GMAT 675 — Q83 to Q88 — with e-GMAT

Strengths:

Q88. That is the number I keep coming back to — a Quant score I had no business hitting off the base I started from. If you have a decent score that feels like it should be higher, and you suspect you are quietly grinding questions at the wrong difficulty without realizing it, e-GMAT is built for exactly that. PSP fixed the aimlessness first: it took my baseline, target, weekly hours and even the days I wanted off and turned them into a sequenced day-by-day schedule, so the only decision left each morning was to do the work, not to figure out what it was.

Would make the product better:

Then the tools did the heavy lifting, and each one earned its place by changing a specific result:
• The data analytics dashboard logs every question and reports your accuracy at the level of each individual sub-topic, so I could see precisely where I was bleeding marks rather than guessing. Pointed at Algebra, it sent me into the topic quizzes until my hard-question accuracy climbed from 65% to 87% with no extra time per question.
• Scholaranium, the practice bank with roughly 1,100 Quant questions and timed custom filters, let me isolate a weak sub-topic — number properties, in my case — and drill only the questions I'd missed until I was clearing most of them. One of those exact questions, same values and all, showed up on my real exam.
• The sectional mocks built the timed execution that fundamentals alone never give you, and exposed the timing leak that was costing me most.
• The internal forums were quietly essential: an ask-the-expert space under each question where you post any doubt and a subject-matter expert replies within a few hours. On self-paced prep that is the difference between losing a day to one confusion and moving on the same afternoon.
Quant is genuinely where e-GMAT stands apart for me: the hard questions mirror real-exam difficulty so closely that test day felt familiar, not foreign — and Advanced Topics accuracy jumping from 52% to 87% is the proof.

The shift I remember most was in Advanced Topics: I used to funnel anything involving probability or sets into one memorised formula and hope, and the worked solutions showed me two or three cleaner routes to the same answer, so the rigidity that had been capping me dissolved. The mentorship in my final days mattered for a different reason — reassurance more than technique. Three days out my mocks dipped scarily, purely from nerves, and my mentor Dhruv talking me back to "focus on one question, hold the time cap, the worst case is just another attempt" is what let my actual ability surface on the day. One fair warning: the mocks are built to test you, not to comfort you, so expect them to sting. If you've got real fundamentals but you've plateaued and suspect you're grinding the wrong things, this is the one that shows you exactly what to fix and then makes you fix it.