Summer is Coming! Join the Game of Timers Competition to Win Epic Prizes. Registration is Open. Game starts Mon July 1st.

It is currently 23 Jul 2019, 07:29

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Although its purpose is laudable, the exclusionary rule, which forbids

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 56366
Although its purpose is laudable, the exclusionary rule, which forbids  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Aug 2018, 05:49
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  85% (hard)

Question Stats:

44% (01:56) correct 56% (02:29) wrong based on 81 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics


Although its purpose is laudable, the exclusionary rule, which forbids a court to consider evidence seized in violation of the defendant’s constitutional rights, has unduly hampered law-enforcement efforts. Even when the rights violation was a minor or purely technical one, turning on a detail of procedure rather than on the abrogation of some fundamental liberty, and even when it has been clear that the police officers were acting in good faith, the evidence obtained has been considered tainted under this rule and may not even by introduced. In consequence, defendants who were undoubtedly guilty have been set free, perhaps to steal, rape, or murder again.

It can be inferred from the passage that the author would most likely endorse which of the following proposals?


(A) Change of the exclusionary rule to admit evidence obtained by police officers acting in good faith

(B) A constitutional amendment curtailing some of the protections traditionally afforded those accused of a crime

(C) A statute limiting the application of the exclusionary rule to cases involving minor criminal offenses

(D) Change of the exclusionary rule to allow any evidence, no matter how obtained, to be introduced in court

(E) A constitutional amendment allowing police officers to obtain vital evidence by any means necessary when in pursuit of a known criminal

_________________
Director
Director
User avatar
G
Joined: 20 Feb 2015
Posts: 790
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Premium Member
Although its purpose is laudable, the exclusionary rule, which forbids  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Aug 2018, 08:44
Bunuel wrote:
Although its purpose is laudable, the exclusionary rule, which forbids a court to consider evidence seized in violation of the defendant’s constitutional rights, has unduly hampered law-enforcement efforts. Even when the rights violation was a minor or purely technical one, turning on a detail of procedure rather than on the abrogation of some fundamental liberty, and even when it has been clear that the police officers were acting in good faith, the evidence obtained has been considered tainted under this rule and may not even by introduced. In consequence, defendants who were undoubtedly guilty have been set free, perhaps to steal, rape, or murder again.

It can be inferred from the passage that the author would most likely endorse which of the following proposals?


(A) Change of the exclusionary rule to admit evidence obtained by police officers acting in good faith

(B) A constitutional amendment curtailing some of the protections traditionally afforded those accused of a crime

(C) A statute limiting the application of the exclusionary rule to cases involving minor criminal offenses

(D) Change of the exclusionary rule to allow any evidence, no matter how obtained, to be introduced in court

(E) A constitutional amendment allowing police officers to obtain vital evidence by any means necessary when in pursuit of a known criminal



Imo-

(A) Change of the exclusionary rule to admit evidence obtained by police officers acting in good faith
---will keep this one for now !!

(B) A constitutional amendment curtailing some of the protections traditionally afforded those accused of a crime
---This is out of scope , we are more concerned with the exclusionary rule than with protection.
--Out

(C) A statute limiting the application of the exclusionary rule to cases involving minor criminal offenses
---Although the author mentions the minor criminal offence , but this is only a subset of the larger cause at hand
---Out

(D) Change of the exclusionary rule to allow any evidence, no matter how obtained, to be introduced in court
---This one is pretty extreme , if we look at the first statement of the argument , the author says Although its purpose is laudable
---Out

(E) A constitutional amendment allowing police officers to obtain vital evidence by any means necessary when in pursuit of a known criminal
---This is pretty close , but again any means necessary seems a bit extreme
---Out

I will go with A !!
GMAT Club Bot
Although its purpose is laudable, the exclusionary rule, which forbids   [#permalink] 21 Aug 2018, 08:44
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Although its purpose is laudable, the exclusionary rule, which forbids

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne