It is currently 23 Oct 2017, 10:53

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A public health organization has proposed preventing further

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
G
Status: It always seems impossible until it's done!!
Joined: 29 Aug 2012
Posts: 984

Kudos [?]: 1463 [0], given: 270

Location: India
GMAT 1: 680 Q47 V34
WE: General Management (Aerospace and Defense)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
A public health organization has proposed preventing further [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Nov 2014, 04:36
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  25% (medium)

Question Stats:

76% (01:36) correct 24% (01:49) wrong based on 270 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

A public health organization has proposed preventing further degradation of air quality through tougher emissions standards on automobiles. The proposed standards will decrease the incidence of asthma and other respiratory ailments. Tougher standards than those that are currently in place, however, will require expensive modifications to automobiles now on the road and will add to the cost of new automobiles. The costs of further reducing emissions will outweigh the medical costs saved as a result of the decrease in asthma attacks and other respiratory problems. Therefore, there is no economic rationale for requiring further reductions in automobile emissions.

Which of the following, if true, would undermine the conclusion that there is no economic rationale for requiring further reductions in automobile emissions?

A. In matters of public health, economic factors should not control the decision making process.

B. The increase in the price of new automobiles under the proposed standards will be less than the cost of modifying existing automobiles.

C. The medical costs of treating respiratory illnesses are expected to decrease in the next decade.

D. The modifications to automobiles that are required under the proposed emissions standards will be less expensive than many modifications that consumers chose to make on a voluntary basis.

E. Other costs, such as lost wages, incurred by those who suffer from respiratory illness caused by automobile emissions are far greater than the medical costs they incur.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Become a GMAT Club Premium member to avail lot of discounts

Kudos [?]: 1463 [0], given: 270

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Sep 2010
Posts: 831

Kudos [?]: 283 [0], given: 61

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: A public health organization has proposed preventing further [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Nov 2014, 05:00
E it is: Other costs, such as lost wages, incurred by those who suffer from respiratory illness caused by automobile emissions are far greater than the medical costs they incur. ------------>undermines the conclusion by stating that "other costs" associated with this thing can weigh in to counter the "economic" angle being put in the argument !!

Kudos [?]: 283 [0], given: 61

2 KUDOS received
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 03 Feb 2013
Posts: 942

Kudos [?]: 1062 [2], given: 548

Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.88
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Reviews Badge
Re: A public health organization has proposed preventing further [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Nov 2014, 05:20
2
This post received
KUDOS
Increase in cost to reduce pollution > decrease in cost for medical costs as a result of the decrease in asthma attacks and other respiratory problems
Conclusion : Norms to reduce the pollution is not required

Weaken.

A. In matters of public health, economic factors should not control the decision making process - This is an opinion and cannot undermine the conclusion

B. The increase in the price of new automobiles under the proposed standards will be less than the cost of modifying existing automobiles - OFS

C. The medical costs of treating respiratory illnesses are expected to decrease in the next decade - Supports the argument

D. The modifications to automobiles that are required under the proposed emissions standards will be less expensive than many modifications that consumers chose to make on a voluntary basis. - OFS

E. Other costs, such as lost wages, incurred by those who suffer from respiratory illness caused by automobile emissions are far greater than the medical costs they incur. - Correct
_________________

Thanks,
Kinjal
My Debrief : http://gmatclub.com/forum/hardwork-never-gets-unrewarded-for-ever-189267.html#p1449379
My Application Experience : http://gmatclub.com/forum/hardwork-never-gets-unrewarded-for-ever-189267-40.html#p1516961
Linkedin : https://www.linkedin.com/in/kinjal-das/

Please click on Kudos, if you think the post is helpful

Kudos [?]: 1062 [2], given: 548

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 484

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 342

Concentration: Finance, Marketing
CAT Tests
Re: A public health organization has proposed preventing further [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Aug 2016, 04:53
A public health organization has proposed preventing further degradation of air quality through tougher emissions standards on automobiles.


The proposed standards will decrease the incidence of asthma and other respiratory ailments.

Tougher standards than those that are currently in place, however, will require expensive modifications to automobiles now on the road and will add to the cost of new automobiles.

The costs of further reducing emissions will outweigh the medical costs saved as a result of the decrease in asthma attacks and other respiratory problems.


Therefore, there is no economic rationale for requiring further reductions in automobile emissions.


economic rationale => country will save something out of it.

what if we can introduce productivity factor in the whole scenrio. People more healthy => more efficient ,more productive => economy growth.

what if we can connect "reducing emission" to "high export" : Like some nation that import from the nation/ economy we talking about, and if they introduuce tougher emissions standards that matches to their own standard, they will buy from the the nation/ economy.



Which of the following, if true, would undermine the conclusion that there is no economic rationale for requiring further reductions in automobile emissions?


E. Other costs, such as lost wages, incurred by those who suffer from respiratory illness caused by automobile emissions are far greater than the medical costs they incur.

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 342

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 04 Feb 2017
Posts: 57

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 45

GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: A public health organization has proposed preventing further [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Sep 2017, 05:07
I got this Question... Still can anyone please explain what is wrong with Option A....

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 45

Director
Director
avatar
G
Joined: 14 Nov 2014
Posts: 599

Kudos [?]: 94 [0], given: 46

Re: A public health organization has proposed preventing further [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Sep 2017, 09:18
pratik1709 wrote:
I got this Question... Still can anyone please explain what is wrong with Option A....



conclusion ==there is no economic rationale for requiring further reductions in automobile emissions--we need to weaken

we need to prove that there is some economic benefit , if laws are amended or added ...

Now A is simply telling --economic factors should not control the decision making process.-- it does not weaken conclusion. it is not pointing that if laws are amended , there will be some benefit ...As rightly said earlier , this is kind of opinion ..

Kudos [?]: 94 [0], given: 46

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 04 Feb 2017
Posts: 57

Kudos [?]: 7 [1], given: 45

GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: A public health organization has proposed preventing further [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Sep 2017, 10:28
1
This post received
KUDOS
Hi , sobby

Why can't Opinion be correct answer choice?

Kudos [?]: 7 [1], given: 45

1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
G
Joined: 14 Nov 2014
Posts: 599

Kudos [?]: 94 [1], given: 46

Re: A public health organization has proposed preventing further [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Sep 2017, 10:42
1
This post received
KUDOS
pratik1709 wrote:
Hi , sobby

Why can't Opinion be correct answer choice?


lets take it this way :

Me:there is no economic rationale for requiring further reductions in automobile emissions.--means no monetary benefit....

Now u have to undermine my statement..Giving at least some counter point that can prove yes , we have monetary benefit

You :In matters of public health, economic factors should not control the decision making process

My question:

Now are u undermining my argument ??have u given any reason that reduction in emission is beneficial...???just you are putting a point of view ...

concentrate on question stem , what we need to undermine ....Then u ll see , u are actually talking some thing not specific.

Kudos [?]: 94 [1], given: 46

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 04 Feb 2017
Posts: 57

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 45

GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
A public health organization has proposed preventing further [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Sep 2017, 10:52
sobby wrote:
pratik1709 wrote:
Hi , sobby

Why can't Opinion be correct answer choice?








lets take it this way :

Me:there is no economic rationale for requiring further reductions in automobile emissions.--means no monetary benefit....

Now u have to undermine my statement..Giving at least some counter point that can prove yes , we have monetary benefit

You :In matters of public health, economic factors should not control the decision making process

My question:

Now are u undermining my argument ??have u given any reason that reduction in emission is beneficial...???just you are putting a point of view ...

concentrate on question stem , what we need to undermine ....Then u ll see , u are actually talking some thing not specific.




sobby

Thanks buddy. Got your reasoning..

Just to cement my understanding, this is specific case we are talking about. However in general, do we have kind rule that opinion can't be correct answer choice? Is that case?

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 45

Director
Director
avatar
G
Joined: 14 Nov 2014
Posts: 599

Kudos [?]: 94 [0], given: 46

Re: A public health organization has proposed preventing further [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Sep 2017, 11:09
pratik1709 wrote:
sobby wrote:
pratik1709 wrote:
Hi , sobby

Why can't Opinion be correct answer choice?








lets take it this way :

Me:there is no economic rationale for requiring further reductions in automobile emissions.--means no monetary benefit....

Now u have to undermine my statement..Giving at least some counter point that can prove yes , we have monetary benefit

You :In matters of public health, economic factors should not control the decision making process

My question:

Now are u undermining my argument ??have u given any reason that reduction in emission is beneficial...???just you are putting a point of view ...

concentrate on question stem , what we need to undermine ....Then u ll see , u are actually talking some thing not specific.




sobby

Thanks buddy. Got your reasoning..

Just to cement my understanding, this is specific case we are talking about. However in general, do we have kind rule that opinion can't be correct answer choice? Is that case?


No , we don't have rule as such ...Here we have specific conclusion to weaken so ,option A was out of context ...

Kudos [?]: 94 [0], given: 46

Re: A public health organization has proposed preventing further   [#permalink] 06 Sep 2017, 11:09
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A public health organization has proposed preventing further

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.