Hi JM007,Reaching for 5 × 4 × 3 is natural. You're picturing three slots - a first topping, a second, a third - and filling them one by one. That's the right instinct
when the three things you're filling are genuinely different from each other. Here they aren't, and that's the whole catch.
In Case 2 you order three pizzas of the
same size, each with a different topping. Once they show up, you just have three same-sized pizzas in a box. There's no "first" pizza or "second" pizza - nothing distinguishes them except their toppings. So the order {Pepperoni, Mushroom, Olive} is
one order, no matter what sequence you list the toppings in.
But 5 × 4 × 3 counts
sequences. It treats P-M-O, M-O-P, O-P-M, ... as different orders. There are 3! = 6 ways to rearrange the same three toppings, so 5 × 4 × 3 = 60 counts every real order
6 times over. Divide that out: 60 ÷ 6 = 10 = 5C3. That's why we
select (5C3) instead of
arrange.
So when would 5 × 4 × 3 actually be correct? Only when the three pizzas are genuinely distinguishable - when each topping is attached to a specific, labeled pizza. The question would need to make the pizzas different from one another, for example:
Quote:
"...order one
small, one
medium, and one
large pizza, each with a
different topping."
Now small, medium, and large are three distinct slots. Pepperoni on the small vs. pepperoni on the large are genuinely different orders, so you
do arrange: 5 × 4 × 3 = 60 for the different-topping case.
One-line takeaway:
identical pizzas → select (5C3); labeled / different pizzas → arrange (5 × 4 × 3). The original question deliberately keeps all three the same size - that's exactly what makes it a selection, not an arrangement.
Answer: C