Beneficial and value for money mocks

Strengths:

The mocks are useful for getting regular full-length practice and improving familiarity with the GMAT format. The interface and timing mechanism make the overall test-taking experience reasonably close to the actual exam. I also found the difficulty level to be useful for practice, particularly in Quant and DI. The explanations and performance analysis after the test help in identifying mistakes and understanding where time was being lost. Having several mocks available is also helpful for tracking consistency and building exam stamina. Overall, I would consider these tests a good supplementary resource for GMAT preparation.

Would make the product better:

The mocks could be improved by making the question selection and section-wise distribution more closely resemble the official GMAT. At times, certain questions or topics felt either slightly different in style or more heavily represented than I would expect from the actual exam. The Verbal section in particular could have closer alignment with the official question style. It would also be helpful to have more detailed comparisons of performance across multiple mocks, including trends in accuracy, timing and difficulty. These changes would make it easier to use the platform not just for practice but also for measuring progress throughout the preparation.

Experts’ Global platform is a reasonably good option for additional GMAT practice. I found the overall test interface and structure fairly similar to the actual GMAT, which makes the mocks useful for getting comfortable with the exam environment and managing time under pressure. The tests also provide enough variety to practice different concepts and identify recurring mistakes. The post-test analysis and explanations are useful for reviewing incorrect answers and understanding areas that need more work. However, I would still recommend using the official GMAT mocks as the primary benchmark for judging actual exam readiness. A few questions, particularly in Verbal, did not feel completely representative of the official style, and some tests could have a more balanced topic distribution. Overall, I would rate Experts’ Global as a useful supplementary resource, especially for gaining additional full-length practice and improving timing and consistency.