A financial analyst predicts that the government bailout of a bank

Question

A financial analyst predicts that the government bailout of a bank  would fail if the proportion of home loan exposure in that bank is more than  40 percent of its total exposure

(A) would fail if the proportion of home loan exposure in that bank is more than

(B) would fall provided the proportion of home loan exposure in that bank is more than

(C) should fail if the home loan exposure in that bank was greater than

(D) will fail if the proportion of home loan exposure in that bank is greater than

(E) will fail if the home loan home loan exposure in that bank were more than

sayantanc2k · Accepted Answer

Using "predict" with "would" would be redundancy.

The analyst predicts that bailout WILL fail... correct
The analyst predicts that bailout WOULD fail.. redundancy

(Words such as believe, predict, fear, envisage etc. already imply hypothesis - use of "would" with such words is redundant.)

VyshakhR1995 · Answer

If "clause" ,then "clause" --------> follows certain rules

If "present tense",simple present or will clause
If "past tense" , simple past or would clause 
If "past perfect",would have clause
hope its clear

Tan2017 · Answer

This question tests 2 concepts namely "Will Vs Would" and "Greater vs More"

Concept 1: Bank Loan exposure is countable, hence the greater would be more appropriate

A financial analyst  predicts  that the government bailout of a bank  would fail if the proportion of home loan exposure in that bank is more than 40 percent of its total exposure

Concept 2: Now the non-underlined portion of the stem is simple present, hence "will" ie simple future should be used in the conditional sentence

Option D corrects both these errors:  will  fail if the proportion of home loan exposure in that bank is  greater than

Shruti0805 · Answer

Can we use 'will' with predicts ? Isn't would better suited ?

varun4s · Answer

A financial analyst predicts that the government bailout of a bank  would fail if the proportion of home loan exposure in that bank is more than  40 percent of its total exposure

A) would  fail if the proportion of home loan exposure in that bank is more than  (Need simple future tense for prediction) 
B) would  fall provided the proportion of home loan exposure in that bank is more than  (Same as A) 
C)should fail if the home loan exposure in that bank  was  greater than  (Same as A) 
D)will fail if the proportion of home loan exposure in that bank is greater than  (Correct) 
E)will fail if the home loan home loan exposure in that bank  were  more than  (Same as A)

Kudos please if you like my explanation!

eddy8700 · Answer

A financial analyst predicts that the government bailout of a bank would fail if the proportion of home loan exposure in that bank is more than 40 percent of its total exposure

A)would fail if the proportion of home loan exposure in that bank is more than
B)would fall provided the proportion of home loan exposure in that bank is more than
C)should fail if the home loan exposure in that bank was greater than 
D)will fail if the proportion of home loan exposure in that bank is greater than
E)will fail if the home loan home loan exposure in that bank were more than

if then construct

if present tense then present tense/future tense
if past tense then would +verb
only D fits the bill

soapbolt · Answer

One extra point  
If you are not sure if we should used would with predict or will , there is one more issue on which you can reply to get this one correct.

=> Greater than should be used to compare entities if entities are in percentage.

Option C and D uses that and we know for sure C is incorrect. Hence  Option D  is correct Choice

gaurav2m · Answer

Hi  sayantanc2k  / @egmat/  GMATNinja  /  VeritasKarishma

in the right option as you said there is a hypothesis, shouldn't we require subjunctive verb rather than as a usual if-else rule?

Please clarify where else we can use subjunctive apart from  triggerword+subject+that  rule

KarishmaB · Answer

Subjunctive shows a wish, suggestion, demand, command or hypothetical situation.

Subjunctive is used in hypothetical cases - those which are contrary to reality. (If A were true, B would be true. But this means that A is not actually true)
If I were the President of US, I would ....
Contrary to reality. I am not the president.

In this question, the author has put forward a hypothesis - If A happens, B will happen. This just means that if A happens (certainly a possible case, B will happen)
If I become the President of US, I will ...
This is what will happen if I become the president in the future. This is possible.

VerbalBot · Answer

Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

A financial analyst predicts that the government bailout of a bank

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Sentence Correction (SC - EA only) Questions

A financial analyst predicts that the government bailout of a bank

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards