OFFICIAL EXPLANATIONProject SC Butler: Sentence Correction (SC2)
THE PROMPTQuote:
According to a new study claiming that only children from wealthy households can become successful athletes is, ultimately, a misunderstanding of the aptitudes that athletes really require. • Meaning?
The sentence is not suggesting that a new study is claiming something.
Rather, the sentence is suggesting something about that claim itself, namely, that the claim is a misunderstanding of something.
THE OPTIONSQuote:
A) According to a new study claiming that only children from wealthy households can become successful athletes [SUBJECT?]
is, ultimately, a misunderstanding of the aptitudes that athletes really require.
• A case of the missing subject/nonsensical
→ No subject exists for the verb
is. The sentence is incoherent.
ELIMINATE A
Quote:
B) According to a new study that claims that only children from wealthy households can become successful athletes
is, ultimately, a misunderstanding of the aptitudes that athletes really require.
• same problem as that in option A: a subject is missing and we are left with an incoherent sentence
ELIMINATE B
Quote:
C) The claim that only children from wealthy households can become successful athletes is, ultimately, a misunderstanding of the aptitudes that athletes really require, according to a new study.
• grammatical, but stylistically clunky
→ English is an "end-weighted" language, as I have discussed. Whatever comes last gets the emphasis.
But the study is not the emphasis of this sentence; the dicey claim is the centerpiece.
→ Why do we wait so long to find out about . . . the backdrop? (The study.)
→ "According to a new study" placed in front would be a good way to "set the stage" for this sentence.
[Sidebar: these were my thoughts about option C before I read option E.]
KEEP, but look for a better answer
Quote:
D)
That only children from wealthy households can become successful athletes is, according to a new study, a claim
that, ultimately, is a misunderstanding of the aptitudes
that are required by athletes.
• Grammatical, but convoluted
→ too many "that" words (writers and editors avoid too many of them, a phenomenon that you'll see if you read
The Economist, New Yorker, or
Atlantic Monthly)
→ the construction of this sentence is extremely—almost distractingly—passive
KEEP, but look for a better answer
Quote:
E) According to a new study, the claim that only children from wealthy households can become successful athletes is, ultimately, a misunderstanding of the aptitudes that athletes really require.
• If you are reading enough, you should be able to see within 10 seconds that option E is better than options C and D.
→ Option E beats option D
Option E is more concise, less convoluted, and easier to follow than option D is.
→ Option E beats option C
It's true that option C is grammatical.
It is also true that a singular "grammatical" orientation or a hyperfocus on rules will not help you with these kinds of splits.
Option E end weights the important information (that the elitist claim is flawed) and by placing "according to a new study" at the beginning of the sentence eases us into the subject.
ELIMINATE options C and D, KEEP
The best answer is E.zhanbo , I hope that analysis helps to answer your question.
You also asked:
Is there an official GMAT question that tests the placement of "according to a new study"?Answer: I recall a handful of questions that deploy the phrase, but I cannot recall an official question that tests placement of the phrase.
I will not rule out the possibility.
My memory is good, not perfect.
In all sincerity (because I am a bit agape): is what you asked your standard for whether a question should be posted?
If people have questions that could be part of SC Butler, by all means, send them to me.
You can be a guest poster. You get kudos. I'll write the OE if you don't have one.
I outline the process
in this post, here.
COMMENTSI am encouraged by your hard work.
The analysis here is fairly sophisticated and occasionally brave. Nicely done.
Kudos go to those who explained the process of elimination for each option.