| All Reviews > e-GMAT > e-GMAT 2M Focus > Review Comments |
A clean run at hard prime-number questions is not what I expected out of this prep. I opened those quizzes getting one in five right; inside a week I was at ninety percent. Quant finished as my strongest section — an 85, up from the 81 on an earlier official attempt. Final result: 675 (V83, Q85, DI82).
The problem I arrived with will sound familiar if your score looks like it ought to be higher. Mine was a 595 — respectable enough to be useless as a diagnosis. I could not tell which habits were costing me points, so I kept drilling the wrong things. e-GMAT converts your target score, date and weekly hours into a sequenced plan, and its Personalized Study Plan is built for triage: it decides which section comes first and what is realistically fixable before your exam, instead of letting you graze across all three. PACE narrows it further — brief diagnostic quizzes taken before a topic, which report back which lessons you can skip entirely and which you genuinely need, so no time goes into relearning what you have.
What the plan pointed at, and what actually fixed it:
Cementing quizzes after each topic showed I was solid across Quant except in number properties, primes most of all. They sit at real exam difficulty, which is why that opening score read as information, not discouragement.
Scholaranium's topic-level analytics let me drop a layer into which sub-areas were failing, and the solutions on my misses revealed the concept was never the problem — my approach was slower and leakier than the one being taught. Re-drilling carried hard number properties to ninety percent, and hard word problems from twenty to ninety.
Quant sectional mocks turned accuracy into execution: whole sections under exam timing, coming in 86, 80, 79, 82, 79, 82 before the real 85.
This is where e-GMAT genuinely separates itself, and not on how many questions there are. A hard quiz here behaves like a hard exam question, so the number it returns is a diagnosis you can act on rather than false comfort. My worst quant block was the sales-and-purchase word problem, where I would begin the algebra before I had written anything down. Committing the whole setup to paper first — every figure, every restriction, unglamorous and slow — took that block to ninety percent on hard questions.
One honest caveat: finishing one section before opening the next is draining, and for weeks it feels like standing still. My mentor, Kavyashree, held that line when I asked to run two at once, and the Last Mile Push mentorship in the closing stretch was largely reassurance and pattern-spotting — going through my block-level numbers with me, telling me when a bad week meant nothing.
If your fundamentals are real but your score has plateaued, and you suspect you are grinding the wrong difficulty without knowing it, this is the one.