GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 14 Dec 2018, 16:06

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in December
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
2526272829301
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
303112345
Open Detailed Calendar
  • Typical Day of a UCLA MBA Student - Recording of Webinar with UCLA Adcom and Student

     December 14, 2018

     December 14, 2018

     10:00 PM PST

     11:00 PM PST

    Carolyn and Brett - nicely explained what is the typical day of a UCLA student. I am posting below recording of the webinar for those who could't attend this session.
  • Free GMAT Strategy Webinar

     December 15, 2018

     December 15, 2018

     07:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    Aiming to score 760+? Attend this FREE session to learn how to Define your GMAT Strategy, Create your Study Plan and Master the Core Skills to excel on the GMAT.

A consumer magazine surveyed people who had sought

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 19 Jun 2012
Posts: 16
A consumer magazine surveyed people who had sought  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 18 Sep 2017, 19:26
9
22
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  75% (hard)

Question Stats:

55% (01:41) correct 45% (01:50) wrong based on 851 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

A consumer magazine surveyed people who had sought a psychologist’s help with a personal problem. Of those responding who had received treatment for 6 months or less, 20 percent claimed that treatment “made things a lot better.” Of those responding who had received longer treatment, 36 percent claimed that treatment “made things a lot better.” Therefore, psychological treatment lasting more than 6 months is more effective than shorter-term treatment.

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) Of the respondents who had received treatment for longer than 6 months, 10 percent said that treatment made things worse.

(B) Patients who had received treatment for longer than 6 months were more likely to respond to the survey than were those who had received treatment for a shorter time.

(C) Patients who feel they are doing well in treatment tend to remain in treatment, while those who are doing poorly tend to quit earlier.

(D) Patients who were dissatisfied with their treatment were more likely to feel a need to express their feelings about it and thus to return the survey.

(E) Many psychologists encourage their patients to receive treatment for longer than 6 months.

Source: LSAT

_________________

If questions jerk in your mind, then give me a KUDOS


Originally posted by creativeminddu on 19 Nov 2013, 02:13.
Last edited by broall on 18 Sep 2017, 19:26, edited 3 times in total.
Formatted
Most Helpful Expert Reply
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 23 Oct 2013
Posts: 144
Re: A consumer magazine surveyed people who had sought  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Nov 2013, 19:11
13
1
This critical reasoning question focuses on a flawed use of statistics. A higher percentage of people who received treatment for longer than 6 months felt a lot better than did those who received treatment for under 6 months. The interesting thing about this question is that one pool leads directly into the other. People must receive therapy for less than 6 months before converting into the other pool and receiving therapy for more than 6 months.

Answer choice C points this out and weakens the argument effectively. If people are more likely to stay in therapy longer if it is going well, then a higher percentage of those people in therapy for a longer time will respond positively than will those who receive therapy for shorter time periods. Thus it is not necessarily the longer therapy that is more effective, but rather that for people who find therapy effective they stay with therapy longer. This could be thought of as reverse causation of sorts. Instead of long therapy causing more positive results, more positive results will result in longer therapy.

I hope this helps!!!
_________________

Brandon
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

If you found this post helpful, please give me kudos!!! :)

Save $100 on Veritas Prep GMAT Courses And Admissions Consulting
Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options.

Veritas Prep Reviews

General Discussion
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2011
Posts: 189
GPA: 3.46
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Premium Member
Re: A consumer magazine surveyed people who had sought  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Nov 2013, 19:46
Hi Brandon,

I was stuck between B & C. Could you please point out the flaw in the option B? Will appreciate. Thanks.

VeritasPrepBrandon wrote:
This critical reasoning question focuses on a flawed use of statistics. A higher percentage of people who received treatment for longer than 6 months felt a lot better than did those who received treatment for under 6 months. The interesting thing about this question is that one pool leads directly into the other. People must receive therapy for less than 6 months before converting into the other pool and receiving therapy for more than 6 months.

Answer choice C points this out and weakens the argument effectively. If people are more likely to stay in therapy longer if it is going well, then a higher percentage of those people in therapy for a longer time will respond positively than will those who receive therapy for shorter time periods. Thus it is not necessarily the longer therapy that is more effective, but rather that for people who find therapy effective they stay with therapy longer. This could be thought of as reverse causation of sorts. Instead of long therapy causing more positive results, more positive results will result in longer therapy.

I hope this helps!!!
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 23 Oct 2013
Posts: 144
Re: A consumer magazine surveyed people who had sought  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Nov 2013, 05:43
8
2
Answer choice B in this question is wrong because it does not specify anything about those who felt it helped being more or less likely to respond, but rather just focuses on those who have received therapy for a longer time period being more likely to respond. Basically it is not focused on the correct differentiator. If there were 100 people who received therapy for more than 6 months and 100 people who received therapy for less than 6 months, and 50 of the people who received therapy for more than 6 months replied, but only 30 of those who received therapy for under 6 months replied, this does not change the fact that a higher percentage of the respondents of the longer therapy were helped.

[quote="mba1382"]Hi Brandon,

I was stuck between B & C. Could you please point out the flaw in the option B? Will appreciate. Thanks.
_________________

Brandon
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

If you found this post helpful, please give me kudos!!! :)

Save $100 on Veritas Prep GMAT Courses And Admissions Consulting
Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options.

Veritas Prep Reviews

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2011
Posts: 189
GPA: 3.46
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Premium Member
Re: A consumer magazine surveyed people who had sought  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Nov 2013, 07:36
Thanks Brendon. Indeed nice explanation :-)

VeritasPrepBrandon wrote:
Answer choice B in this question is wrong because it does not specify anything about those who felt it helped being more or less likely to respond, but rather just focuses on those who have received therapy for a longer time period being more likely to respond. Basically it is not focused on the correct differentiator. If there were 100 people who received therapy for more than 6 months and 100 people who received therapy for less than 6 months, and 50 of the people who received therapy for more than 6 months replied, but only 30 of those who received therapy for under 6 months replied, this does not change the fact that a higher percentage of the respondents of the longer therapy were helped.

mba1382 wrote:
Hi Brandon,

I was stuck between B & C. Could you please point out the flaw in the option B? Will appreciate. Thanks.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 09 Nov 2013
Posts: 76
Re: A consumer magazine surveyed people who had sought  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Nov 2013, 09:57
Well yes, initially it seems that answer c is wrong; However,option c is right as it directly affects the # of people surveyed ( who remained and who left) whereas the option b is more on doubt about the degree of likeliness to respond or surveyed but does not communicate whether they have actually participated in survey or not. But option C, if true, will surly affect the difference in # of respondents responded between the two groups.
SVP
SVP
avatar
P
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1645
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: A consumer magazine surveyed people who had sought  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jul 2017, 15:52
there is a similar question and the answer is B because there the answer C does not appear!
this is actually a mix question of explanation and weaken; clearly, the answer not only gives an explanation, but also weakens the claim that the treatment lasting more than 6 months is more effective.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 24 Feb 2018
Posts: 1
A consumer magazine surveyed people who had sought  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Sep 2018, 06:40
So when i was doing this question I was confused between B, C, D. Quick Ans why i choose C :-

B) Patients who had received treatment for longer than 6 months were more likely to respond to the survey than were those who had received treatment for a shorter time. Means, For folks who had received treatment for longer than 6 months, both Negative responders and positive responders (in the same proportion) will be more likely to repond to the survey. We got 36% positive feedback. Unless told specifically that negative responders (in this group i.e. folks who had received treatment for longer than 6 months) are more than positive responders, we could say that more months is good, as we got 36% positive result.

(C) Patients who feel they are doing well in treatment tend to remain in treatment, while those who are doing poorly tend to quit earlier. So if both positive and negative people are equaly likely to repond to the survey, then we can say that greater positive feedback gives better satisfaction or result.

Now assume a situation in which positive users are more likely to continue the treatment for more than 6 months, making proportion of positive users more. So clearly this could weaken the argument. AS this could be a case where only satisfied people are opting for more than 6 months period. So may be treatment will result same effect, but as positive feedback people are more in the group the survey will result in 36% positive feedback. So ans c is correct.


(D) Patients who were dissatisfied with their treatment were more likely to feel a need to express their feelings about it and thus to return the survey. Same as this hold true for both the groups i.e. group 1 -- who had treatment for less than 6 months and group 2- who had treatment for more than 6 months.
GMAT Club Bot
A consumer magazine surveyed people who had sought &nbs [#permalink] 29 Sep 2018, 06:40
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A consumer magazine surveyed people who had sought

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.