Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Each admissions season, many candidates receive a response from MBA admissions committees that can sometimes be far more frustrating than a rejection: “You have been placed on our waitlist.” What should you do when your status is uncertain?
...In this webinar, Veritas Prep instructor Hailey Cusimano addresses how recognizing and overcoming "Mental Intertia" on GMAT Critical Reasoning January 29th
Are you struggling to achieve your target GMAT score? Most students struggle to cross GMAT 700 because they lack a strategic plan of action. Attend this Free Strategy Webinar, which will empower you to create a well-defined study plan to score 760+
Which MBA program is right for me? How can I find the best fit? An experienced senior consultant from our partner MBA admissions consulting firm, mbaMission, will help prospective MBAs understand the differences that exist among top MBA programs.
After decreasing steadily in the mid-1990's, the percentage of student
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 23 Mar 2019, 00:29
2
7
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
15% (low)
Question Stats:
76% (01:29) correct 24% (01:47) wrong based on 525 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
After decreasing steadily in the mid-1990's, the percentage of students in the United States finishing high school or having earned equivalency diplomas increased in the last three years of the decade, up to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and 84.8 percent in 1998.
(A) finishing high school or having earned equivalency diplomas increased in the last three years of the decade, up to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and
(B) finishing high school or earning equivalency diplomas, increasing in the last three years of the decade, rising to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and from
(C) having finished high school or earning an equivalency diploma increased in the last three years of the decade, and rose to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and from
(D) who either finished high school or they earned an equivalency diploma, increasing in the last three years of the decade, rose to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and
(E) who finished high school or earned equivalency diplomas increased in the last three years of the decade, to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and
After sliding in the mid-1990's, the percentage of students who finished high school or earned equivalency diplomas has inched up in the last three years, to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and 84.8 percent in 1998. The highest previous rate was 86.4 percent in 1992.
Re: After decreasing steadily in the mid-1990's, the percentage of student
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Aug 2013, 07:43
3
2
Hi Zarrolou,
After decreasing steadily in the mid-1990's, the percentage of students in the United States finishing high school or having earned equivalency diplomas increased in the last three years of the decade, up to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and 84.8 percent in 1998.
(A) finishing high school or having earned equivalency diplomas increased in the last three years of the decade, up to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and (B) finishing high school or earning equivalency diplomas, increasing in the last three years of the decade, rising to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and from (C) having finished high school or earning an equivalency diploma increased in the last three years of the decade, and rose to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and from (D) who either finished high school or they earned an equivalency diploma, increasing in the last three years of the decade, rose to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and (E) who finished high school or earned equivalency diplomas increased in the last three years of the decade, to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and
The reason that verb-ing modifiers in Choices A, B, and C refer to immediately preceding noun United States and hence these choices should be eliminated is not correct.
The verb-ing modifier without a comma preceding it and a relative pronoun both are noun modifiers. The rules for all the noun modifiers are the same. In that case, then “who” in Choices D and E should also refer to the immediate preceding noun United States. But that is not the case.
In choices A, B , and C, the verb-ing modifiers correctly refers to the preceding noun phrase “students in the United States”. This is the reason why “who” also refers to this very noun phrase in choices D and E.
For more details on when a noun modifier can refer to a slightly far away noun and when it cannot, please refer to the following article:
Re: After decreasing steadily in the mid-1990's, the percentage of student
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Apr 2013, 07:25
1
After decreasing steadily in the mid-1990's, the percentage of students in the United States finishing high school or having earned equivalency diplomas increased in the last three years of the decade, up to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and 84.8 percent in 1998.
(A) finishing high school or having earned equivalency diplomas increased in the last three years of the decade, up to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and (B) finishing high school or earning equivalency diplomas, increasing in the last three years of the decade, rising to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and from (C) having finished high school or earning an equivalency diploma increased in the last three years of the decade, and rose to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and from (D) who either finished high school or they earned an equivalency diploma, increasing in the last three years of the decade, rose to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and (E) who finished high school or earned equivalency diplomas increased in the last three years of the decade, to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and
I confirm: the OA is E. (well said aditya8062 ) The use of the -ing form modifies the noun before, Unites States in this case. This is clearly wrong: out A B C. D is unclear: "they" makes the sentence redundant.
Re: After decreasing steadily in the mid-1990's, the percentage of student
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Aug 2013, 20:22
1
Please note that when "who" is used as a non-essential modifier, ie. with a comma right before "who", then "who" modifies the noun right before the comma. Else, when "who" is used as anessential modifier, ie. without a comma right before "who", then "who" doesn't necessarily modify the noun right before the comma. So, in this case, "who" modifies "students in the United States".
Re: After decreasing steadily in the mid-1990's, the percentage of student
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Aug 2013, 02:22
Here are my colorful 2 cents on the answer choices.
aditya8062 wrote:
After decreasing steadily in the mid-1990's, the percentage of students in the United States finishing high school or having earned equivalency diplomas increased in the last three years of the decade, up to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and 84.8 percent in 1998. (A) finishing high school or having earned equivalency diplomas increased in the last three years of the decade, up to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and - Unidiomatic; increased ... upto is just wrong (B) finishing high school or earning equivalency diplomas, increasing in the last three years of the decade, rising to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and from - intended meaning unclear because of incorrect modifiers (C) having finished high school or earning an equivalency diploma increased in the last three years of the decade, and rose to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and from -Fragmented sentence structure (D) who either finished high school or they earned an equivalency diploma, increasing in the last three years of the decade, rose to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and - Incorrect parallelism; redundant wordings-increase already captures the essence of %tage increasing (E) who finished high school or earned equivalency diplomas increased in the last three years of the decade, to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and Correct answer choice
Re: After decreasing steadily in the mid-1990's, the percentage of student
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Aug 2013, 07:04
mohish wrote:
egmat wrote:
“who” in Choices D and E should also refer to the immediate preceding noun United States.
Hello egmat, how can who modify United States? Can who modify a country?
Hi "mohish",
Well, that's what my point is. The way cannot refer to United States, in the same way the other noun modifiers after "United States" also do not refer to the Unites States because logically they all refer to a little far away noun "students".
Re: After decreasing steadily in the mid-1990's, the percentage of student
[#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Aug 2013, 03:06
In Choice E isn't comma between decade & 86.5 wrong?
"who finished high school or earned equivalency diplomas increased in the last three years of the decade, to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and"
Re: After decreasing steadily in the mid-1990's, the percentage of student
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Jun 2016, 10:40
The phrase needs a "who" because saying "someone having done something" is not idiomatic. Answer choice D has "they", rendering the answer choice incorrect. Answer choice E is the correct one.
_________________
Stuck in the 600's and want to score 700+ on the GMAT? If this describes you, we should talk. I specialize in getting motivated students into the 700's.
$90/hour as of August 2019. I am not accepting any more students for the Fall 2019 application cycle, but if you are planning to apply in 2020, feel free to reach out!
Re: After decreasing steadily in the mid-1990's, the percentage of student
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 May 2018, 04:31
egmat wrote:
mohish wrote:
egmat wrote:
“who” in Choices D and E should also refer to the immediate preceding noun United States.
Hello egmat, how can who modify United States? Can who modify a country?
Hi "mohish",
Well, that's what my point is. The way cannot refer to United States, in the same way the other noun modifiers after "United States" also do not refer to the Unites States because logically they all refer to a little far away noun "students".
Though now I know why we cant eliminate A, B, C outright due to the noun modifier rules just explained, I am having trouble to find out on what grounds exactly we eliminated A,B,C .
Is it due to - A - increased..up to = ''up'' being incorrect/redundant B - no verb hence its a sentence fragment C - increased.. and rose to = ''rose'' being incorrect/redundant ; Also, , and is not required because the intention is to use this part as a modifier rather than as an independent clause and there is no Independent clause following it
Re: After decreasing steadily in the mid-1990's, the percentage of student
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Dec 2019, 13:30
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!
Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).
Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
gmatclubot
Re: After decreasing steadily in the mid-1990's, the percentage of student
[#permalink]
14 Dec 2019, 13:30
close
76% (01:29) correct 
