The argument assumes that the cost of parking (i.e., the need to pay) will lead to fewer customers visiting downtown businesses, thereby reducing sales. The assumption is about how people will respond to paying for parking instead of parking for free.
A. Other incentives or conveniences are insufficient to keep the same number of customers visiting downtown businesses.
This would mean that, even if the city provides other reasons or incentives to visit downtown (e.g., improved public transportation or discounts for customers), these wouldn’t be enough to offset the loss in customers due to the removal of free parking. This option seems plausible, as it addresses the concern that free parking might be a crucial factor, and other incentives might not compensate for the loss of that benefit. This option is a reasonable assumption but not the most direct one.
INCORRECTB. Downtown businesses depend solely on customers who drive and park downtown for the majority of their sales.
This suggests that businesses rely exclusively on customers who drive and park downtown. The argument doesn’t necessarily assume these businesses may still have customers who use public transportation, walk, or use other means of transportation. The argument is more about the effect of paying for parking on those who currently park for free. This assumption is too extreme and not directly implied by the argument.
INCORRECTC. The primary reason for removing free parking is to generate additional revenue from paid parking spaces.
This is a possible reason for the city's plan but doesn’t reflect the core assumption behind the concern of downtown businesses. The argument is more focused on the impact on customer behavior (how the removal of free parking will affect sales), not the city's motivation for the policy.
INCORRECTD. Customers who currently use the free parking are likely to visit downtown businesses less often if they have to pay for parking.
This directly addresses the assumption behind the businesses' concern. The argument assumes that if customers who currently park for free are required to pay for parking, they will visit downtown less often. This assumption is critical to the argument because if customers do reduce their visits, sales would indeed decrease.
CORRECTE. The city should provide additional public transportation options to compensate for the removal of free parking spaces.
This is an opinion or recommendation rather than an assumption. The argument does not require this to be true for the concern about reduced sales to be valid.
INCORRECTIMO D