[quote="WinWinMBA"]Any medical test will sometimes fail to detect
a condition when it is present and indicate that there is one when it is not.
(A) a condition when it is present and indicate that there is one
(B) when a condition is present and indicate that there is one
(C) a condition when it is present and indicate that it is present
(D) when a condition is present and indicate its presence
(E) the presence of a condition when it is there and indicate its presence
permit me to post the 3rd time because this is hard problem.
first this is from old og 10th book. so, I think we do not need to study it. we should study a few recent og books.
but we can study this for fun.
if we use "one" , we can not use "it" or "you" to refer to "one". consider
one should learn English if you want to study a good MBA.
this is wrong. there is some questions from og, which prove this is wrong. instead , we should say
one should learn English if ONE want to study a good MBA.
or
you should learn English if you want to study a good MBA.
our problem is similar ( AM I CORRECT?, PLS CONFIRM, no og question prove my this point)
"it" in "when it is not" can not refer to "one" in "there is one".
moreover, "when it is not" can not go with "there is one". they are not parallel. Ellipsis require the same pattern in two part of sentence. we need "one is not" to use "it is not" or "one is not" . (IF MY FIRST POINT IS WRONG, CHOICE A AND B CAN BE ELIMINATED BY THIS ERROR)
we have to say
"there is one when there is not any one.
so, choice a and b commit 2 mistakes.
choice D dose not offer two opposite meanings, and, so, makes no sense.
choice E is inferior. "it" in " it is there" can refer to "condition" but this reference is not clear because "it" can refer to "presence", and so, is inferior to choice C, in which reference is clear.
the second thing is "it is there" is unclear meaning. where is "there".
"it is not" can be parallel to "it is there" . this is fine.
so, choice E is gone.
some persons consider the following correct
One can not succeed at this unless he tries hard
but i do not see og question prove this point. if you see, pls, share with us.
this question contain unclear points and it is from og 10, which is old. so, I think, we should not study it.