Found this article incredibly helpful and decided to catch the next alternate cause beauty i found. Lo and behold for all you CR-soon-to-be-champs. This is an official GMAT prep question that I found quite interesting. The question itself is quite straightforward, but I thought that I'd add it to this thread to help everyone strengthen this concept. Thanks
e-gmat. Great tip!
In the late 1980’s, the population of sea otters in the North Pacific Ocean began to
decline. Of the two plausible explanations for the decline—increased predation by killer
whales or disease—disease is the more likely. After all, a concurrent sharp decline in
the populations of seals and sea lions was almost certainly caused by a pollutionrelated
disease, which could have spread to sea otters, whereas the population of killer
whales did not change noticeably
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the reasoning?
A. Killer whales in the North Pacific usually prey on seals and sea lions but will,
when this food source is scarce, seek out other prey.
B. There is no indication that substantial numbers of sea otters migrated to other
locations from the North Pacific in the 1980’s.
C. Along the Pacific coast of North America in the 1980’s, sea otters were absent
from many locations where they had been relatively common in former times.
D. Following the decline in the population of the sea otters, there was an increase
in the population of sea urchins, which are sea otters’ main food source.
E. The North Pacific populations of seals and sea lions cover a wider geographic
area than does the population of sea otters
As usual, please provide reasoning for why each option is correct / incorrect.
Cheers!