Last visit was: 14 Jun 2025, 10:35 It is currently 14 Jun 2025, 10:35
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 14 June 2025
Posts: 102,016
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 93,853
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 102,016
Kudos: 732,261
 [19]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
17
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
vaibhav1221
Joined: 19 Nov 2017
Last visit: 16 Feb 2024
Posts: 296
Own Kudos:
371
 [3]
Given Kudos: 50
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.25
WE:Account Management (Advertising and PR)
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
rahulkashyap
Joined: 09 Oct 2015
Last visit: 24 Feb 2019
Posts: 171
Own Kudos:
72
 [1]
Given Kudos: 28
Posts: 171
Kudos: 72
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
vaibhav1221
Joined: 19 Nov 2017
Last visit: 16 Feb 2024
Posts: 296
Own Kudos:
371
 [1]
Given Kudos: 50
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.25
WE:Account Management (Advertising and PR)
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rahulkashyap
is the ans A? it says insignificant ones will not be saved and hence destroyed

I believe that the last line says that the technique which is being developed will be applied on NEW books with historical significance.
Talking about historical significance, it is, i guess, only limited to the new books. I feel A is incorrect.
Waiting for OA.

Regards,
V
avatar
rahulkashyap
Joined: 09 Oct 2015
Last visit: 24 Feb 2019
Posts: 171
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 28
Posts: 171
Kudos: 72
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
vaibhav1221
rahulkashyap
is the ans A? it says insignificant ones will not be saved and hence destroyed

I believe that the last line says that the technique which is being developed will be applied on NEW books with historical significance.
Talking about historical significance, it is, i guess, only limited to the new books. I feel A is incorrect.
Waiting for OA.

Regards,
V
I don't see where it says its applied only on NEW books. Can you highlight the same?

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
vaibhav1221
Joined: 19 Nov 2017
Last visit: 16 Feb 2024
Posts: 296
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 50
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.25
WE:Account Management (Advertising and PR)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rahulkashyap
vaibhav1221
rahulkashyap
is the ans A? it says insignificant ones will not be saved and hence destroyed

I believe that the last line says that the technique which is being developed will be applied on NEW books with historical significance.
Talking about historical significance, it is, i guess, only limited to the new books. I feel A is incorrect.
Waiting for OA.

Regards,
V
I don't see where it says its applied only on NEW books. Can you highlight the same?

Posted from my mobile device

The last line.
I think i was wrong, just realized.
avatar
praveenkuragodi
Joined: 27 Feb 2018
Last visit: 29 Jun 2022
Posts: 26
Own Kudos:
11
 [3]
Given Kudos: 60
Location: India
WE:Engineering (Real Estate)
Posts: 26
Kudos: 11
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Almost all of the books published in the past 150 years were printed on acidic paper. Unfortunately, every kind of acidic paper gradually destroys itself due to its very acidity. This process of deterioration can be slowed if the books are stored in a cool, dry environment. Techniques, which are now being developed, to deacidify books will probably be applied only to books with historical significance.

If all of the statements in the passage above are true, which one of the following must also be true?


(A) If a book was published in the past 150 years and is historically insignificant, it will probably deteriorate completely.

(B) Almost all of the books published in the past 150 years will gradually destroy themselves.

(C) Almost all of the books that gradually deteriorate are made of acidic paper.

(D) If a book is of historical significance and was printed before 150 years ago, it will be deacidified.

(E) Books published on acidic paper in 1900 should now all be at about the same state of deterioration.

Lets go Option wise:
(A) If a book was published in the past 150 years and is historically insignificant, it will probably deteriorate completely. Correct - As the last line states only books with significance will be saved i.e. insignificant books get destroyed

(B) Almost all of the books published in the past 150 years will gradually destroy themselves. Already stated in paragraph

(C) Almost all of the books that gradually deteriorate are made of acidic paper. Not necessary to be true, non acidic paper will also degrade

(D) If a book is of historical significance and was printed before 150 years ago, it will be deacidified. Already stated in paragraph, also irrelevant

(E) Books published on acidic paper in 1900 should now all be at about the same state of deterioration. Irrelevant
avatar
prashant6923
Joined: 21 Jul 2012
Last visit: 04 Feb 2019
Posts: 69
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 52
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
Posts: 69
Kudos: 92
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Why OA is A and not B?Passage says the process of deterioration can be slowed. OA should be B.Kindly explain.
User avatar
nightblade354
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Last visit: 14 Jun 2025
Posts: 1,781
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3,290
Status:He came. He saw. He conquered. -- Going to Business School -- Corruptus in Extremis
Location: United States (MA)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,781
Kudos: 6,538
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Further explanations here, should you find that you want some more: https://gmatclub.com/forum/almost-all-o ... 62691.html
User avatar
AdityaHongunti
Joined: 20 Sep 2016
Last visit: 31 Mar 2021
Posts: 552
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 632
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
GPA: 3.6
WE:Operations (Consumer Packaged Goods)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I disagree.
The stem says ALMOST ALL. ie NOT ALL.
Option A says if its not significant it will probably deteriorate completely. Though there is probability mentioned The probabilty isalmost negligible.

option C is also not entirely right.

I would like to know the source of the question. NOT AN OFFICIAL that's for sure.
User avatar
IN2MBB2PE
Joined: 20 Aug 2020
Last visit: 17 Feb 2024
Posts: 131
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 82
Posts: 131
Kudos: 34
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AdityaHongunti
I disagree.
The stem says ALMOST ALL. ie NOT ALL.
Option A says if its not significant it will probably deteriorate completely. Though there is probability mentioned The probabilty isalmost negligible.

option C is also not entirely right.

I would like to know the source of the question. NOT AN OFFICIAL that's for sure.


This is an official LSAT Question and the Answer is A.
User avatar
0ExtraTerrestrial
Joined: 04 Jul 2023
Last visit: 21 May 2025
Posts: 63
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 63
Kudos: 67
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
vaibhav1221
B for me.
Re reading the first two lines makes it clear that B is correct. Almost all of the books published in the past 150 years were printed on acidic paper. Unfortunately, every kind of acidic paper gradually destroys itself.

Well but they might be deacidified before they’re able to destroy themselves

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
bringrice
Joined: 19 Sep 2022
Last visit: 13 Jun 2025
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 66
Location: India
Posts: 6
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi, can anyone help me understand why A is the correct option?

Option A could be correct using conditional reasoning. If a book was published in the last 150 years, it is probable that it was printed on acidic paper. If a book is deacified, then the book was of historical significance. Contra positive of this statement: if the book was not historically significant, then it will not be deacified and will destroy itself. Option A says it is "probable" and thus it is correct in that sense.

Option A could be incorrect as well and here's why. Say a total of 100 books were published in the last 150 years. 95 of those books were published on acidic paper and rest were published on another kind of paper. Further, let's say the same 95 books were of historical significance and the rest 5 were insignificant. This makes Option A wrong because now the "probability" is low that the insignificant books will destroy themselves.
User avatar
TheVDR
Joined: 09 Jun 2023
Last visit: 28 Mar 2025
Posts: 254
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 20
Location: India
Posts: 254
Kudos: 211
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
Option A could be incorrect as well and here's why. Say a total of 100 books were published in the last 150 years. 95 of those books were published on acidic paper and rest were published on another kind of paper. Further, let's say the same 95 books were of historical significance and the rest 5 were insignificant. This makes Option A wrong because now the "probability" is low that the insignificant books will destroy themselves.
The possibility that the number of pH Neutral / Alkaline / Non-acidic paper based "historically insignificant" books will seriously outnumber the acidic paper based "historically insignificant" books is zero as it has already been stated that "almost all of the books published in the past 150 years were printed on acidic paper"
User avatar
bringrice
Joined: 19 Sep 2022
Last visit: 13 Jun 2025
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 66
Location: India
Posts: 6
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
TheVDR
Quote:
Option A could be incorrect as well and here's why. Say a total of 100 books were published in the last 150 years. 95 of those books were published on acidic paper and rest were published on another kind of paper. Further, let's say the same 95 books were of historical significance and the rest 5 were insignificant. This makes Option A wrong because now the "probability" is low that the insignificant books will destroy themselves.
The possibility that the number of pH Neutral / Alkaline / Non-acidic paper based "historically insignificant" books will seriously outnumber the acidic paper based "historically insignificant" books is zero as it has already been stated that "almost all of the books published in the past 150 years were printed on acidic paper"
­The argument does state that "almost all books published in the last 150 years were printed on acidic paper" but it does not distinguish between historically significant vs insignificant books. Based on the argument alone I do believe a possibility such as the example I drew up exists.
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 10 Jun 2025
Posts: 2,924
Own Kudos:
8,336
 [1]
Given Kudos: 57
GMAT 2: 780  Q50  V50
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 2,924
Kudos: 8,336
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bringrice
TheVDR
Quote:
Option A could be incorrect as well and here's why. Say a total of 100 books were published in the last 150 years. 95 of those books were published on acidic paper and rest were published on another kind of paper. Further, let's say the same 95 books were of historical significance and the rest 5 were insignificant. This makes Option A wrong because now the "probability" is low that the insignificant books will destroy themselves.
The possibility that the number of pH Neutral / Alkaline / Non-acidic paper based "historically insignificant" books will seriously outnumber the acidic paper based "historically insignificant" books is zero as it has already been stated that "almost all of the books published in the past 150 years were printed on acidic paper"
­The argument does state that "almost all books published in the last 150 years were printed on acidic paper" but it does not distinguish between historically significant vs insignificant books. Based on the argument alone I do believe a possibility such as the example I drew up exists.
­Interesting idea, but note that A uses the flexible word "probably." Therefore, it can allow for the unlikely scenario that a) there are few insignificant books and b) somehow all of these insignificant books were printed on special acid-free paper (that also does not deteriorate for any other reason). Sure, in that unlikely scenario, the insignificant books won't degrade. But it's still fair to say that they probably will degrade.
User avatar
TheVDR
Joined: 09 Jun 2023
Last visit: 28 Mar 2025
Posts: 254
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 20
Location: India
Posts: 254
Kudos: 211
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
The argument does state that "almost all books published in the last 150 years were printed on acidic paper" but it does not distinguish between historically significant vs insignificant books. Based on the argument alone I do believe a possibility such as the example I drew up exists.
Considering non-acidic books are few (All minus almost all) in number, it is safe to assume that historically insignificant non-acidic books are even fewer than total. Again, we might now know the proportion of historically significant to historically insignificant books for both acidic and non-acidic papers, Option A cleverly says "probably", and we can surely say that the probability is absolutely high. There can be an outlier case as the one you mentioned but using "probably" leaves that room for outliers!
­
User avatar
ishan1110
Joined: 04 Jun 2024
Last visit: 17 Apr 2025
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
2
 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
Location: India
Posts: 3
Kudos: 2
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
vaibhav1221
B for me.
Re reading the first two lines makes it clear that B is correct. Almost all of the books published in the past 150 years were printed on acidic paper. Unfortunately, every kind of acidic paper gradually destroys itself.
­B will be wrong as according to the last statement, books of historical significance will be deacidified and preserved from destroying themsleves
User avatar
Johny23
Joined: 11 Nov 2024
Last visit: 26 Feb 2025
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 29
Posts: 6
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This is, by far, the best explanation of why A is correct. )
ishan1110
vaibhav1221
B for me.
Re reading the first two lines makes it clear that B is correct. Almost all of the books published in the past 150 years were printed on acidic paper. Unfortunately, every kind of acidic paper gradually destroys itself.
­B will be wrong as according to the last statement, books of historical significance will be deacidified and preserved from destroying themsleves
User avatar
JLambert
Joined: 28 May 2025
Last visit: 11 Jun 2025
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 21
Posts: 9
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think the reason it's 'A' is because there's no discussion on how many books are historically significant. We can infer an amount and that most won't meet the criteria, but that's an added step of inference.

'A' doesn't require that. If we are reserving the protection for books that are historically significant, then the ones that aren't won't be protected. It's mainly restating the idea that's written without us having to add context to it.
vaibhav1221
B for me.
Re reading the first two lines makes it clear that B is correct. Almost all of the books published in the past 150 years were printed on acidic paper. Unfortunately, every kind of acidic paper gradually destroys itself.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7325 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts