Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 19:07 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 19:07
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
   1   2 
555-605 Level|   Comparisons|   Meaning/Logical Predication|   Modifiers|                     
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,108
Own Kudos:
32,887
Given Kudos: 700
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,108
Kudos: 32,887
Although a number of excellent studies narrate the development of dome 31 Mar 2021, 15:34
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ishikasoni111
Hi egmat

Here is my analysis for the question:

Although a number of excellent studies narrate the development of domestic technology and its impact on housewifery, these works do not discuss the contributions of the women employed by manufacturers and utility companies as product demonstrators and publicists, who initially promoted new and unfamiliar technology to female consumers.
A. by manufacturers and utility companies as product demonstrators and publicists,
B. to be product demonstrators and publicists by manufacturers and utility companies,
C. to demonstrate and publicize their products by manufacturers and utility companies
D. by manufacturers and utility companies to be demonstrators and publicists of their products
E. by manufacturers and utility companies to demonstrate and publicize their products

Who refers to demonstrators and publicists
A : I see no direct issues
B. is just rearrangement of A but we have moved referrant of who far, without any actual benefit. So clearly A is a better option.
C has no referrant for who --- > incorrect
D. their is ambiguous, but logically it makes sense for their to point to manufacturers.
E like C has no referant for who --- >incorrect

In A and D, A is clearer option.
But I was not able to eliminate D on stronger grounds.
Show more


Hello ishikasoni111,

Thank you for the query. :-)

Per the context of this sentence, "who initially promoted new and unfamiliar technology to female consumers"? The product demonstrators and publicists. So the "who" clause should refer to these noun entities in the sentence. So Choice A is correct.

Choice D also presents this modification. However, we know from the sentence that women were employed in these roles. Hence, the sentence must use the word "as" to present the role of the employed women "the product demonstrators and publicists". Choice D is incorrect for the usage of "to be".


Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
Shraddha
avatar
clover1987
avatar
Joined: 06 Apr 2020
Last visit: 05 May 2022
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
3
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 7
Kudos: 3
Although a number of excellent studies narrate the development of dome 04 Apr 2021, 15:42
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Although a number of excellent studies narrate the development of domestic technology and its impact on housewifery, these works do not discuss the contributions of the women employed by manufacturers and utility companies as product demonstrators and publicists, who initially promoted new and unfamiliar technology to female consumers.

Dosent the bold portion indicate a preposition? Therefore 'who' in the next part of the sentence should refer back to women, regardless of what follows it. So the sentence says 'these works do not discuss the contributions of women EMPLOYED BY MANUFACTURERS'...isnt this a prepositional phrase?

Please could someone correct my logic?
User avatar
mSKR
User avatar
Joined: 14 Aug 2019
Last visit: 10 Mar 2024
Posts: 1,290
Own Kudos:
938
Given Kudos: 381
Location: Hong Kong
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
Schools: IE (A) IIML-IPMX '22 (A) HKUST '22
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GPA: 3.81
Schools: IE (A) IIML-IPMX '22 (A) HKUST '22
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
Posts: 1,290
Kudos: 938
Although a number of excellent studies narrate the development of dome 06 Apr 2021, 02:25
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
clover1987
Although a number of excellent studies narrate the development of domestic technology and its impact on housewifery, these works do not discuss the contributions of the women employed by manufacturers and utility companies as product demonstrators and publicists, who initially promoted new and unfamiliar technology to female consumers.

Dosent the bold portion indicate a preposition? Therefore 'who' in the next part of the sentence should refer back to women, regardless of what follows it. So the sentence says 'these works do not discuss the contributions of women EMPLOYED BY MANUFACTURERS'...isnt this a prepositional phrase?

Please could someone correct my logic?
Show more

Although a number of excellent studies narrate the development of domestic technology and its impact on housewifery, these works do not discuss the contributions of the women employed by manufacturers and utility companies as product demonstrators and publicists, who initially promoted new and unfamiliar technology to female consumers.

preposition phrase starts with of is Ok , but there is no rule that relative pronoun must refer to women . You ask a question why can't it refer to publicists.
key point is: who xx can refer to human whoever comes as near as it is possible in the sentence.

assuming that who xx refer to women is wrong.
User avatar
EducationAisle
User avatar
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
3,579
 [1]
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
 [1]
Although a number of excellent studies narrate the development of dome 06 Apr 2021, 05:17
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
clover1987
Although a number of excellent studies narrate the development of domestic technology and its impact on housewifery, these works do not discuss the contributions of the women employed by manufacturers and utility companies as product demonstrators and publicists, who initially promoted new and unfamiliar technology to female consumers.

Dosent the bold portion indicate a preposition? Therefore 'who' in the next part of the sentence should refer back to women, regardless of what follows it. So the sentence says 'these works do not discuss the contributions of women EMPLOYED BY MANUFACTURERS'...isnt this a prepositional phrase?

Please could someone correct my logic?
Show more
Hi clover1987, couple of points:

i) There is no rule that relative pronouns (who in this case) cannot refer to noun inside a prepositional phrase

ii) The construct employed by manufacturers and utility companies as product demonstrators and publicists is a participial phrase (not a prepositional phrase).
avatar
GK002
avatar
Joined: 03 May 2021
Last visit: 27 Jun 2022
Posts: 29
Own Kudos:
14
Given Kudos: 13
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 29
Kudos: 14
Although a number of excellent studies narrate the development of dome 05 Jul 2021, 14:04
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Two questions please:

1. I chose B, but couldn't "who" technically refer to the manufacturers and utility companies, since those entities are capable of "promoting new and unfamiliar technology". Or does it ALWAYS have to refer to a person / people? I guess in the case of non-persons "that" would work better..

2. In the correct answer A, what is the "who" referring to? Is it "publicists", "demonstrators AND publicists", or "women"?

many thanks
avatar
Jezza
avatar
Joined: 11 Jan 2022
Last visit: 01 Sep 2022
Posts: 27
Own Kudos:
3
Given Kudos: 17
Posts: 27
Kudos: 3
Although a number of excellent studies narrate the development of dome 22 Jun 2022, 20:50
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dear experts,

Sure the "who" modifier itself can elimiate all incorrect choices, but if we read option A closely, it says "...discuss the [contributions] of women(modifier).... as [product demonstrators and publicists], I am sure the subject in this sub-clause is contributions, not women.

What in the world!?? how can contributions be product demonstrators? How is this logical? shouldn't human beings (women) be discussed as demonstrators and publicists?
User avatar
GmatKnightTutor
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 31 Jan 2020
Last visit: 01 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,228
Own Kudos:
1,568
Given Kudos: 18
Posts: 5,228
Kudos: 1,568
Although a number of excellent studies narrate the development of dome 24 Jun 2022, 00:28
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Jezza

The usage of WHO makes it refer to WOMEN or PRODUCT DEMONSTRATORS and PUBLICISTS. THE COMMA helps promote the former subject WOMEN, however, by "creating" a bit of a distance with the latter.

On the GMAT, WHO cannot refer to CONTRIBUTIONS.
User avatar
anbknaga
User avatar
Joined: 27 Aug 2018
Last visit: 12 Jun 2024
Posts: 93
Own Kudos:
84
Given Kudos: 52
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Healthcare
Schools: ISB '21 (D) Great Lakes '21 (WD)
GMAT 1: 650 Q48 V31
WE:Operations (Healthcare/Pharmaceuticals)
Products:
My Reviews
Schools: ISB '21 (D) Great Lakes '21 (WD)
GMAT 1: 650 Q48 V31
Posts: 93
Kudos: 84
Although a number of excellent studies narrate the development of dome 29 Jun 2022, 01:54
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EducationAisle
ADS2021
How do I ascertain 'who' refers back to what? eg. How do I check that 'who' in option A refer backs to 'women' and not 'manufacturers and utility companies'? This will also help me know how the 'who' B does not refer to 'women' or 'oduct demonstrators and publicists'
Hi ADS2021, who can only refer to persons and so, can never refer to manufacturers and utility companies.
Show more

In your book, it says for pronouns -> First check logically what that pronoun should refer to and then see if that reference make sense.

In option D, "who" cannot refer to products, so the next nearest noun is 'demonstrators & publicists' - then wouldn't this also make it a correct answer?
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,020
Own Kudos:
8,564
 [1]
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,020
Kudos: 8,564
 [1]
Although a number of excellent studies narrate the development of dome 30 Jun 2022, 11:36
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
anbknaga

When we use "who," "which," or "that" to create a modifier, proximity matters. Typically these relative pronouns will modify the immediately preceding noun, and in this case the Official Guide cites this placement as the reason to eliminate D. True, there is some leeway to refer back to an earlier noun, and the GMAT does not enforce this "touch rule" uniformly. So what can we do? The safest policy is to tread carefully when trying to apply a modifier to anything other than the preceding noun. Generally, if this is what's intended, we'll know because the question doesn't give us an option to "fix" it. In this case, there's an answer that puts "who" next to "demonstrators and publicists," so we're better off with A.
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,020
Own Kudos:
8,564
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,020
Kudos: 8,564
Although a number of excellent studies narrate the development of dome 30 Jun 2022, 11:38
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I should add that there are other reasons to discard D, as others pointed out. The placement of "their" doesn't make it 100% clear that this refers to the companies and not the workers, and "employed to be" is unidiomatic.
User avatar
StringArgs
User avatar
Joined: 08 Dec 2021
Last visit: 06 Apr 2023
Posts: 53
Own Kudos:
13
Given Kudos: 39
Status:Patience
Location: India
Posts: 53
Kudos: 13
Although a number of excellent studies narrate the development of dome 11 Jul 2022, 07:01
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Although a number of excellent studies narrate the development of domestic technology and its impact on housewifery, these works do not discuss the contributions of the women employed by manufacturers and utility companies as product demonstrators and publicists, who initially promoted new and unfamiliar technology to female consumers.

the women employed 'by the manufacturers' [A,D,E] vs 'to be product demonstrators by manufacturers' [B, C]: If we delay the prepositional phrase 'by the manufactures' a lot of other nouns come in between that cause the question are the women employed by the manufacturers or the demonstrators by the manufacturers. As the modifier by the manufacturer conveys key info about which women it it preferred it stay near it. Unless ADE have seriously big oopsies we'll keep those as on top. COme to B, C only if A, D, E are for sure wrong.

(A) by manufacturers and utility companies as product demonstrators and publicists, - the women employed by manufactures as product (role) publicists, who... That's alright.

(B) to be product demonstrators and publicists by manufacturers and utility companies,

(C) to demonstrate and publicize their products by manufacturers and utility companies

(D) by manufacturers and utility companies to be demonstrators and publicists of their products- This was alright until it says 'of products' because the next word is ,who! Indeed Who are these products that come where they aren't needed. Who is for people.

(E) by manufacturers and utility companies to demonstrate and publicize their products- Again, WHO are these products! and also their products? the women's? or the manufacturer's?
User avatar
EtaCarnia
User avatar
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 22 Aug 2025
Posts: 68
Own Kudos:
41
Given Kudos: 73
Location: India
Schools: Sauder '22 DeGroote "22 Smurfit Alberta University
GPA: 3.5
Schools: Sauder '22 DeGroote "22 Smurfit Alberta University
Posts: 68
Kudos: 41
Although a number of excellent studies narrate the development of dome 19 Jul 2022, 08:22
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi ,

What is the correct idiom according to GMAT

employed as / employed to?

thanks
User avatar
idilbayar
User avatar
Joined: 08 Oct 2022
Last visit: 26 May 2023
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
3
Given Kudos: 15
Location: Turkey
Posts: 15
Kudos: 3
Although a number of excellent studies narrate the development of dome 14 Apr 2023, 03:37
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hey there,
Can someone please explain why "who" refers to "products" in E and D? As we know, "who" can only refer to people, and "employed by manufacturers and utility companies" acts as a modifier for "women." So I thought the only possible antecedent for "who" is "women" in E and "publicists" in D. How can we conclude that "who" in both E and D refers to "products?"
I appreciate any help you can provide.
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,020
Own Kudos:
8,564
 [1]
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,020
Kudos: 8,564
 [1]
Although a number of excellent studies narrate the development of dome 15 Apr 2023, 21:04
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
It's not that "who" should correctly refer to "products," but rather that this is what the placement suggests. The fact that "who" is meant for people is just one more reason to avoid D and E. See my comments above for more detail, but basically, when we see "noun + WHO," the norm is for WHO to modify that noun (or noun phrase). If that isn't the intention (as it isn't here), it's better to avoid that usage for the sake of clarity.
User avatar
ifyouknowyouknow
User avatar
Joined: 08 Sep 2018
Last visit: 07 Jul 2024
Posts: 83
Own Kudos:
57
Given Kudos: 107
Location: India
Concentration: Operations
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
Products:
My Reviews
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
Posts: 83
Kudos: 57
Although a number of excellent studies narrate the development of dome 15 Oct 2023, 07:48
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DmitryFarber
It's not that "who" should correctly refer to "products," but rather that this is what the placement suggests. The fact that "who" is meant for people is just one more reason to avoid D and E. See my comments above for more detail, but basically, when we see "noun + WHO," the norm is for WHO to modify that noun (or noun phrase). If that isn't the intention (as it isn't here), it's better to avoid that usage for the sake of clarity.
Show more


Hey DmitryFarber in option A "who" is referring to product demonstrators and publicists. Since "women" are eemployed as product demonstrators and publicists can we infer that "who" is indirectly referring to women? Is the reasoning correct.

Thanks in advance
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,830
Own Kudos:
986
Posts: 18,830
Kudos: 986
Although a number of excellent studies narrate the development of dome 21 Oct 2024, 08:56
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
miag
189 posts