GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 22 Sep 2018, 04:37

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

A team of German scientists recently concluded a ten year study on the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
P
Status: To infinity and beyond
Joined: 26 Sep 2017
Posts: 262
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q50 V30
GPA: 3.31
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Reviews Badge
A team of German scientists recently concluded a ten year study on the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jan 2018, 12:23
1
1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  65% (hard)

Question Stats:

54% (01:45) correct 46% (02:13) wrong based on 98 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

A team of German scientists recently concluded a ten year study on the relationship between red or white meat consumption and the risk of intestinal cancer; the study revealed that those who ate on average more than one serving per week of red meat had 44 percent less risk for developing Adenocarcinoma, the most common form of intestinal cancer. Though all previous studies on the relationship between red meat and the prevalence of intestinal cancer have been inconclusive, the German scientists attribute the lower rate of intestinal cancer to increased intake of myoglobin. White meat is rarely rich in myoglobin, and those in the study who ate white meat had the same risk for developing Adenocarcinoma as those who ate no meat at all.

In the statement above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?



A.The first is an opinion that is supported by the argument; the second is one part of the information uncovered in the study.
B.The first presents the quandary the scientists are attempting to solve; the second is the result of that quandary.
C.The first is a fact that goes against the argument that is being presented; the second is one element of a logical argument in support of the scientists claim.
D.The first is a claim in support of the argument; the second is a piece of evidence against the argument.
E.The first is an explanation advocated by the argument; the second is a finding used to challenge that explanation.

Source:Crackverbal

_________________

Please give kudos if you like my post.Thanks

Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 20 Feb 2017
Posts: 88
Location: United States
Premium Member
A team of German scientists recently concluded a ten year study on the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jan 2018, 13:15
1
devikeerthansr wrote:
A team of German scientists recently concluded a ten year study on the relationship between red or white meat consumption and the risk of intestinal cancer; the study revealed that those who ate on average more than one serving per week of red meat had 44 percent less risk for developing Adenocarcinoma, the most common form of intestinal cancer. Though all previous studies on the relationship between red meat and the prevalence of intestinal cancer have been inconclusive, the German scientists attribute the lower rate of intestinal cancer to increased intake of myoglobin. White meat is rarely rich in myoglobin, and those in the study who ate white meat had the same risk for developing Adenocarcinoma as those who ate no meat at all.

In the statement above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?



A.The first is an opinion that is supported by the argument; the second is one part of the information uncovered in the study.
B.The first presents the quandary the scientists are attempting to solve; the second is the result of that quandary.
C.The first is a fact that goes against the argument that is being presented; the second is one element of a logical argument in support of the scientists claim.
D.The first is a claim in support of the argument; the second is a piece of evidence against the argument.
E.The first is an explanation advocated by the argument; the second is a finding used to challenge that explanation.

Source:Crackverbal


BF1 - Fact: Study results were inconclusive.
BF2 - A fact supporting why eating white meat may not have any impact on prevalence of intestinal cancer.

A - BF1 is a fact, not opinion.
B - BF2 is not the result of the study. It is a separate finding.
C - BF1 and BF2 - correct answer. BF1 goes against the argument as results are inconclusive.
D - BF1 - not supporting the argument, BF2 - wrong
E - BF2 is not challenging BF1 findings.
_________________

*****************************************************************
Kudos are always welcome.

A team of German scientists recently concluded a ten year study on the &nbs [#permalink] 12 Jan 2018, 13:15
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A team of German scientists recently concluded a ten year study on the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.