guddo
A collection of 36 cards consists of 4 sets of 9 cards each. The 9 cards in each set are numbered 1 through 9. If one card has been removed from the collection, what is the number on that card?
(1) The units digit of the sum of the numbers on the remaining 35 cards is 6.
(2) The sum of the numbers on the remaining 35 cards is 176.
Of course, we can calculate and see that both statements are sufficient. But I wanted to highlight a logical approach that I observed post solving the question.
Statement (1):We know each card has a number from
1 to 9, and there are 4 identical sets. So the total sum of all 36 cards is fixed (though we don't even need to calculate it).
When one card is removed, we’re told the
units digit of the remaining sum is 6. Now, since all cards are numbered only from
1 to 9, removing a single card means subtracting a number from 1 to 9 from the total. This subtraction will lead to a unique units digit in the remaining sum. For example:
- If total sum = 180 (for illustration), then (This works no matter what the total sum of all the cards is) :
- Remove 1 → 179 (units digit 9)
- Remove 2 → 178 (units digit 8)
- ...
- Remove 4 → 176 (units digit 6)
- ...
So if the resulting units digit is 6, we can
uniquely identify that the removed number was
4.
In this case, if we had a card numbered 10 in the set... then also we would have been able to uniquely identify the removed number based on the units digit (this is possible because we don't have a card numbered as 0 --> if we had, removing a card numbered 0 or 10, both would provide us with the same units digit, and thus the number on card removed would be indistinguishable by units digit alone)
Had the cards included higher numbers, greater than 10, like 11, 12, etc., the
units digit would not uniquely identify the removed card.
For instance, 180 – 1 = 179 and 180 – 11 = 169 → both end in 9. So 1 and 11 would be indistinguishable by units digit alone.
But in this case, because the numbers are
strictly 1 through 9, knowing the units digit of the remaining sum is enough to uniquely identify the removed card.
Statement (2):Same logic applies. If the total sum is 180 (which it is: 4 × (1+2+...+9) = 4 × 45 = 180), and the sum of remaining 35 cards is
176, then the removed card is clearly
4.
So... Even without calculating the total, the constraint that card numbers range from 1 to 9 ensures that
each possible removal leaves a distinct final units digit. That’s what makes both statements
individually sufficient.