Kudos Nink and thanks for your deep insight.
Would you, or anyone, be able to clarify the role of the interview for YSOM?
I've heard they interview roughly 25 - 40% of all applicants and of those interviewed, they extend offers to roughly 50%. (I could be wrong on the exact numbers, but that's what I've been able to find).
So my question is, for those who are interviewed, what weight does the interview have on the overall admission? If you nail the interview do you basically lock up a spot? And vice versa?
Or, do they simply re-evaluate all the candidates they interview, looking at the holisitic application once again, with the inclusion of the interview results?
Sorry if that was confusing to follow, but I'm interested in how much weight the interview carries once they have short-listed the applicant pool.
Thanks,
MrF
nink wrote:
tranceparent wrote:
However, playing devil's advocate, wouldn't it be detrimental to take control of the interview in order to run through your own agenda? The way I see it, the Adcom/2nd Year is conducting your interview, so let them ask the questions they are curious about. After all they are trying to assess your fit with SOM (among other things), so they probably have their own mental checklist they want to go through.
Thoughts?
I think you are misinterpreting what I've said above.
When I say that you should take control of the interview, I don't mean that you should break the structure and conduct the interview the way you want to. What I mean is that when you go to the interview and simply answer their questions, the control is still with the interviewer. You don't know what they might ask so if you want them to know A,B,C,D,E, and F about you, you may not even get that chance because they might simply want to know about X,Y, and Z.
Go in to the interview with a checklist of things that you want to communicate (sort of like an arsenal/repertoire). Know them by heart. When the interviewer asks about M, while answering M, see if you can incorporate A, and B when answering about M.
For example,
If M = "Why Yale?"
and
A = "I am a team-player and well-liked"
B = "I have a wealth of experience and I am a good communicator + teacher"
Your answer to M (Why Yale) question may be:
"Yale is a perfect school for me because BLAH BLAH BLAH..........etc. When I visited before, I noticed how tight the entire YSOM community is when interacting with one another. It's not about competing against one another, but helping each other to evolve as a professional and also as a person. I am a team player and I am well liked by my colleagues. Using the wealth of experience from my previous jobs, I can share what I know with my classmates and learn from them as well. I am a good communicator and I enjoy sharing my knowledge with the others. To me, that's what YSOM is and that's why I want to be here this coming Fall."
Bottomline, go in with a list of things that you want to say during the interview (things that you want to communicate during the interview). Then incorporate them while you are answering what's being asked. When you communicate everything that you want to communicate before the interview is over, you've accomplished the purpose of the interview from your stand-point.