Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 21:28 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 21:28
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Sub 505 Level|   Resolve Paradox|                  
User avatar
krish
Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Last visit: 27 Jan 2006
Posts: 111
Own Kudos:
153
 [29]
Posts: 111
Kudos: 153
 [29]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
22
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,265
Own Kudos:
76,983
 [10]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,265
Kudos: 76,983
 [10]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
srijay007
Joined: 05 May 2004
Last visit: 05 Jul 2006
Posts: 337
Own Kudos:
240
 [3]
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 337
Kudos: 240
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
toughmat
Joined: 19 Apr 2011
Last visit: 13 Nov 2011
Posts: 58
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 58
Kudos: 11
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
There is no conclusion in the argument. Resolve paradox questions dont contain a conclusion in teh argument
User avatar
siddhans
Joined: 29 Jan 2011
Last visit: 04 Sep 2012
Posts: 158
Own Kudos:
786
 [2]
Given Kudos: 87
Posts: 158
Kudos: 786
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
toughmat
There is no conclusion in the argument. Resolve paradox questions dont contain a conclusion in teh argument
How do we identify that its a resolve the paradox question? the question stem says => " Which of the following, if true, best explains the reason
for the apparent discrepancy described above? "
User avatar
dentobizz
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 23 Jul 2010
Last visit: 12 Jun 2021
Posts: 401
Own Kudos:
1,939
 [2]
Given Kudos: 370
GPA: 3.5
WE:Business Development (Healthcare/Pharmaceuticals)
Posts: 401
Kudos: 1,939
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
suhasancd
Joined: 17 Jul 2013
Last visit: 21 Apr 2020
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 81
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
GPA: 3.5
WE:Consulting (Computer Software)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
krish
A report that many apples contain a cancer-causing preservative called Alar apparently had little effect on consumers. Few consumers planned to change their
apple-buying habits as a result of the report. Nonetheless, sales of apples in grocery stores fell sharply in March, a month after the report was issued.


Which of the following, if true, best explains the reason for the apparent discrepancy described above?


(A) In March, many grocers removed apples from their shelves in order to demonstrate concern about their customers’ health.
(B) Because of a growing number of food-safety warnings, consumers in March were indifferent to such warnings.
(C) The report was delivered on television and also appeared in newspapers.
(D) The report did not mention that any other fruit contains Alar, although the preservative is used on other fruit.
(E) Public health officials did not believe that apples posed a health threat because only minute traces of Alar were present in affected apples.


how do we eliminate option B ?

The argument says few consumers changed their apple buying habits. And option B says consumers were indifferent to food-safety warnings.

Oh.. :!: so food safety warnings are not related to these apple reports at all..

So option B is irrelevant ?
avatar
HarishLearner
Joined: 23 Aug 2013
Last visit: 06 Dec 2021
Posts: 37
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 37
Kudos: 16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
suhasancd
krish
A report that many apples contain a cancer-causing preservative called Alar apparently had little effect on consumers. Few consumers planned to change their
apple-buying habits as a result of the report. Nonetheless, sales of apples in grocery stores fell sharply in March, a month after the report was issued.


Which of the following, if true, best explains the reason for the apparent discrepancy described above?


(A) In March, many grocers removed apples from their shelves in order to demonstrate concern about their customers’ health.
(B) Because of a growing number of food-safety warnings, consumers in March were indifferent to such warnings.
(C) The report was delivered on television and also appeared in newspapers.
(D) The report did not mention that any other fruit contains Alar, although the preservative is used on other fruit.
(E) Public health officials did not believe that apples posed a health threat because only minute traces of Alar were present in affected apples.


how do we eliminate option B ?

The argument says few consumers changed their apple buying habits. And option B says consumers were indifferent to food-safety warnings.

Oh.. :!: so food safety warnings are not related to these apple reports at all..

So option B is irrelevant ?

The argument already says the warning had little effect on consumers. Choice B is just reiterating it and giving one more reason for the indifference. But it does not resolve the paradox. So we reject it.
User avatar
saby1410
Joined: 06 Feb 2017
Last visit: 10 Jun 2025
Posts: 183
Own Kudos:
23
 [1]
Given Kudos: 93
Location: India
Posts: 183
Kudos: 23
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasKarishma

option b-
it's incorrect becoz of generalizing of food safety warnings as we are talking about warnings from apple and we don't know whether people were indifferent in what aspect it's either of other food warnings or warnings from apple.Also we don't know about indifferent whether it's opposing or in favour.

other question if argument says sales declined in terms of percentage then we can't chose option A Am i right?

pls give your analysis
avatar
Suneha123
Joined: 29 Jan 2019
Last visit: 05 Apr 2021
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
13
 [2]
Given Kudos: 3
Status:BDM
Posts: 19
Kudos: 13
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasKarishma
krish
A report that many apples contain a cancer-causing preservative called Alar apparently had little effect on consumers. Few consumers planned to change their apple-buying habits as a result of the report. Nonetheless, sales of apples in grocery stores fell sharply in March, a month after the report was issued.

Which of the following, if true, best explains the reason for the apparent discrepancy described above?


(A) In March, many grocers removed apples from their shelves in order to demonstrate concern about their customers' health.

(B) Because of a growing number of food-safety warnings, consumers in March were indifferent to such warnings.

(C) The report was delivered on television and also appeared in newspapers.

(D) The report did not mention that any other fruit contains Alar, although the preservative is used on other fruit.

(E) Public health officials did not believe that apples posed a health threat because only minute traces of Alar were present in affected apples.

This is an explain the paradox question.

Paradox
- A negative report on apples did not impact consumers. Consumers planned to keep their habits unchanged.
- Still, next month sales of apples in grocery stores fell sharply

This is odd, right? If consumers planned to buy same number of apples, why did the sales fall sharply?
We need something that can explain why sales fell even though consumers were willing to buy.

(A) In March, many grocers removed apples from their shelves in order to demonstrate concern about their customers' health.

So this tells us the reason March saw fall in sales. Grocers stopped selling apples. So even though people wanted to buy, they couldn't. Hence the sales fell. This explains our paradox.

(B) Because of a growing number of food-safety warnings, consumers in March were indifferent to such warnings.

This tells us why people ignored the negative report. That doesn't help us figure out why sales fell despite consumers interest remaining same.

(C) The report was delivered on television and also appeared in newspapers.

Irrelevant.

(D) The report did not mention that any other fruit contains Alar, although the preservative is used on other fruit.

Irrelevant

(E) Public health officials did not believe that apples posed a health threat because only minute traces of Alar were present in affected apples.

Again, doesn't explain why sales fell.

Answer (A)

What if, option C was like this - Unlike in Feb, the report was delivered on television and also appeared in newspapers in March. Then it can be an answer, right?
User avatar
mSKR
Joined: 14 Aug 2019
Last visit: 10 Mar 2024
Posts: 1,290
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 381
Location: Hong Kong
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GPA: 3.81
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
Posts: 1,290
Kudos: 937
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Suneha123
VeritasKarishma
krish
A report that many apples contain a cancer-causing preservative called Alar apparently had little effect on consumers. Few consumers planned to change their apple-buying habits as a result of the report. Nonetheless, sales of apples in grocery stores fell sharply in March, a month after the report was issued.

Which of the following, if true, best explains the reason for the apparent discrepancy described above?


(A) In March, many grocers removed apples from their shelves in order to demonstrate concern about their customers' health.

(B) Because of a growing number of food-safety warnings, consumers in March were indifferent to such warnings.

(C) The report was delivered on television and also appeared in newspapers.

(D) The report did not mention that any other fruit contains Alar, although the preservative is used on other fruit.

(E) Public health officials did not believe that apples posed a health threat because only minute traces of Alar were present in affected apples.

This is an explain the paradox question.

Paradox
- A negative report on apples did not impact consumers. Consumers planned to keep their habits unchanged.
- Still, next month sales of apples in grocery stores fell sharply

This is odd, right? If consumers planned to buy same number of apples, why did the sales fall sharply?
We need something that can explain why sales fell even though consumers were willing to buy.

(A) In March, many grocers removed apples from their shelves in order to demonstrate concern about their customers' health.

So this tells us the reason March saw fall in sales. Grocers stopped selling apples. So even though people wanted to buy, they couldn't. Hence the sales fell. This explains our paradox.

(B) Because of a growing number of food-safety warnings, consumers in March were indifferent to such warnings.

This tells us why people ignored the negative report. That doesn't help us figure out why sales fell despite consumers interest remaining same.

(C) The report was delivered on television and also appeared in newspapers.

Irrelevant.

(D) The report did not mention that any other fruit contains Alar, although the preservative is used on other fruit.

Irrelevant

(E) Public health officials did not believe that apples posed a health threat because only minute traces of Alar were present in affected apples.

Again, doesn't explain why sales fell.

Answer (A)

What if, option C was like this - Unlike in Feb, the report was delivered on television and also appeared in newspapers in March. Then it can be an answer, right?

still not because it is given that Few consumers planned to change their apple-buying habits as a result of the report
User avatar
mohitwadhwa28
Joined: 06 Sep 2016
Last visit: 24 Oct 2023
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,531
Location: India
Concentration: International Business, Strategy
GPA: 3.01
WE:Engineering (Consulting)
Posts: 25
Kudos: 12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
siddhans
toughmat
There is no conclusion in the argument. Resolve paradox questions dont contain a conclusion in teh argument
How do we identify that its a resolve the paradox question? the question stem says => " Which of the following, if true, best explains the reason
for the apparent discrepancy described above? "


Apparent discrepancy means seeming difference between the two things which are contradictory to each other in the argument. This defines it as paradox only. Please check for dictionary meaning of paradox.
User avatar
Shyna_
Joined: 08 Oct 2023
Last visit: 10 Apr 2024
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
7
 [1]
Given Kudos: 14
Posts: 11
Kudos: 7
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Per the experts, Option A is correct.
My reasoning of why A does not sound like the most accurate response:

If the grocers removed apples from their shelves, how can we say 'sales of apples in grocery stores fell sharply'.
The paragraph should have instead mentioned that the usage of apples declined, instead of sales.
If the grocers removed the apples, there were no apples to be sold. So the sales did not decline, rather the supply declined whereas the demand remained the same.
User avatar
parthh1234
Joined: 16 Sep 2023
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 43
Posts: 7
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I had the same reasoning and rejected option A. How can sales of something get dropped when you are not even selling it?
Any expert here to throw some light on this reasoning?
Shyna_
Per the experts, Option A is correct.
My reasoning of why A does not sound like the most accurate response:

If the grocers removed apples from their shelves, how can we say 'sales of apples in grocery stores fell sharply'.
The paragraph should have instead mentioned that the usage of apples declined, instead of sales.
If the grocers removed the apples, there were no apples to be sold. So the sales did not decline, rather the supply declined whereas the demand remained the same.
User avatar
GMATQuizMaster
Joined: 17 Jun 2025
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 37
Own Kudos:
18
 [1]
Given Kudos: 3
Status:Prep Company
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 37
Kudos: 18
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hey parthh1234,

Let me try to help.


"sales of apples in grocery stores fell sharply in March" means that if let's say the grocery stores sold 100 apples in the month of Feb, they sold much less, may be 50 apples in the month of March.
Even if this was planned and intentional- the reduction did happen.

The information given to us is for all grocery stores combined. Had it been a report by an individual grocery store, your logic would have been applicable.


Hope it answers your question.

parthh1234
I had the same reasoning and rejected option A. How can sales of something get dropped when you are not even selling it?
Any expert here to throw some light on this reasoning?

Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts