Last visit was: 20 Nov 2025, 06:24 It is currently 20 Nov 2025, 06:24
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
dvinoth86
Joined: 19 Oct 2011
Last visit: 06 Dec 2015
Posts: 87
Own Kudos:
1,328
 [60]
Given Kudos: 33
Location: India
Posts: 87
Kudos: 1,328
 [60]
13
Kudos
Add Kudos
46
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
ChrisLele
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Nov 2011
Last visit: 27 Jul 2020
Posts: 295
Own Kudos:
4,793
 [12]
Given Kudos: 2
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 295
Kudos: 4,793
 [12]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
macjas
Joined: 09 May 2012
Last visit: 30 Jul 2015
Posts: 308
Own Kudos:
9,993
 [2]
Given Kudos: 100
Affiliations: UWC
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 620 Q42 V33
GMAT 2: 680 Q44 V38
GPA: 3.43
WE:Engineering (Media/Entertainment)
Products:
GMAT 2: 680 Q44 V38
Posts: 308
Kudos: 9,993
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
bschooladmit
Joined: 11 May 2012
Last visit: 30 Mar 2014
Posts: 159
Own Kudos:
106
 [1]
Given Kudos: 239
Status:Juggg..Jugggg Go!
Location: India
GC Meter: A.W.E.S.O.M.E
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GMAT 1: 620 Q46 V30
GMAT 2: 720 Q50 V38
Products:
GMAT 2: 720 Q50 V38
Posts: 159
Kudos: 106
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
C for me as well.

If C is negated:
People suffering from insomnia do typically respond to their lack of sleep by consuming much more caffeine than they would if they did not suffer from insomnia.
Then, the argument falls apart because it implies that, insomnia hence coffee & not coffee hence insomnia.
User avatar
sananoor
Joined: 24 Jun 2012
Last visit: 11 Apr 2022
Posts: 299
Own Kudos:
483
 [1]
Given Kudos: 331
Location: Pakistan
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
GPA: 3.76
Products:
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
C for me as it says that people suffering from Insomnia do not respond to their Insomnia through drinking more coffee or tea...it means that people taking coffee or tea in excess were not those who developed Insomnia Before taking coffee in excess. In other words, this option rule out that Insomnia leads to excess intake of Caffeine.
Argument says: A causes B--->we have to make sure that there isn't another thing causing B or its B that causes A.
Option C rule out the 2nd option that B causing A and making it confirm that A causing B.
Hope its clear
User avatar
ravigupta2912
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 26 May 2019
Last visit: 16 Feb 2025
Posts: 726
Own Kudos:
291
 [1]
Given Kudos: 84
Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q46 V34
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V40
GPA: 2.58
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
Products:
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
C fits in that classic framework of eliminating the possibility that it isn’t actually insomnia which is causing high caffeine consumption. Because if that happens then the conclusion breaks down.

Posted from my mobile device
avatar
hmayank83
Joined: 03 May 2020
Last visit: 18 Dec 2022
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
8
 [1]
Given Kudos: 31
Posts: 13
Kudos: 8
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
As per the argument caffeine consumption causes insomnia.
Cause -> caffeine consumption Effect ->Insomnia
A. Consumption of caffeine from sources other than coffee, tea, and soft drinks is unlikely to cause insomnia.

We are not concerned with the source of caffeine.

B. Caffeine consumption is the only commonly occurring cause of insomnia.

The conclusion does not depend on this statement.We are not concerned with the other commonly occurring cause of insomnia.

C. People suffering from insomnia do not typically respond to their lack of sleep by consuming much more caffeine

than they would if they did not suffer from insomnia.


This defends the argument by making it clear that the cause and effect relationship is not reversed.
Negation technique: People suffering from insomnia respond to their lack of sleep by consuming much more caffeine
This will break the argument by attacking the author's reasoning that the cause effect relationship can be reversed

D. The only evidence available to show whether caffeine causes insomnia is statistical evidence showing correlations

between caffeine consumption and insomnia.

The argument does not depend on the statistical evidence mentioned in the argument. Rather it focuses more on the fact that insomnia(effect) is due to caffeine consumption(cause)

E. Anyone who regularly consumes caffeine in more than moderate quantities will suffer from insomnia.

This statement does not strengthen or defend the reasoning in any way. Hence it can't be the assumption.

Answer: C.
User avatar
SergejK
Joined: 22 Mar 2024
Last visit: 02 May 2025
Posts: 162
Own Kudos:
781
 [1]
Given Kudos: 74
Posts: 162
Kudos: 781
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I answered this correctly through elimination. I am just not sure I 100% understand how the argument is constructed. If we are asked for the assumption of the argument, we are not asked for the underlying assumption of the conclusion, right? Otherwise "statistical evidence shows that it does" would have to be the conclusion. However, doesn't it present facts? Or because it is a counter-position to the claim that caffeine does not cause insomnia and hence provides an interpretation of many studies, therefore IS the conclusion of the argument? In the context of the passage "statistical evidence shows that it does" looks like the conclusion, considering that it is based on the interpretation of the many studies. But isolated, this part of the first sentence looks rather like part of the premise. Is the reason that it takes an opposing position the reason that it can be viewed as what the argument is trying to say?

Or is the actual conclusion missing here and only implied? Similarly to this boldfaced question, we should focus on­ what the argument is about. As here also, like in the boldfaced question, an opposing position is attacked, the conclusion would then be the opposite of the attacked position, correct? This actually makes more sense as "statistical evidence shows that it does" can only function as a support for the conclusion as it presents evidence interpretation and not a conclusion. I think I'm getting there, just would appreciate support with this question.­

PS: I got it now:

There is methodology to those kind of questions. If the weight of counter premises weighs more than the initial position that the argument is clearly opposing, it implies that the argument takes the position of the data rather than of an unsupported position. It becomes clear that the argument seeks to establish that the initial statement is wrong and that there is a clear causality between coffee causing insomnia. The assumption is then that there is no other causal explanation possible. And we are actually not allowed to question the conclusion, saying that it is wrong. However, we are allowed to question the assumption that no other causal explanation is possible. C clearly presents a reversed causality. By negating this causality it presents the underlying assumption. As we are not trying to weaken our argument, it is the correct answer choice.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,833
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,833
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts