kskumar
avigutman Please add your view in this Problem
kskumar here's how I think through this problem.
Start with statement 2, as I don't know how it could possibly be enough to answer the question. You see, when I look at c+2, I ask myself what impact does the +2 have here? I don't even know whether it's 2cm or 2 feet or 2km... I have no way of knowing whether +2 is a lot or a little in the context of this triangle. The fact that a+b > c goes without saying, so the only new information provided by statement 2 is information for which I totally lack context and is therefore useless.
So, I've eliminated BD and I'm ready to evaluate statement 1.
Statement 1 provides the 2-dimensional ratio for the three sides (3:4:6), which I appreciate because that fits well with the Pythagorean theorem.
If the squares of the two smaller sides are 3 and 4 ratio units respectively, the Pythagorean theorem tells us that the square of the third side would have to be exactly 7 ratio units for this triangle to be a right triangle. Since it's less than 7 ratio units (it's 6 ratio units), I can conclude that the angle across from the longest side is less than 90 degrees, and the other angles have to be smaller still, so we get a definitive YES and I pick A.