GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 16 Feb 2019, 23:47

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in February
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
272829303112
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
242526272812
Open Detailed Calendar
  • Free GMAT Algebra Webinar

     February 17, 2019

     February 17, 2019

     07:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    Attend this Free Algebra Webinar and learn how to master Inequalities and Absolute Value problems on GMAT.
  • Free GMAT Strategy Webinar

     February 16, 2019

     February 16, 2019

     07:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    Aiming to score 760+? Attend this FREE session to learn how to Define your GMAT Strategy, Create your Study Plan and Master the Core Skills to excel on the GMAT.

A newly discovered painting seems to be the work of one of two sevente

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

 
Senior SC Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 1321
Location: Malaysia
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: A newly discovered painting seems to be the work of one of two sevente  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Apr 2017, 22:08
pawanCEO wrote:
A newly discovered painting seems to be the work of one of two seventeenth-century artists, either the northern German Johannes Drechen or the Frenchman Louis Birelle, who sometimes painted in the same style as Drechen. Analysis of the carved picture frame, which has been identified as the painting’s original seventeenth-century frame, showed that it is made of wood found widely in northern Germany at the time, but rare in the part of France where Birelle lived. This shows that the painting is most likely the work of Drechen.

Which of the following is an assumption that the argument requires?

(A) The frame was made from wood local to the region where the picture was painted.
(B) Drechen is unlikely to have ever visited the home region of Birelle in France.
(C) Sometimes a painting so resembles others of its era that no expert is able to confidently decide who painted it.
(D) The painter of the picture chose the frame for the picture.
(E) The carving style of the picture frame is not typical of any specific region of Europe.


OG2017, CR552, P512

Seventeenth-Century Painting
 
Step 1: Identify the Question

The word assumption in the question stem shows that this is a Find the Assumption question.

Step 2: Deconstruct the Argument

Painting might be by D or B (B sometimes painted like D)
D = Germany, B = France
Picture frame is wood from Germany → D is the artist

There are two possible candidates for the creator of a particular painting. Based on where the picture’s frame likely came from, the author concludes that the artist came from the same location. Must it be the case that the artist and the picture frame came from the same location?

Step 3: Pause and State the Goal

On Assumption questions, the goal is to find an unstated fact that would have to be true in order for the logic of the argument to be reasonable. If this statement were false, the argument wouldn’t make logical sense.

Step 4: Work from Wrong to Right

(A) CORRECT. This must be true in order for the author’s reasoning to be sound. If the frame had instead been made from wood that originated elsewhere, the author couldn’t draw any connection between the frame’s origin and the painting’s origin.
(B) Since the painting was framed with German wood, not French, whether Drechen visited France is irrelevant. The argument already makes it clear that the painting was not framed with wood from France, regardless of who visited the area and who created the painting.
(C) This doesn’t have to be true in order for the logic of the argument to be reasonable. In fact, in order to accept the argument, it’s necessary to assume that it is possible to determine who created this particular painting with some degree of certainty.
(D) The artist didn’t necessarily have to choose the frame himself. Somebody else in the same geographic area, such as a local buyer, might have chosen the frame.
(E) It’s necessary to assume that the carving style wasn’t especially typical of France, or the argument’s reasoning would be damaged, since it would then be more likely that the frame was created in France. However, the author didn’t assume that the carving style wasn’t typical of any European region. It could have been typical of Germany, or of some other region in Europe outside of both artists’ areas, and the conclusion would still have been reasonable.
_________________

"Be challenged at EVERY MOMENT."

“Strength doesn’t come from what you can do. It comes from overcoming the things you once thought you couldn’t.”

"Each stage of the journey is crucial to attaining new heights of knowledge."

Rules for posting in verbal forum | Please DO NOT post short answer in your post!

Advanced Search : https://gmatclub.com/forum/advanced-search/

Current Student
avatar
B
Joined: 25 Feb 2017
Posts: 34
Location: Korea, Republic of
Schools: LBS '19 (A)
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
GPA: 3.67
Reviews Badge
Re: A newly discovered painting seems to be the work of one of two sevente  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Apr 2017, 00:31
A newly discovered painting seems to be the work of one of two seventeenth-century artists, either the northern German Johannes Drechen or the Frenchman Louis Birelle, who sometimes painted in the same style as Drechen. Analysis of the carved picture frame, which has been identified as the painting’s original seventeenth-century frame, showed that it is made of wood found widely in northern Germany at the time, but rare in the part of France where Birelle lived. This shows that the painting is most likely the work of Drechen.

Which of the following is an assumption that the argument requires?

(A) The frame was made from wood local to the region where the picture was painted.
(B) Drechen is unlikely to have ever visited the home region of Birelle in France.
(C) Sometimes a painting so resembles others of its era that no expert is able to confidently decide who painted it.
(D) The painter of the picture chose the frame for the picture.
(E) The carving style of the picture frame is not typical of any specific region of Europe.

My 2 cents on why D is wrong.

Although D is tempting, we have to be careful in the premise.
The premise hinges upon the location of wood, not whether it was painter or someone else.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 17 Aug 2016
Posts: 49
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: A newly discovered painting seems to be the work of one of two sevente  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Sep 2017, 07:55
I got this question wrong. Just thought to jot down my thoughts to have a better clarity. Was confused between A and D. Ended up marking D. :cry:

Premise: A newly discovered painting seems to be the work of one of two seventeenth-century artists, either the northern German Johannes Drechen or the Frenchman Louis Birelle, who sometimes painted in the same style as Drechen. Analysis of the carved picture frame, which has been identified as the painting’s original seventeenth-century frame, showed that it is made of wood found widely in northern Germany at the time, but rare in the part of France where Birelle lived.

Conclusion: This shows that the painting is most likely the work of Drechen.

Pre-thinking: Wood is widely found in Germany, so the assumption is Drechen was the one who did the painting. The wood cannot be easily used in France(rare in part of France). So we need to look for an option which strengthens this fact and helps in solidifying the conclusion.

Which of the following is an assumption that the argument requires?

A. The frame was made from wood local to the region where the picture was painted.
[If the wood is not local, then the conclusion will fall apart because that would mean that the wood could have been obtained from anywhere. But the conclusion hinges on the fact that it is from Germany, and so it must have been locally procured. The wood is also rarely available in France, so it cannot be locally procured. So this seems a valid assumption]

B. Drechen is unlikely to have ever visited the home region of Birelle in France.
[Even if he has, this assumption will not confirm or deny the fact that Drechen did or did not do the painting - Eliminated ]

C. Sometimes a painting so resembles others of its era that no expert is able to confidently decide who painted it.
[in the premise it is mentioned that it seems to be a work of 17th century. Also, we are not concerned if it can be confidently determined or not. We need to find the assumption behind choosing Drechen, this cannot be the assumption. in fact, this weakens it.]

D. The painter of the picture chose the frame for the picture.
[Now here is where I made a mistake. I negated this statement and assumed that someone else chose it and thought this would definitely cast a doubt when negated and marked this as the answer. Now assuming that someone chose it, it actually does not cast any doubt that Drechen did not do it. In fact, this would not even confirm that Birelle did it. Had that been the case, we could have considered the option. Since negating the statement does not completely shatter the argument we can eliminate this option. ]

E. The carving style of the picture frame is not typical of any specific region of Europe.
[Again this cannot be the assumption, because even if it is not typical it does cast a doubt that Drechen did not do it - eliminated.]
_________________

Work Hard! Have Fun! Create History! :)

SVP
SVP
avatar
P
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1592
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: A newly discovered painting seems to be the work of one of two sevente  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Dec 2017, 04:27
Although this question is not hard, the combination of the confusion of the question and the pressure of the time causes troubles to test takers.

A,B, and D are left.
B does not sound like an assumption. Ones will find the reason if they have undergone heavy practices.
D just repeats the argument, and D creates an illusion that D is the right answer; however, the correct pattern lies in A.
Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 14 Dec 2017
Posts: 522
Location: India
Premium Member
Re: A newly discovered painting seems to be the work of one of two sevente  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Jun 2018, 10:21
pawanCEO wrote:
A newly discovered painting seems to be the work of one of two seventeenth-century artists, either the northern German Johannes Drechen or the Frenchman Louis Birelle, who sometimes painted in the same style as Drechen. Analysis of the carved picture frame, which has been identified as the painting’s original seventeenth-century frame, showed that it is made of wood found widely in northern Germany at the time, but rare in the part of France where Birelle lived. This shows that the painting is most likely the work of Drechen.

Which of the following is an assumption that the argument requires?

(A) The frame was made from wood local to the region where the picture was painted.
(B) Drechen is unlikely to have ever visited the home region of Birelle in France.
(C) Sometimes a painting so resembles others of its era that no expert is able to confidently decide who painted it.
(D) The painter of the picture chose the frame for the picture.
(E) The carving style of the picture frame is not typical of any specific region of Europe.

OG2017, CR552, P512


Question Type: Assumption

Premise 1: Analysis of the picture frame, suggests that the wood from which the frame is made out of, is native to northern Germany & is rare in the part of france where Birelle lived.

Conclusion: Hence the painting is most likely the work of Drechen, who hails from northern Germany.

Analysis: For the conclusion to hold the assumption needs that either the wood from which the frame is made is not found anywhere else but Northern Germany or during 17th Century, frames were made from wood available in the local geography, where the painting was created.


(A) The frame was made from wood local to the region where the picture was painted. - Therefore the painting was made in Northern Germany & hence it is most likely that Drechen painted it. Correct
(B) Drechen is unlikely to have ever visited the home region of Birelle in France. The wood belongs to a tree from northern germany, hence the answer choice doesnt affect that fact irrespective of whether Drechen visited Brille's home region or not. Incorrect
(C) Sometimes a painting so resembles others of its era that no expert is able to confidently decide who painted it. Weakens the whole argument. Incorrect
(D) The painter of the picture chose the frame for the picture. However we cannot conclude who chose the frame. Incorrect.
(E) The carving style of the picture frame is not typical of any specific region of Europe. Weakens the whole argument. Incorrect


Thanks,
GyM
_________________

New to GMAT Club - https://gmatclub.com/forum/new-to-gmat-club-need-help-271131.html#p2098335

Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 14 Jul 2014
Posts: 92
Location: India
Concentration: Social Entrepreneurship, Strategy
GMAT 1: 620 Q41 V34
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: A newly discovered painting seems to be the work of one of two sevente  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Sep 2018, 14:11
kate565 wrote:
I think that A is not the perfect answer.
Even if we negate the statement and say that "The frame was made from wood NOT local to the region where the picture was painted", there is still possibility that Drechen painted the picture in some other region. To support the conclusion we need another assumption like "Drechen didn't paint any picture outside northern Germany".


Conclusion: This shows that the painting is most likely the work of Drechen

If we negate both the statements A and D.

Quote:
(D) The painter of the picture chose the frame for the picture
The painter of the picture DID NOT chose the frame for the picture.

If painter of the picture did not choose the frame, may be someone else did. But this doesn't impact the conclusion of the argument mentioned above.
Even if someone else choose the frame, the painting could still be the work of Drechen.

Quote:
(A) The frame was made from wood local to the region where the picture was painted.
Negation: The frame was NOT made from wood local to the region where the picture was painted.

If we go by this negation and if the frame was NOT made from wood local to the region. This may mean that wood was brought from somewhere else, but not from the region where the painting was painted. Then the conclusion "This shows that the painting is most likely the work of Drechen" falls apart. As Drechen belongs to Germany, and the wood mentioned is local to Germany.
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 14 Jul 2014
Posts: 92
Location: India
Concentration: Social Entrepreneurship, Strategy
GMAT 1: 620 Q41 V34
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: A newly discovered painting seems to be the work of one of two sevente  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Sep 2018, 01:07
3
HimanshuW11 wrote:
kate565 wrote:
I think that A is not the perfect answer.
Even if we negate the statement and say that "The frame was made from wood NOT local to the region where the picture was painted", there is still possibility that Drechen painted the picture in some other region. To support the conclusion we need another assumption like "Drechen didn't paint any picture outside northern Germany".


Conclusion: Analysis of the carved picture frame, showed that it is made of wood local to Germany. This shows that the painting is most likely the work of Drechen

If we negate both the statements A and D.

Quote:
(D) The painter of the picture chose the frame for the picture
The painter of the picture DID NOT chose the frame for the picture.

If painter of the picture did not choose the frame, may be someone else did. But this doesn't impact the conclusion of the argument mentioned above.
Even if someone else choose the frame, the painting could still be the work of Drechen.

Quote:
(A) The frame was made from wood local to the region where the picture was painted.
Negation: The frame was NOT made from wood local to the region where the picture was painted.

If we go by this negation and if the frame was NOT made from wood local to the region. This may mean that wood was brought from somewhere else, but not from the region where the painting was painted. Then the conclusion "This shows that the painting is most likely the work of Drechen" falls apart. As Drechen belongs to Germany, and the wood mentioned is local to Germany.
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 16 Sep 2011
Posts: 96
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: A newly discovered painting seems to be the work of one of two sevente  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Sep 2018, 09:37
A newly discovered painting seems to be the work of one of two seventeenth-century artists, either the northern German Johannes Drechen or the Frenchman Louis Birelle, who sometimes painted in the same style as Drechen. Analysis of the carved picture frame, which has been identified as the painting’s original seventeenth-century frame, showed that it is made of wood found widely in northern Germany at the time, but rare in the part of France where Birelle lived. This shows that the painting is most likely the work of Drechen.

Which of the following is an assumption that the argument requires?

(A) The frame was made from wood local to the region where the picture was painted.

(B) Drechen is unlikely to have ever visited the home region of Birelle in France.

(C) Sometimes a painting so resembles others of its era that no expert is able to confidently decide who painted it.

(D) The painter of the picture chose the frame for the picture.

(E) The carving style of the picture frame is not typical of any specific region of Europe.

Conclusion: painting most likely Drechen's work
Premise: painting frame made of wood in found largely in Germany

Gap: Link between made of wood vs painting done related to the same place...
A says wooden frame local to region where picture was painted....again pointing to same place....connecting evidence to conclusion..
Manager
Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 09 Jun 2014
Posts: 239
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
Schools: Tuck '19
Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: A newly discovered painting seems to be the work of one of two sevente  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Nov 2018, 04:36
anujzo wrote:
Hi can anyone explain why A is stronger choice than D? As D is also a plausible assumption because if the artist did not choose a frame then Brielle could have painted the painting and someone from Germany bought it and put a German frame around it.



It doesnt matter who choose the frame.It can be painter /his wife :)/ his company.

What matters is ,the frame was local to the place he lived.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 14 Feb 2017
Posts: 121
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 560 Q41 V26
GMAT 2: 550 Q43 V23
GPA: 2.61
WE: Management Consulting (Consulting)
CAT Tests
Re: A newly discovered painting seems to be the work of one of two sevente  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Nov 2018, 19:20
OG19 Q558 says answer choice B is the correct answer. Is this a printing error?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 27 Nov 2018
Posts: 82
A newly discovered painting seems to be the work of one of two sevente  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jan 2019, 06:32
anujzo wrote:
Hi can anyone explain why A is stronger choice than D? As D is also a plausible assumption because if the artist did not choose a frame then Brielle could have painted the painting and someone from Germany bought it and put a German frame around it.

chetan2u has a great response to this. Also note that if the painter did choose the frame, then the same outcome is still possible. Birelle could have painted the picture and put a German frame around it.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 27 Nov 2018
Posts: 82
Re: A newly discovered painting seems to be the work of one of two sevente  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jan 2019, 06:34
dcummins wrote:
OG19 Q558 says answer choice B is the correct answer. Is this a printing error?

Yes. OG19 says that (B) is the correct answer is in the answer key, but it says that (A) is the correct answer in the Answer Explanations.
(A) is the correct answer.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 27 Nov 2018
Posts: 82
Re: A newly discovered painting seems to be the work of one of two sevente  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jan 2019, 06:37
kate565 wrote:
I think that A is not the perfect answer.
Even if we negate the statement and say that "The frame was made from wood NOT local to the region where the picture was painted", there is still possibility that Drechen painted the picture in some other region. To support the conclusion we need another assumption like "Drechen didn't paint any picture outside northern Germany".

You are correct. We are relying on both assumptions. And because one of the assumptions we are relying on is option (A), then option (A) is our correct answer.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 27 Nov 2018
Posts: 82
Re: A newly discovered painting seems to be the work of one of two sevente  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jan 2019, 06:39
Devlikes wrote:
pawanCEO wrote:
A newly discovered painting seems to be the work of one of two seventeenth-century artists, either the northern German Johannes Drechen or the Frenchman Louis Birelle, who sometimes painted in the same style as Drechen. Analysis of the carved picture frame, which has been identified as the painting’s original seventeenth-century frame, showed that it is made of wood found widely in northern Germany at the time, but rare in the part of France where Birelle lived. This shows that the painting is most likely the work of Drechen.

Which of the following is an assumption that the argument requires?

(A) The frame was made from wood local to the region where the picture was painted.
(B) Drechen is unlikely to have ever visited the home region of Birelle in France.
(C) Sometimes a painting so resembles others of its era that no expert is able to confidently decide who painted it.
(D) The painter of the picture chose the frame for the picture.
(E) The carving style of the picture frame is not typical of any specific region of Europe.



I ended up choosing A through method of elimination.

Doesnt the part (highlighed in bold) in argument conflicts with the choice A assumption ? Even though that particular wood was rare in France, still it could be considered local to France. Which means it could be painted by Drechen or Birelle....

Would appreciate if someone could help me clear my above mentioned doubt,
Devansh :)

You are right. It still could have been painted by Birelle. However, (A) increases the odds that it was painted by Drechen. And our conclusion only states that it is more likely that Drechen painted the picture, not that he definitely painted the picture.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: A newly discovered painting seems to be the work of one of two sevente   [#permalink] 23 Jan 2019, 06:39

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 34 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

A newly discovered painting seems to be the work of one of two sevente

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.