Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack
GMAT Club

 It is currently 24 Mar 2017, 07:26

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# A valid argument is often defined as one in which it is not

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 27 May 2008
Posts: 544
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 327 [2] , given: 0

A valid argument is often defined as one in which it is not [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jun 2008, 00:38
2
KUDOS
19
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

34% (02:25) correct 66% (01:30) wrong based on 990 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A valid argument is often defined as one in which it is not possible for all the premises to be true and the conclusion false. A circular argument is sometimes defined as one in which one of the premises is identical to the conclusion.

From these definitions we can infer that...

(A) Every circular argument is valid as long as its premises are true.
(B) Every valid argument is circular.
(C) No circular argument is valid.
(D) Some circular arguments are valid, and some are not.
(E) Some circular arguments are not valid, and some valid arguments are not circular.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
New!
Director
Joined: 25 Oct 2006
Posts: 645
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 530 [1] , given: 6

### Show Tags

29 Jun 2008, 01:17
1
KUDOS
IMO D.

Few Premises are valid and few are not within Valid arguments(VA). But conclusion is valid(not false).
in circular argument(CA) one of the premise is identical with conclusion.
Therefore, CA with one valid premise(identical) is a valid VA and some CA without identical premise is invalid VA. Hence D.
_________________

If You're Not Living On The Edge, You're Taking Up Too Much Space

GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 1180
Followers: 427

Kudos [?]: 1554 [2] , given: 4

### Show Tags

29 Jun 2008, 06:01
2
KUDOS
Expert's post
durgesh79 wrote:
A circular argument is sometimes defined as one in which one of the premises is identical to the conclusion.

So, in a circular argument, if the premises are all true, the conclusion must be true: the conclusion is the same as one of the premises.

durgesh79 wrote:
A valid argument is often defined as one in which it is not possible for all the premises to be true and the conclusion false.

Since the conclusion of a circular argument is the same as one of the premises, if the premises are all true, the conclusion cannot be false. Thus, circular arguments are 'valid arguments', according to the definitions. A.
_________________

GMAT Tutor in Toronto

If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

Manager
Joined: 22 Jun 2008
Posts: 101
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 107 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Jun 2008, 06:27
IanStewart wrote:
durgesh79 wrote:
A circular argument is sometimes defined as one in which one of the premises is identical to the conclusion.

So, in a circular argument, if the premises are all true, the conclusion must be true: the conclusion is the same as one of the premises.

durgesh79 wrote:
A valid argument is often defined as one in which it is not possible for all the premises to be true and the conclusion false.

Since the conclusion of a circular argument is the same as one of the premises, if the premises are all true, the conclusion cannot be false. Thus, circular arguments are 'valid arguments', according to the definitions. A.

Manager
Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 87
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 168 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Jun 2008, 06:52
A circular argument is sometimes defined as one in which one of the premises is identical to the conclusion.

So, in a circular argument, if the premises are all true, the conclusion must be true: the conclusion is the same as one of the premises.

durgesh79 wrote:
A valid argument is often defined as one in which it is not possible for all the premises to be true and the conclusion false.

Since the conclusion of a circular argument is the same as one of the premises, if the premises are all true, the conclusion cannot be false. Thus, circular arguments are 'valid arguments', according to the definitions. A.
durgesh79 wrote:
A circular argument is sometimes defined as one in which one of the premises is identical to the conclusion.

So, in a circular argument, if the premises are all true, the conclusion must be true: the conclusion is the same as one of the premises.

durgesh79 wrote:
A valid argument is often defined as one in which it is not possible for all the premises to be true and the conclusion false.

Since the conclusion of a circular argument is the same as one of the premises, if the premises are all true, the conclusion cannot be false. Thus, circular arguments are 'valid arguments', according to the definitions. A.

Hi,

Shouldn't the above explanation also make option D right. ?
D. Some circular arguments are valid, and some are not.
Manager
Joined: 22 Jun 2008
Posts: 101
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 107 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Jun 2008, 07:04
MamtaKrishnia wrote:
A circular argument is sometimes defined as one in which one of the premises is identical to the conclusion.

So, in a circular argument, if the premises are all true, the conclusion must be true: the conclusion is the same as one of the premises.

durgesh79 wrote:
A valid argument is often defined as one in which it is not possible for all the premises to be true and the conclusion false.

Since the conclusion of a circular argument is the same as one of the premises, if the premises are all true, the conclusion cannot be false. Thus, circular arguments are 'valid arguments', according to the definitions. A.
durgesh79 wrote:
A circular argument is sometimes defined as one in which one of the premises is identical to the conclusion.

So, in a circular argument, if the premises are all true, the conclusion must be true: the conclusion is the same as one of the premises.

durgesh79 wrote:
A valid argument is often defined as one in which it is not possible for all the premises to be true and the conclusion false.

Since the conclusion of a circular argument is the same as one of the premises, if the premises are all true, the conclusion cannot be false. Thus, circular arguments are 'valid arguments', according to the definitions. A.

Hi,

Shouldn't the above explanation also make option D right. ?
D. Some circular arguments are valid, and some are not.

I think D is wrong due to the expression of "some (CA) are not (valid)". CA is premise = conclusioin. It should be valid since, under CA, if premise is true, conclusion is to be true, if p is not true, then conclusion is not true. Any other thoughts?
Director
Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Posts: 512
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Jun 2008, 10:12
I think the answer should be A.
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Nov 2006
Posts: 277
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Jun 2008, 13:19
I would say D,

Reason:

Premise 1: True

Premise 2 True

Conclusion : True (as conclusion = Premise 1)

Thus Valid Argument

Premise 1: True

Premise 2 : False

Conclusion : True (as conclusion = Premise 1)

Not a valid argument in this case.

hence sometimes valid and sometimes invalid.
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 1180
Followers: 427

Kudos [?]: 1554 [0], given: 4

### Show Tags

29 Jun 2008, 13:39
Ashwin_Mohan wrote:
I would say D,

Reason:

Premise 1: True

Premise 2 True

Conclusion : True (as conclusion = Premise 1)

Thus Valid Argument

Premise 1: True

Premise 2 : False

Conclusion : True (as conclusion = Premise 1)

Not a valid argument in this case.

hence sometimes valid and sometimes invalid.

From the question, "A valid argument is often defined as one in which it is not possible for all the premises to be true and the conclusion false." There is nothing in this definition to suggest that false premises make an argument invalid.
_________________

GMAT Tutor in Toronto

If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

Last edited by IanStewart on 29 Jun 2008, 14:42, edited 1 time in total.
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Nov 2006
Posts: 277
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 36 [3] , given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Jun 2008, 13:57
3
KUDOS
There are only 2 values that the premise and conclusions can take. True and False. Thus the question states that

A valid argument is often defined as one in which it is not possible for all the premises to be true and the conclusion false

from this we can infer that if one of the premises is not true(= false) then the conclusion cannot be true (for a valid argument that is!!)
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 1180
Followers: 427

Kudos [?]: 1554 [1] , given: 4

### Show Tags

29 Jun 2008, 14:39
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
Ashwin_Mohan wrote:
There are only 2 values that the premise and conclusions can take. True and False. Thus the question states that

A valid argument is often defined as one in which it is not possible for all the premises to be true and the conclusion false

from this we can infer that if one of the premises is not true(= false) then the conclusion cannot be true (for a valid argument that is!!)

That is not a valid inference. While the question doesn't say that there are only two values the premise and conclusion can take, it doesn't make a difference if we assume this to be the case. An argument is valid if:

If the premises are true, the conclusion is true.

The lone inference we can make from this is the contrapositive (from "If A then B" you can always conclude "If not B then not A"). That is, we can conclude:

If the conclusion is false, the premises are false (well, at least one of them is).

The inference you have made, "If the premises are false, the conclusion is false", is called the 'inverse'. That is, you've translated "If A then B" into "If not A then not B". This is not a legitimate inference to draw, as I will illustrate with an example. Suppose I'm standing next to a swimming pool, and have no shelter nearby. Then the following may be true:

"If it rains, I get wet."

We can certainly deduce the contrapositive:

"If I'm not wet, it's not raining."

We cannot conclude the inverse:

"If it's not raining, I'm not wet". I might be in the swimming pool.

Equivalently, we cannot deduce the converse (I say equivalently, because the converse is the contrapositive of the inverse- they're logically the same):

"If I'm wet, it's raining." Again, I might be swimming.
_________________

GMAT Tutor in Toronto

If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Nov 2006
Posts: 277
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Jun 2008, 16:46

Here's how a circular argument would look like

Premise 1 : The woman says she is not mad
Premise 2 : Whatever the woman says is true
Conclusion : The woman is not mad. (= premise 1)

more like A-->B-->C-->A

Anyone who rejects the argument’s conclusion should also reject at least one of its premises (the one that is the same as its conclusion), and so should reject the argument as a whole.

Anyone who accepts all of the argument’s premises already accepts the argument’s conclusion, so can’t be said to have been persuaded by the argument. In neither case, then, will the argument be successful.
Director
Joined: 27 May 2008
Posts: 544
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 327 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Jun 2008, 22:12
Good discussion Guys, the OA is A. Below is the OE, which i dint understand.

"(A) Some people find this paradoxical, but it follows directly that circular arguments are valid. If the premises are true, and the conclusion is one if the premises, it must be true. Another trick here is the word 'valid'. Just because an argument is valid, does not mean it is true. Many people will make that false assumption and be thrown off on this question."
Intern
Joined: 05 Jul 2010
Posts: 27
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 7

### Show Tags

21 Jul 2010, 10:04
Nice one!
_________________

If you like my posts please consider giving me KUDOS!!!!!!!!!

Thanks:)

SVP
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1549
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 609 [0], given: 6

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2010, 15:47
took long time to understand this. But agree with A.

Valid argument --> Often, all premises cannot be true, conclusion cannot be false
Circular argument --> sometimes, premise = conclusion

(A) Every circular argument is valid as long as its premises are true.

If premises are true --> conclusion is true (Circular argument) --> and conclusion cannot be false in valid argument --> In this case, conclusion is true and hence circular argument is valid as long as its premises are true.
Manager
Status: Bouncing back from failure
Joined: 08 Mar 2010
Posts: 109
Schools: Wharton,MIT, Tepper, Kelly,
WE 1: 7 years- Service Managament, poject Management, Business Consultant- Retail
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 34

### Show Tags

26 Jul 2010, 06:59
D
Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2010
Posts: 111
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 9

### Show Tags

26 Jul 2010, 08:26
+1 for A. But a good challenging CR Thanks durgesh79
Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Sep 2009
Posts: 361
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 463 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

25 Jul 2011, 07:10
Thank you seekmba for your explanation.
Manager
Status: GMAT BATTLE - WIN OR DIE
Joined: 02 May 2011
Posts: 173
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GMAT Date: 12-22-2011
GPA: 3.81
WE: General Management (Hospitality and Tourism)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 13

### Show Tags

25 Jul 2011, 07:15
+1 for A
Manager
Joined: 11 Feb 2011
Posts: 78
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

25 Jul 2011, 17:12
yes..ans is A
Re: CR Circular Argument   [#permalink] 25 Jul 2011, 17:12

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 38 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
The argument is based on which assumption 0 19 Jun 2016, 03:03
1 CR- which weakens the argument 5 14 Aug 2015, 08:45
A valid argument is often defined as one in which it is not 4 28 Jul 2010, 23:24
A valid argument is often defined as one in which it is not 12 02 Dec 2008, 01:07
A valid argument is often defined as one in which it is not 4 19 Nov 2007, 17:24
Display posts from previous: Sort by