Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 02:35 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 02:35
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
atalpanditgmat
Joined: 02 Oct 2012
Last visit: 15 Nov 2013
Posts: 69
Own Kudos:
691
 [42]
Given Kudos: 23
Status:Working hard to score better on GMAT
Location: Nepal
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.83
WE:Accounting (Consulting)
Posts: 69
Kudos: 691
 [42]
8
Kudos
Add Kudos
34
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,264
Own Kudos:
42,418
 [48]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,264
Kudos: 42,418
 [48]
33
Kudos
Add Kudos
15
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Zarrolou
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Last visit: 11 Dec 2013
Posts: 846
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 219
Status:Far, far away!
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
Posts: 846
Kudos: 5,145
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
aditya8062
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 Sep 2010
Last visit: 26 Nov 2020
Posts: 503
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 61
Posts: 503
Kudos: 668
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
Why B is wrong? "Is it The surface temperature in ......." is repeated in the second clause or anything else beyond by observation?

i am not sure why u have said this
B looks perfect to me . comparison wise and parallelism wise

u need "over" and not "previous"
User avatar
carcass
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,754
Own Kudos:
37,014
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4,856
Posts: 4,754
Kudos: 37,014
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
OA is B

before to post a question you have to be sure about the OA, otherwise is quite detrimental.

regards
User avatar
atalpanditgmat
Joined: 02 Oct 2012
Last visit: 15 Nov 2013
Posts: 69
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 23
Status:Working hard to score better on GMAT
Location: Nepal
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.83
WE:Accounting (Consulting)
Posts: 69
Kudos: 691
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thank you guys. though i thought the answer is B, according to my source it's D. Now I realised my source is unreliable.
User avatar
blueseas
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Last visit: 15 Jan 2019
Posts: 577
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 197
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.6
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
Posts: 577
Kudos: 4,510
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
daagh
I wouldn’t think B is wrong.
Let’s go case by case
(A) the surface temperature in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada has increased in the previous thirty years by about five degrees --- ‘Over the previous’ means that the thirty years do not include the present. Then we cannot justify the use of present perfect ‘has increased ’ wrong

(B) the surface temperature in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada has increased over the last thirty years by about five degrees --- last thirty years means last thirty years including the present. So the use of present perfect ‘has increased ‘ is justified.--- Correct

(C) there was an increase in the last thirty years by about five degrees in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada --- we can’t use past tense, when we say last thirty years. Wrong

(D) it had increased in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada by about five degrees over the previous thirty years ---- had increased denotes it happened before some other past event; There is no such simple past event to justify past perfect – wrong

(E) it has increased in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada over the previous thirty years by about five degrees --- can’t use present perfect ‘has increased’ when we say previous

Take away: use past tense when previous is used, because previous is a closed chapter of a past event. Use present perfect when last is use, because last is a roll-over that includes the present.

hi daagh very nicely explained but one more question,if in answer choice E in place of "PREVIOUS"..."OVER" is present then it will become correct choice means only the presence of "previous" makes it incorrect ?

REGARDS
skm
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,264
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,264
Kudos: 42,418
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi skm
can u please post the your intended clause; becos, after replacing previous with over, the sentence doesn't seem to be makimg much meaning;
User avatar
PiyushK
Joined: 22 Mar 2013
Last visit: 31 Aug 2025
Posts: 598
Own Kudos:
4,978
 [1]
Given Kudos: 235
Status:Everyone is a leader. Just stop listening to others.
Location: India
GPA: 3.51
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Products:
Posts: 598
Kudos: 4,978
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,

According to following link, we can limit the time using in the last one year etc.. and use present perfect tense as well.

https://www.englishpage.com/verbpage/presentperfect.html

Have you been to Mexico in the last year?
I have seen that movie six times in the last month.

Thus, A and B are both grammatically correct, but B wins as B is perfect parallel to preceding clause.
avatar
vietmoi999
Joined: 08 Apr 2013
Last visit: 07 Dec 2014
Posts: 97
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 27
Posts: 97
Kudos: 70
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
after "in" , we use a number of time such as: 2 years, 3 years and it shows the future
"over" should go with a period.

"it" refers to the same thing at the previous phrase. "it" in D and E means "the suface temperature of the global" and so makes no sense.

this question tests a preposition, testing a purely grammaticaly point and so is typical of gmat sc, which normally test logic/meaning relation between entities.
User avatar
TooLong150
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Last visit: 07 Feb 2022
Posts: 135
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,412
GMAT 1: 620 Q44 V31
GMAT 2: 610 Q47 V28
GMAT 3: 700 Q49 V36
GMAT 4: 690 Q48 V35
GMAT 5: 750 Q49 V42
GMAT 6: 730 Q50 V39
GPA: 3
Products:
GMAT 6: 730 Q50 V39
Posts: 135
Kudos: 536
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Please hide the OP's question to prevent influencing answers.
User avatar
LucyDang
Joined: 24 Mar 2010
Last visit: 22 Jun 2017
Posts: 57
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105
Posts: 57
Kudos: 404
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
daagh
I wouldn’t think B is wrong.
Let’s go case by case
(A) the surface temperature in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada has increased in the previous thirty years by about five degrees --- ‘Over the previous’ means that the thirty years do not include the present. Then we cannot justify the use of present perfect ‘has increased ’ wrong


Hi daagh,

There might be a mistake in your analysis. Choice A doesn't have "over the previous" that you mentioned, but "in the previous". The way I view the problems in choice A is different from yours. Please help to clarify if my understanding is incorrect/correct:

The use of "in" in this sentence is a bit confused. "in" can be understood as in "increase in" which means to become progressively greater (as in size, amount, number, or intensity). Thus, temperature cannot increase in period of time but over period of time.

How do you think?
User avatar
zvazviri
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Last visit: 07 Aug 2025
Posts: 53
Own Kudos:
153
 [1]
Given Kudos: 68
Posts: 53
Kudos: 153
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
According to scientists at the University of Alaska, while the surface temperature of the globe has risen over the last century by about one degree Fahrenheit, the surface temperature in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada has increased in the previous thirty years by about five degrees.

(A) the surface temperature in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada has increased in the previous thirty years by about five degrees not parallel with over the last century

(B) the surface temperature in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada has increased over the last thirty years by about five degrees Correct: 'while the surface temperature....has risen over the last century ,the surface temperature .....has increased over the last thirty

(C) there was an increase in the last thirty years by about five degrees in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada the beginning is not parallel with 'while the surface temperature

(D) it had increased in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada by about five degrees over the previous thirty years the beginning is not parallel with 'while the surface temperature

(E) it has increased in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada over the previous thirty years by about five degrees the beginning is not parallel with 'while the surface temperature.
User avatar
techiesam
Joined: 01 Jun 2015
Last visit: 14 Dec 2019
Posts: 157
Own Kudos:
332
 [1]
Given Kudos: 197
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V26
GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V26
Posts: 157
Kudos: 332
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
daagh
I wouldn’t think B is wrong.
Let’s go case by case
(A) the surface temperature in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada has increased in the previous thirty years by about five degrees --- ‘in the previous’ means that the thirty years do not include the present. Then we cannot justify the use of present perfect ‘has increased ’ wrong

(B) the surface temperature in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada has increased over the last thirty years by about five degrees ---over the last thirty years means last thirty years including the present. So the use of present perfect ‘has increased ‘ is justified.--- Correct

(C) there was an increase in the last thirty years by about five degrees in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada --- we can’t use past tense, when we say last thirty years. Wrong

(D) it had increased in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada by about five degrees over the previous thirty years ---- had increased denotes it happened before some other past event; There is no such simple past event to justify past perfect – wrong

(E) it has increased in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada over the previous thirty years by about five degrees --- can’t use present perfect ‘has increased’ when we say previous

Take away: use past tense when previous is used, because previous is a closed chapter of a past event. Use present perfect when last is use, because last is a roll-over that includes the present.

daagh

Sir,Is the use of "it" in option E right or not??
User avatar
thangvietnam
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Last visit: 09 Mar 2023
Posts: 768
Own Kudos:
418
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,198
Posts: 768
Kudos: 418
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
atalpanditgmat
According to scientists at the University of Alaska, while the surface temperature of the globe has risen over the last century by about one degree Fahrenheit, the surface temperature in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada has increased in the previous thirty years by about five degrees.

(A) the surface temperature in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada has increased in the previous thirty years by about five degrees

(B) the surface temperature in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada has increased over the last thirty years by about five degrees

(C) there was an increase in the last thirty years by about five degrees in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada

(D) it had increased in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada by about five degrees over the previous thirty years

(E) it has increased in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada over the previous thirty years by about five degrees

Why B is wrong? "Is it The surface temperature in ......." is repeated in the second clause or anything else beyond by observation?
Answers with complete explanation will be appreciated.

OA will be given after discussion...
thanks

i0 year" can go with simple past or present perfect because "in last 30 years" can be understood as finished or unfinished.
avatar
zongzong
Joined: 27 Sep 2018
Last visit: 02 Dec 2018
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 1
GMAT 1: 580 Q49 V20
GPA: 3.55
GMAT 1: 580 Q49 V20
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
:dazed Hi,
I have a question.
"the surface temperature in Alaska,Siberia,and Northwestern Canada", doesn't it mean the temperature of all these three places?
if it does, why it is not "the surface temperatures of....."?
I have struggled into this question for a long time.
someone please help me explain it
thank you in advance
User avatar
Manas1212
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Last visit: 10 Aug 2019
Posts: 68
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 474
Location: India
Posts: 68
Kudos: 116
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
According to scientists at the University of Alaska, while the surface temperature of the globe has risen over the last century by about one degree Fahrenheit, the surface temperature in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada has increased in the previous thirty years by about five degrees.

(A) the surface temperature in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada has increased in the previous thirty years by about five degrees
B is better just for the preposition over
(B) the surface temperature in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada has increased over the last thirty years by about five degrees
Over is a better preposition in this context to justify the continuity.
(C) there was an increase in the last thirty years by about five degrees in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada
Kind of saying years increased by 5 degrees..wow
(D) it had increased in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada by about five degrees over the previous thirty years
There is no reason to use Had
Surface temperature is a better noun than It,because "it" may refer to surface temperature of the globe in alaska--

(E) it has increased in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada over the previous thirty years by about five degrees
Surface temperature is a better noun than It,because "it" may refer to surface temperature of the globe in alaska--

Hi AjiteshArun

Could you please add something on to this problem or any faults in my reasoning ?
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Manas1212
According to scientists at the University of Alaska, while the surface temperature of the globe has risen over the last century by about one degree Fahrenheit, the surface temperature in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada has increased in the previous thirty years by about five degrees.

(A) the surface temperature in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada has increased in the previous thirty years by about five degrees
B is better just for the preposition over
(B) the surface temperature in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada has increased over the last thirty years by about five degrees
Over is a better preposition in this context to justify the continuity.
(C) there was an increase in the last thirty years by about five degrees in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada
Kind of saying years increased by 5 degrees..wow
(D) it had increased in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada by about five degrees over the previous thirty years
There is no reason to use Had
Surface temperature is a better noun than It,because "it" may refer to surface temperature of the globe in alaska--

(E) it has increased in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada over the previous thirty years by about five degrees
Surface temperature is a better noun than It,because "it" may refer to surface temperature of the globe in alaska--

Hi AjiteshArun

Could you please add something on to this problem or any faults in my reasoning ?
Your analysis looks good.

I agree that over is better than in. Also, we can remove option C as it doesn't tell us what the increase was in and because "there was an increase" is not as direct as what the correct option uses.

Over the last 30 years sounds a little better than over the previous 30 years, but maybe that is just because I am not very familiar with something like "previous 30 years".
avatar
njnikhiljindal567
Joined: 08 Apr 2019
Last visit: 29 Aug 2020
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 104
Posts: 6
Kudos: 13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
daagh
I wouldn’t think B is wrong.
Let’s go case by case
(A) the surface temperature in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada has increased in the previous thirty years by about five degrees --- ‘in the previous’ means that the thirty years do not include the present. Then we cannot justify the use of present perfect ‘has increased ’ wrong

(B) the surface temperature in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada has increased over the last thirty years by about five degrees ---over the last thirty years means last thirty years including the present. So the use of present perfect ‘has increased ‘ is justified.--- Correct

(C) there was an increase in the last thirty years by about five degrees in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada --- we can’t use past tense, when we say last thirty years. Wrong

(D) it had increased in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada by about five degrees over the previous thirty years ---- had increased denotes it happened before some other past event; There is no such simple past event to justify past perfect – wrong

(E) it has increased in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada over the previous thirty years by about five degrees --- can’t use present perfect ‘has increased’ when we say previous

Take away: use past tense when previous is used, because previous is a closed chapter of a past event. Use present perfect when last is use, because last is a roll-over that includes the present.

Hello,

Is the usage of "It" in C/D/E correct?
avatar
tedwang
Joined: 28 Mar 2020
Last visit: 29 Nov 2023
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
15
 [1]
Given Kudos: 17
Location: Hong Kong
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V41
GPA: 3.6
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V41
Posts: 15
Kudos: 15
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I would like to point out some ambiguity in the explanation of A.

It is totally fine, if you simply say "X has increased ... in the previous 30 years.". And no one would take it as excluding present.

The actual problem exists because of "over the last century" in the first clause. When you use "previous" in the second clause, it becomes unclear which period you are referring to.
(1) the last thirty years. (same to the meaning of this sentence)
(2) the thirty years prior to the last century, which is 130 years ago to 100 years ago. (most likely people will take this meaning)

"While..., ..." expresses a comparison. It will not make whole much of sense if you take the (2).

daagh
I wouldn’t think B is wrong.
Let’s go case by case
(A) the surface temperature in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada has increased in the previous thirty years by about five degrees --- ‘in the previous’ means that the thirty years do not include the present. Then we cannot justify the use of present perfect ‘has increased ’ wrong

(B) the surface temperature in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada has increased over the last thirty years by about five degrees ---over the last thirty years means last thirty years including the present. So the use of present perfect ‘has increased ‘ is justified.--- Correct

(C) there was an increase in the last thirty years by about five degrees in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada --- we can’t use past tense, when we say last thirty years. Wrong

(D) it had increased in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada by about five degrees over the previous thirty years ---- had increased denotes it happened before some other past event; There is no such simple past event to justify past perfect – wrong

(E) it has increased in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada over the previous thirty years by about five degrees --- can’t use present perfect ‘has increased’ when we say previous

Take away: use past tense when previous is used, because previous is a closed chapter of a past event. Use present perfect when last is use, because last is a roll-over that includes the present.
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts