as X suggest using all the things to server humankind.
](C) The use of rare and endangered plant species as a source for chemicals will not itself render those species extinct.
The excessive use of the endangered plant will not itself lead them to extinction. it is the correct assumption choice,if we negate the choice it will break the argument given by X.
(D) The only way to persuade people to preserve natural resources is to convince them that it is in their interest to do so.
This is extreme,('the only way..')
(E) Few, if any, plant species have been saved from extinction through human efforts.
out of scope for the argument.
Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 2954
Premium Member
Re: X: Since many chemicals useful for agriculture and medicine d  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Sep 2018, 19:23
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

-
April 2018: New Forum dedicated to Verbal Strategies, Guides, and Resources

GMAT Club Bot
Re: X: Since many chemicals useful for agriculture and medicine d &nbs [#permalink] 06 Sep 2018, 19:23
Display posts from previous: Sort by

X: Since many chemicals useful for agriculture and medicine d

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.