60 points to a 675, including a 94th-percentile V85 I did not see coming. That is what one focused rebuild on e-GMAT did for me, and it worked by fixing how I studied, not just what. Here is the trap I was in, and it might be yours too. I had been grinding the Official Guide and still scored 615, and the algorithm never even gave me a single hard Quant question. The Official Guide quietly trains you on easy and medium questions, so it gets you to around 600-615 and leaves you stranded. I had been practicing the wrong difficulty without knowing it. This is where e-GMAT does something the Official Guide cannot: PACE, a pre-module Quant diagnostic, tells you which lessons to skip and which to actually study, so you are not relearning what you already know, and PSP, the Personalized Study Plan, takes your target score, timeline, and weekly hours and turns them into a sequenced plan, so you always know what to work on next instead of guessing. For someone with limited time, that triage is the difference between studying hard and studying smart.

The sharpest reason I would choose e-GMAT over the alternatives is Data Insights. The Official Guide barely covered it, and TTP leaned too heavily on tricks. e-GMAT had the most structured DI course I could find, with real variety in question types and dedicated DI sectionals, and that took my DI from 77 to 80, even on a test day where I skipped the long multi-source set to protect my easier points and never made it back. On Quant, the real win was behavioral, and it shows in the data. On hard Word Problems my accuracy went from 50% to 73%, and on hard Advanced Topics from 56% to 73% while my time on them dropped from 2m42s to 2m6s. The core lessons start at a beginner level and build to advanced topics, so I rebuilt arithmetic and algebra from scratch, but the engine was the sectional mocks: concepts made me competent, the timed sectionals made me both faster and more accurate under pressure.

Verbal is where the transformation was clearest. The pre-thinking method rewired my Critical Reasoning. I used to pick whatever felt right and walk into trap after trap; pre-thinking forced me to find the gap the argument assumes, and the choice that breaks it, before I looked at the options. That single shift turned CR from guessing into clean reasoning, and Verbal landed at a 94th-percentile 85. One honest thing: the platform is not flashy and the mocks are brutal. They do not pretend the exam is easy, which is exactly why test day felt like just another sectional. If you are tired of prep that leaves you guessing about the real exam, and you want a plan that tells you exactly where to spend your time, this is the one I would point you to.

Read More

If there's a single before-and-after I'd point to, it's CR: I used to lock onto a confident-looking answer and skip the rest, and reviewing every miss until I understood why rewired that into reading every option, every time - a real change in how I think, not just a higher number. The same discipline carried Quant from Q79 to Q85 on timed sectional mocks. The part I underrated was the closing-phase mentorship through Last Mile Push: more than tactics, it was reassurance - knowing someone was there when I was spiraling in a one-month sprint took real weight off, and I'm thankful for it. I'd recommend e-GMAT most to someone like me: a strong reader who's shaky on Quant and lost on DI, who needs a plan that says exactly where to spend a short, high-pressure month. From cold and clueless to a 685, it delivered.

Read More

The last stretch wasn't about knowledge at all, and this is where the Last Mile Push earned my deepest thanks. In the closing phase, having my mentor Dhruv read my performance data with me caught the behavior I could never see on my own: overconfidence — rushing, re-reading, not working sequentially. A skill gap shows in the data; a habit like that needs an outside pair of eyes, and Dhruv's guidance in that final mile is genuinely what closed the distance. I owe Dhruv an enormous thank-you. My honest bottom line: e-GMAT is the best prep platform out there, period. If you're capable but your scores keep undershooting your ability — if what's in your way is how you take the test rather than what you know — this is the platform that will pinpoint it, sequence your climb, and in the final stretch put a human on the gap the analytics can't name for you. It changed my outcome, and I cannot recommend it highly enough.

Read More

5/5 experience. Amazing value for money product. I used Expert Global mocks to prepare for my GMAT and the score I got on the actual GMAT was very similar to the scores I was getting on the mocks. The questions are very similar in difficulty and pattern, which helped me understand the real exam better. The whole experience is like giving the actual GMAT exam, from timing to question quality. It is also very affordable compared to other mock test providers. If you are preparing for GMAT and need a good quantity of mocks with realistic questions, I would definitely recommend it. Totally worth it and helped me feel confident on test day.

Read More

The transformation that mattered most was not visible in the score numbers alone. MSR questions in DI and weaken/strengthen questions in CR — types I was consistently getting wrong across the first ten months — became reliable through targeted Neuron OG and Scholaranium practice. I could feel the shift from approaching those types with anxiety to approaching them with a clear process. The e-GMAT sectional mocks after each module acted as approval checkpoints, and the error log kept my post-mock analysis honest. On test day I scored 745 (V85, Q88, DI88) — 100th percentile. I would recommend e-GMAT specifically to students who are stuck above 700 and cannot diagnose why: the L10/L20 ability tracking and the platform's diagnostic depth will show you what self-prep cannot.

Read More

Overall, this is a really good course, especially if you’re just starting your GMAT preparation. It helps build a strong conceptual foundation and gives you a clear process to follow while solving questions. Once you develop that process, you naturally become much more confident in your approach and decision-making during the exam.

DI was one of the biggest highlights for me. The variety and volume of questions available, especially for topics like MSR where I initially struggled, really helped improve my confidence. If you already have a decent grasp of Quant, the sectional mocks can genuinely make a huge difference to your score.

Another major positive for me was the study plan. Since this was my second attempt, I didn’t want to start from scratch again. Having a structured strategy helped me focus on the right set of questions at the right pace instead of trying to do everything available. It made my preparation much more efficient and targeted.

The GMAT-style mock exams were also very helpful in replicating actual exam-day conditions, which made me feel more comfortable and prepared going into the test.

I was working with Dhruv as my mentor throughout my preparation, and he was amazing to work with. His feedback on my mocks, the way he identified my weak areas, and the guidance he provided on improving my strategy played a huge role in helping me achieve a good score. I’d especially recommend him to people who are capable of solving questions but need the right structure, planning, and guidance to push their score to the next level.

One area where the course could improve would be offering more personalized feedback sessions, along with more concise revision notes and formula sheets for quick review.

Overall, I would definitely recommend this course to anyone starting their GMAT prep or looking to build a better problem-solving process and exam strategy.

Read More

The e-GMAT platform is completely self-sufficient. The course structure, the Scholaranium cementing quizzes, the custom quiz builder, the skill tracking, the Ask the Expert section — all of it works as a system, and following it consistently delivers results without needing anything external. My Q88 came from trusting that system and staying with the process even when the improvement felt invisible. The eGMAT mentors also played a huge role in my preparation and I am very thankful to Dhruv for sticking with me all along.

The curve is not linear, but it compounds. If you are somewhere in the middle of your own prep right now and it feels like the work is not paying off yet — just stay with it. Good luck out there.

Read More

I found it really helpful; all the explanations of basic concepts are really good, along with all the topic practice, which helped me to increase my scores, Dashboard is good, it helped me to keep a track of my progress and my learning topic wise as well as secssion wise all thing were goosd and It was helpful and gave me scoring almost similar to original exam and all thing including all the session helped me to improve my scores with every video. every topic each topic and all topic including percentage topic ratio topic and all fraction topic easy idea of multiplication and sqare root and all help to understand all thing including all topic including all values including each topic and including all secsion was really really really really helpful. I re really really really really love it so really really really really very much.

Read More

I started my GMAT preparation with a baseline practice score of 545 and eventually worked my way up to a peak practice score of 695 on e-GMAT's platform. The platform definitely has its strong suits: it provides an exhaustive question bank, plenty of sectional tests, and 5 solid model tests that give you more than enough material to practice with.

However, my actual test day experience was a major disappointment. I found the course material itself to be incredibly time-consuming, and the solutions they teach are not time-effective for the actual exam. While they heavily brand their approaches as structured, I found them clunky and unrealistic to apply under strict time limits. The "Last Mile Push" program also felt overhyped and didn't bridge that gap for me.

On the actual test day, the combination of e-GMAT's time-heavy strategies and standard exam center stress completely derailed my pacing. I was forced to guess randomly on a large number of questions just to finish the sections. This time mismanagement resulted in a final score that dropped below my baseline, ultimately causing me to miss my Deferred MBA application deadline. It is a good platform for accessing practice questions, but I highly caution against relying solely on their pacing and execution strategies.

Read More

It was very helpful to get an affordable course and it helped me in refreshing the concepts very well ! Th e quant refresher was nice but could include more proactive questions and the verbal refresher was good too ! I also practiced using the GMATCLUB resources for improving my practice tests score and it's paid resources were really helpful ! I'm thankful to both the GMATCLUB and MAGOOSH team for helping me with the right set of resources. It was a good experience being a part of this community to learn about GMAT preparation and I'm thankful for it.

Read More