GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 21 Mar 2019, 11:32

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 and 1996

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

 
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 21 Mar 2017
Posts: 138
Location: India
GMAT 1: 560 Q48 V20
WE: Other (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 and 1996  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Dec 2017, 10:26
Hi?

Please correct my reasoning abt A.

Is it wrong because a verbing should be able to make sense with the subject of the clause i.e Creature of seabed.
And according to it the creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, and this possibly resulting from increasing sea temp.
so it would be wrong as it doesn't make sense.
_________________

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
When nothing seem to help, I would go and look at a Stonecutter hammering away at his rock perhaps a hundred time without as much as a crack showing in it.
Yet at the hundred and first blow it would split in two.
And I knew it was not that blow that did it, But all that had gone Before
.

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
S
Joined: 30 Oct 2017
Posts: 212
Re: A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 and 1996  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Dec 2017, 19:50
1
Prashant10692 wrote:
Hi?

Please correct my reasoning abt A.

Is it wrong because a verbing should be able to make sense with the subject of the clause i.e Creature of seabed.
And according to it the creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, and this possibly resulting from increasing sea temp.
so it would be wrong as it doesn't make sense.


Hi Prashant10692!

I'm happy to jump in for Mike :-) Yes, that's definitely a way that we could think about this! That is correct :-) If we are referring to the entire clause (rather than only the subject of the clause), then we want to use something like "a fact which resulted from", or "as a result of", which choice B correctly uses.

-Carolyn
_________________

Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
P
Joined: 24 Oct 2016
Posts: 325
GMAT 1: 670 Q46 V36
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V38
Re: A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 and 1996  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Nov 2018, 20:45
laxieqv wrote:
A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 and 1996 revealed that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly resulting from increasing sea surface temperatures during the same period.




(A) that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly resulting from increasing - Meaning: Food supplies does not cause suffering.

(B) that creatures of the seabed were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, possibly as a result of an increase in

(C) that creatures of the seabed were suffering because of food supplies, which were dwindling possibly as a result of increasing - Meaning: Food supplies does not cause suffering.

(D) creatures of the seabed that were suffering from food supplies that were dwindling, possibly resulting from an increase in - Meaning issue. "that" should come before "creatures of the seabed".

(E) creatures of the seabed that were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, which possibly resulted from increasing - Meaning issue. "that" should come before "creatures of the seabed".
_________________

Most Comprehensive Article on How to Score a 700+ on the GMAT (NEW)
Verb Tenses Simplified

If you found my post useful, KUDOS are much appreciated. Giving Kudos is a great way to thank and motivate contributors, without costing you anything.

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 10 May 2018
Posts: 40
Re: A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 and 1996  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jan 2019, 13:01
laxieqv wrote:
A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 and 1996 revealed that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly resulting from increasing sea surface temperatures during the same period.


(A) that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly resulting from increasing

(B) that creatures of the seabed were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, possibly as a result of an increase in

(C) that creatures of the seabed were suffering because of food supplies, which were dwindling possibly as a result of increasing

(D) creatures of the seabed that were suffering from food supplies that were dwindling, possibly resulting from an increase in

(E) creatures of the seabed that were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, which possibly resulted from increasing


Verbal Question of The Day: Day 34: Sentence Correction


Subscribe to GMAT Question of the Day: E-mail | RSS
For All QOTD Questions Click Here


Spoiler: :: nytimes article
https://www.nytimes.com/1999/06/01/science/the-diverse-creatures-of-the-deep-may-be-starving.html

Hordes of creatures living in the hidden depths of the deep sea are in danger of starving to death, scientists report. This remote part of the planet is believed to harbor millions of undiscovered species, an unknown number of which may be in crisis.

A study of food supply and demand miles down in the North Pacific between 1989 and 1996 found that creatures of the seabed suffered from growing food shortages. A likely culprit, scientists say, is a documented increase in sea surface temperatures during the same period.

''If the food deficit continues, it is going to change the configuration of the deep-sea communities,'' said Kenneth L. Smith Jr., a biologist at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in San Diego and a co-author of the report, which was published recently in Science. ''Some species will die out while those that can survive on a very low food supply will still be able to maintain themselves.''



A, C, and D are wrong because they imply that the creatures are suffering from the food supplies, not the fact that they were dwindling. E is awkwardly phrased, so B is the best option.
Director
Director
avatar
G
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Posts: 589
Re: A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 and 1996  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jan 2019, 01:26
[quote="laxieqv"]A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 and 1996 revealed that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly resulting from increasing sea surface temperatures during the same period.


(A) that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly resulting from increasing

(B) that creatures of the seabed were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, possibly as a result of an increase in

(C) that creatures of the seabed were suffering because of food supplies, which were dwindling possibly as a result of increasing

(D) creatures of the seabed that were suffering from food supplies that were dwindling, possibly resulting from an increase in

(E) creatures of the seabed that were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, which possibly resulted from increasing

if gmat test us meaning, this means we have to solve meaning problem more than realize the grammatical sentence pattern. this means we will face 2 patterns of sentence which are both grammatical but only one of them is logic.

both "reveal +noun" and 'reveal +that clause" exist in english grammat. So, both "reveal the creatures" and "reveal that creatures suffer" are grammatical. but the point is which pattern is logic in the context of sentence.

when the object of a verb is changed from an idea prepresented by "that-clause" to a concrete phisical thing or animal presented by a concreted noun, the meaning is changed and can be illogic. i do not say that this change alway makes an illogic meaning. i will give an example latter.

it is not logic to say " a study reveal creature that were suffering" but it is logic to say " a study reveal that creatures were suffering". similarly, it is not logic to say that " creatures were suffering because of food suply" . it is logic to say " creatures were suffering because food supply is dwindling"

it is also logic to say

creatures were suffering because of the bad weather

notice that we use a noun "bad weather", not a "that clause" to complement sentence. I want to say that both noun and "that clause" as object can be correct , depending on logic.

the point of this problem is the change of object from an "that clause" to a noun which makes an illogic meaning.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 and 1996   [#permalink] 17 Jan 2019, 01:26

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 25 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 and 1996

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron
Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.