It is currently 19 Nov 2017, 09:32

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A poor farmer was fond of telling his children: In this

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 08 Jul 2004
Posts: 595

Kudos [?]: 281 [0], given: 0

A poor farmer was fond of telling his children: In this [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Feb 2005, 16:38
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

A poor farmer was fond of telling his children: “In this world, you are either rich or poor, and you are either honest or dishonest. All poor farmers are honest. Therefore, all rich farmers are dishonest.â€
_________________

Regards, S

Kudos [?]: 281 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 19 Nov 2004
Posts: 554

Kudos [?]: 280 [0], given: 0

Location: SF Bay Area, USA
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Feb 2005, 18:38
The conclusion is : rich farmers are dishonest

A) every honest farmer is poor:
This says that if you are honest farmer you must also be poor - can't be rich. So, no honest farmer is rich.
I think only A lets you conclude clearly that rich farmers are dishonest.

Kudos [?]: 280 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 555

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

Re: CR Farmer [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Feb 2005, 19:34
saurya_s wrote:
A poor farmer was fond of telling his children: “In this world, you are either rich or poor, and you are either honest or dishonest. All poor farmers are honest. Therefore, all rich farmers are dishonest.”
The farmer’s conclusion is properly drawn if the argument assumes that
(A) every honest farmer is poor
I was left with this.
(B) every honest person is a farmer
means that rich farmers are also honest (eliminate)
(C) everyone who is dishonest is a rich farmer
there may be some rich farmers who are not dishonest (eliminate)
(D) everyone who is poor is honest
you may still see a rich man who is honest. No connection here with a rich farmer. (eliminate)
(E) every poor person is a farmer
Nope - way out of it. (eliminate)

Hos does one approach this type of Q



I POEd my way through and arrived at A after about 6 mins.

(A) every honest farmer is poor
I was left with this.
(B) every honest person is a farmer
means that rich farmers are also honest (eliminate)
(C) everyone who is dishonest is a rich farmer
there may be some rich farmers who are not dishonest (eliminate)
(D) everyone who is poor is honest
you may still see a rich man who is honest. No connection here with a rich farmer. (eliminate)
(E) every poor person is a farmer
So, no rich farmers exist to access (eliminate)

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 Dec 2004
Posts: 294

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Location: California
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Feb 2005, 19:41
My answer is A...I think you can eliminate choices that do not have farmers and talk of people in general, that way you can get rid of B, C, D and E because really all the farmer says is all honest farmers are poor and therefore all rich farmers are dishonest....he isn't really talking about people so you cannot assume anything about people other than farmers.
_________________

"No! Try not. Do. Or do not. There is no try.

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 1430

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Feb 2005, 21:14
greenandwise wrote:
My answer is A...I think you can eliminate choices that do not have farmers and talk of people in general, that way you can get rid of B, C, D and E because really all the farmer says is all honest farmers are poor and therefore all rich farmers are dishonest....he isn't really talking about people so you cannot assume anything about people other than farmers.


U r right all choices other than "A" are out of scope. Hence "A".

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Oct 2004
Posts: 246

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Feb 2005, 12:20
A for me.

In the qtn stem the author says that all poor farmers are honest and then goes ahead and says therefore all dishonest farmers are rich. This would be true only if all honest farmers were poor. And becoz it is already mentioned that all poor farmers are honest.

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2228

Kudos [?]: 385 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Feb 2005, 10:11
This one should not cost you 6 minutes. The type of reasoning is this:

A->B doesn't mean B->A.
But A->B does mean non B-> non A. eg. If all birds are white, this one is not white, that means this one must not be a bird.
Same with our question. If all rich farmers are liers, it must mean all the non liers (honest people) cannot be a rich farmer.

Kudos [?]: 385 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2004
Posts: 893

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Feb 2005, 07:41
HongHu wrote:
This one should not cost you 6 minutes. The type of reasoning is this:

A->B doesn't mean B->A.
But A->B does mean non B-> non A. eg. If all birds are white, this one is not white, that means this one must not be a bird.
Same with our question. If all rich farmers are liers, it must mean all the non liers (honest people) cannot be a rich farmer.


unparalleled example...
Thanks HongHu.. :thanks

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 555

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Feb 2005, 10:52
jpv wrote:
HongHu wrote:
This one should not cost you 6 minutes. The type of reasoning is this:

A->B doesn't mean B->A.
But A->B does mean non B-> non A. eg. If all birds are white, this one is not white, that means this one must not be a bird.
Same with our question. If all rich farmers are liers, it must mean all the non liers (honest people) cannot be a rich farmer.


unparalleled example...
Thanks HongHu.. :thanks


For more help on this kind of question and how to answer it HonHu style, please see http://www.novapress.net/gmat/strategies.html

Real good CR stuff there.

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2004
Posts: 893

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Feb 2005, 17:00
Arsene_Wenger wrote:
jpv wrote:
HongHu wrote:
This one should not cost you 6 minutes. The type of reasoning is this:

A->B doesn't mean B->A.
But A->B does mean non B-> non A. eg. If all birds are white, this one is not white, that means this one must not be a bird.
Same with our question. If all rich farmers are liers, it must mean all the non liers (honest people) cannot be a rich farmer.


unparalleled example...
Thanks HongHu.. :thanks


For more help on this kind of question and how to answer it HonHu style, please see http://www.novapress.net/gmat/strategies.html

Real good CR stuff there.


that was nice stuff.. cheers buddy... :thanks

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5032

Kudos [?]: 453 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Feb 2005, 19:32
Poor famer:
P In this world you are either rich or poor
P You are either honest or dishonest
P All poor farmers are honest
C Therefore all rich famers are dishonest

We need something to make the conclusion work. I'll take out (C), (D) because it uses 'everyone'. The passage is limited to only farmer, not everyone.
(E) says every poor person, not every poor farmer. So I'll take out (E) as well.
Same thing with (B). It says every honest person.

So (A) is the most logical. It reverses the cause and effect statement in the arguement and say that the conclusion works both ways.

I'll pick (A). Didn't take me 6 minutes though. :-D

Kudos [?]: 453 [0], given: 0

  [#permalink] 23 Feb 2005, 19:32
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A poor farmer was fond of telling his children: In this

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.