It is currently 23 Feb 2018, 14:34

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Archaeologists in Michigan have excavated a Native American camp near

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Status: GMAT Instructor
Joined: 23 Jun 2013
Posts: 178
Location: India
GRE 1: 2280 Q790 V710
GPA: 3.3
WE: Editorial and Writing (Education)
Re: Archaeologists in Michigan have excavated a Native American camp near [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2014, 19:46
1
KUDOS
Dear Ankur,

The conclusion of the argument is that the camp probably dates to no later than 1630. The reason provided is that no European trade goods were found at the site at that time even though the European traders were fairly active then.

If C is true, then whatever goods reached the area via the European traders (who were active 1620 onward) would have been preserved as much as possible. So, if anything, these goods would have been preserved until far beyond 1630. Also, these goods should have shown up during the excavation and subsequent radiocarbon dating -- but they did not. So this option would only weaken the argument.

_________________

EnterMBA

Senior Manager
Joined: 27 Oct 2013
Posts: 252
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT Date: 03-02-2015
GPA: 3.88
Re: Archaeologists in Michigan have excavated a Native American camp near [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2014, 20:29
Option B seems too extreme to me...
Current Student
Status: Everyone is a leader. Just stop listening to others.
Joined: 22 Mar 2013
Posts: 952
Location: India
GPA: 3.51
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Archaeologists in Michigan have excavated a Native American camp near [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Aug 2014, 00:43
1
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
NEW PROJECT!: Back to basic => Give your explanation- Get Kudos Point for best explanation

Archaeologists in Michigan have excavated a Native American camp near Dumaw Creek. Radiocarbon dating of animal bones found at the site indicates that the camp dates from some time between 1605 and 1755. However, the camp probably dates to no later than 1630, since no European trade goods were found at the site, and European traders were active in the region from the 1620's onward.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
A. Due to trade among Native Americans, some European trade goods would have reached the area before the European traders themselves did.
B. At all camps in the region that have been reliably dated to the late 1620's, remains of European trade goods have been found.
C. The first European trade goods to reach the area would have been considered especially valuable and preserved as much as possible from loss or destruction.
D. The first European traders in the area followed soon after the first European explorers.
E. The site is that of a temporary camp that would have been used seasonally for a few years and then abandoned
_________________

Piyush K
-----------------------
Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is to try just one more time. ― Thomas A. Edison
Don't forget to press--> Kudos
My Articles: 1. WOULD: when to use? | 2. All GMATPrep RCs (New)
Tip: Before exam a week earlier don't forget to exhaust all gmatprep problems specially for "sentence correction".

Current Student
Status: Everyone is a leader. Just stop listening to others.
Joined: 22 Mar 2013
Posts: 952
Location: India
GPA: 3.51
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Archaeologists in Michigan have excavated a Native American camp near [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Aug 2014, 00:43
1
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Hand-picked collection of RCs for those who are aiming 700++

Veritas RCs : Try them back to back / Post your TIME per RC and ANSWER on respective thread.

Let us see who is MASTERO of RC.

fresh-erythropoietin-known-also-as-epo-175591.html
fresh-thomas-henry-huxley-175292.html
while-popular-science-tends-to-favor-extragalactic-142211.html

One should take 38-45 min to complete them. If not then practice practice practice ... 4 RCs daily to command tricks and methods.
One can definitely improve in RC by practicing.
_________________

Piyush K
-----------------------
Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is to try just one more time. ― Thomas A. Edison
Don't forget to press--> Kudos
My Articles: 1. WOULD: when to use? | 2. All GMATPrep RCs (New)
Tip: Before exam a week earlier don't forget to exhaust all gmatprep problems specially for "sentence correction".

Manager
Joined: 27 Jul 2012
Posts: 126
Re: Archaeologists in Michigan have excavated a Native American camp near [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Aug 2014, 03:10
the camp probably dates to no later than 1630, since no European trade goods were found at the site, and European traders were active in the region from the 1620's onward.

if the camps dates to later than 1630, European trade goods must be found at the site

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
A. Due to trade among Native Americans, some European trade goods would have reached the area before the European traders themselves did.

this option emphasis that before 1620 European goods could be found on the region. but reaching European goods even before 1620 does not show that the European goods must be present in all sites of the region.

B. At all camps in the region that have been reliably dated to the late 1620's, remains of European trade goods have been found.

C. The first European trade goods to reach the area would have been considered especially valuable and preserved as much as possible from loss or destruction.
the value of the goods are out of scope

D. The first European traders in the area followed soon after the first European explorers.
this option does not have any effect on the conclusion

E. The site is that of a temporary camp that would have been used seasonally for a few years and then abandoned

how often the site would have been used is out of the scope of the argument
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Posts: 529
Concentration: Technology, Other
Re: Archaeologists in Michigan have excavated a Native American camp near [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Sep 2014, 05:50
Archaeologists in Michigan have excavated a Native American camp near Dumaw Creek.
Radiocarbon dating of animal bones found at the site indicates that the camp dates from some time between 1605 and 1755. However, the camp probably dates to no later than 1630, since no European trade goods were found at the site, and European traders were active in the region from the 1620's onward.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
A. Due to trade among Native Americans, some European trade goods would have reached the area before the European traders themselves did.
>>Weakens the arg.
B. At all camps in the region that have been reliably dated to the late 1620's, remains of European trade goods have been found.
C. The first European trade goods to reach the area would have been considered especially valuable and preserved as much as possible from loss or destruction.
>>Doesn't matter if first goods were not stored properly.There should have been some proof of the goods that followed post them.
D. The first European traders in the area followed soon after the first European explorers.
>>Arrival of Explorer doesn't help.We need to show that goods didnt reach there before 1920.
E. The site is that of a temporary camp that would have been used seasonally for a few years and then abandoned
>>Irrelevant.
_________________

--------------------------------------------------------
Regards

Director
Joined: 25 Apr 2012
Posts: 721
Location: India
GPA: 3.21
Re: Archaeologists in Michigan have excavated a Native American camp near [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Sep 2014, 02:22
1
KUDOS
ankurgupta03 wrote:
Bumping the topic.
Any insights on what is wrong with C?

I know you need not worry about the answer now but here is my take

Reason why C may be wrong is that the first European trade goods would have been valuable and preserved as much as possible from Loss or Destruction meaning that no matter what because of its value the goods would have preserved or kept safely...so finding them at excavation sites is less likely...so it does not help us strengthen the conclusion....
_________________

“If you can't fly then run, if you can't run then walk, if you can't walk then crawl, but whatever you do you have to keep moving forward.”

Current Student
Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Posts: 1439
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.35
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Re: Archaeologists in Michigan have excavated a Native American camp near [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jan 2015, 02:10
WoundedTiger wrote:

I know you need not worry about the answer now but here is my take

Reason why C may be wrong is that the first European trade goods would have been valuable and preserved as much as possible from Loss or Destruction meaning that no matter what because of its value the goods would have preserved or kept safely...so finding them at excavation sites is less likely...so it does not help us strengthen the conclusion....

WoundedTiger Read this post today and it left a big smile on my face
_________________

ISB Preparation Kit | GMAT Debrief

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

MBA Section Director
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 4834
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Re: Archaeologists in Michigan have excavated a Native American camp near [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Feb 2015, 06:04
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED

GMAT Club Revision Project - CR Q1

Please post a detailed explanation and answer to this question to get a chance to get Kudos and your explanation posted on the GMAT Club Revision PDF

Archaeologists in Michigan have excavated a Native American camp near Dumaw Creek. Radiocarbon dating of animal bones found at the site indicates that the camp dates from some time between 1605 and 1755. However, the camp probably dates to no later than 1630, since no European trade goods were found at the site, and European traders were active in the region from the 1620's onward.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

A. Due to trade among Native Americans, some European trade goods would have reached the area before the European traders themselves did.

B. At all camps in the region that have been reliably dated to the late 1620's, remains of European trade goods have been found.

C. The first European trade goods to reach the area would have been considered especially valuable and preserved as much as possible from loss or destruction.

D. The first European traders in the area followed soon after the first European explorers.

E. The site is that of a temporary camp that would have been used seasonally for a few years and then abandoned.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
OA - 1 day

_________________
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Posts: 529
Concentration: Technology, Other
Re: Archaeologists in Michigan have excavated a Native American camp near [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Feb 2015, 08:10
1
KUDOS
Archaeologists in Michigan have excavated a Native American camp near Dumaw Creek.
Radiocarbon indicates that the camp dates from some time between 1605 and 1755.
However, the camp probably dates to no later than 1630, since no European trade goods were found at the site, and European traders were active in the region from the 1620's onward.

Colored is premise and bold is conclusion.Conclusion is based upon the absence of trade good.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
A. Due to trade among Native Americans, some European trade goods would have reached the area before the European traders themselves did.
>>Weakens the arg.
B. At all camps in the region that have been reliably dated to the late 1620's, remains of European trade goods have been found.
>> This supports author's argument.

C. The first European trade goods to reach the area would have been considered especially valuable and preserved as much as possible from loss or destruction.
>>Doesn't matter if first goods were not stored properly.There should have been some proof of the goods that followed post them.
D. The first European traders in the area followed soon after the first European explorers.
>>Arrival of Explorer doesn't help.We need to show that goods didnt reach there before 1920.
E. The site is that of a temporary camp that would have been used seasonally for a few years and then abandoned
>>Irrelevant.
_________________

--------------------------------------------------------
Regards

Manager
Status: Manager
Affiliations: Manager
Joined: 06 Nov 2012
Posts: 169
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Sustainability
Schools: Boston U '19 (D)
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q49 V33
GPA: 3
WE: Supply Chain Management (Energy and Utilities)
Re: Archaeologists in Michigan have excavated a Native American camp near [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Feb 2015, 08:53
IMO is B

It supports the argument.
_________________

Hard-work, Perseverance and Commitment.....

Intern
Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Posts: 18
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
Schools: ISB '18
GMAT Date: 03-15-2015
WE: Operations (Telecommunications)
Re: Archaeologists in Michigan have excavated a Native American camp near [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Feb 2015, 01:25
1
KUDOS
Edit: Archaeologists in Michigan have excavated a Native American camp near Dumaw Creek. Radiocarbon dating of animal bones found at the site indicates that the camp dates from some time between 1605 and 1755. However, the camp probably dates to no later than 1630, since no European trade goods were found at the site, and European traders were active in the region from the 1620's onward.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

A. Due to trade among Native Americans, some European trade goods would have reached the area before the European traders themselves did.

B. At all camps in the region that have been reliably dated to the late 1620's, remains of European trade goods have been found.

C. The first European trade goods to reach the area would have been considered especially valuable and preserved as much as possible from loss or destruction.

D. The first European traders in the area followed soon after the first European explorers.

E. The site is that of a temporary camp that would have been used seasonally for a few years and then abandoned.

A - Out of scope, what reached first is out question
B - All camps had european goods, hence if this camp had been around 1630-- It would have contained european goods .
C - Preserving as much possible does not imply - trade goods would be available after 400 years.
D - Out of scope
E - Out of scope - No mention of the goods
Intern
Joined: 06 Nov 2014
Posts: 6
Re: Archaeologists in Michigan have excavated a Native American camp near [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Feb 2015, 16:18
3
KUDOS
A- if the goods have reached then they could have found it. But they did not find it. So it WEAKENS THE ARGUMENT
B- CORRECT - agrees with the author that it can not be beyond 1930 since all the camps after 1920 in that region were found to have european Trade goods
C- Doesnt matter
D- doesnt matter
E- doesnt matter
Director
Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Posts: 578
GMAT 1: 630 Q49 V27
Re: Archaeologists in Michigan have excavated a Native American camp near [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Mar 2015, 02:15
1
KUDOS
souvik101990 wrote:

GMAT Club Revision Project - CR Q1

Please post a detailed explanation and answer to this question to get a chance to get Kudos and your explanation posted on the GMAT Club Revision PDF

Archaeologists in Michigan have excavated a Native American camp near Dumaw Creek. Radiocarbon dating of animal bones found at the site indicates that the camp dates from some time between 1605 and 1755. However, the camp probably dates to no later than 1630, since no European trade goods were found at the site, and European traders were active in the region from the 1620's onward.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

A. Due to trade among Native Americans, some European trade goods would have reached the area before the European traders themselves did.

B. At all camps in the region that have been reliably dated to the late 1620's, remains of European trade goods have been found.

C. The first European trade goods to reach the area would have been considered especially valuable and preserved as much as possible from loss or destruction.

D. The first European traders in the area followed soon after the first European explorers.

E. The site is that of a temporary camp that would have been used seasonally for a few years and then abandoned.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
OA - 1 day

Hi there,

why don't you provide OA for most of your questions even after months ?
Please follow the forum rule , it applies equally to everyone in the gmatclub .

Thanks
Lucky
_________________

Thanks,
Lucky

_______________________________________________________
Kindly press the to appreciate my post !!

Manager
Joined: 25 Apr 2013
Posts: 66
Re: Archaeologists in Michigan have excavated a Native American camp near [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Mar 2015, 08:30
Yes, B looks like the only answer feasible, among the given answer choices. Since remains of European trade goods have been found at all camps in the region that have been reliably dated to the late 1620's, it gives us a reason to believe that if the excavated Native American camp near Dumaw Creek dated later than 1630, then some European trade good would have been found in the excavation.

Also, is this really a 700 level question, as indicated in the tag? I think it might be a bit on the easier side.
Intern
Joined: 18 Mar 2015
Posts: 4
Re: Archaeologists in Michigan have excavated a Native American camp near [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Mar 2015, 09:39
1
KUDOS
A- if the goods have reached then they could have found it. But they did not find it. So it WEAKENS THE ARGUMENT
B- CORRECT - agrees with the author that it can not be beyond 1930 since all the camps after 1920 in that region were found to have european Trade goods
C- Doesnt matter
D- doesnt matter
E- doesnt matter

thanks for the explanation. quite helpful actually. but it will be really nice if you can help me out in understanding concepts.
Manager
Joined: 22 Aug 2014
Posts: 189
Re: Archaeologists in Michigan have excavated a Native American camp near [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 May 2015, 04:17
souvik101990 wrote:

GMAT Club Revision Project - CR Q1

Please post a detailed explanation and answer to this question to get a chance to get Kudos and your explanation posted on the GMAT Club Revision PDF

Archaeologists in Michigan have excavated a Native American camp near Dumaw Creek. Radiocarbon dating of animal bones found at the site indicates that the camp dates from some time between 1605 and 1755. However, the camp probably dates to no later than 1630, since no European trade goods were found at the site, and European traders were active in the region from the 1620's onward.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

A. Due to trade among Native Americans, some European trade goods would have reached the area before the European traders themselves did.

B. At all camps in the region that have been reliably dated to the late 1620's, remains of European trade goods have been found.

C. The first European trade goods to reach the area would have been considered especially valuable and preserved as much as possible from loss or destruction.

D. The first European traders in the area followed soon after the first European explorers.

E. The site is that of a temporary camp that would have been used seasonally for a few years and then abandoned.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
OA - 1 day

A-WEAKENS
C,D,E-OUT OF SCOPE
b LEFT
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10332
Re: Archaeologists in Michigan have excavated a Native American camp near [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 May 2016, 05:43
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Current Student
Joined: 18 Oct 2014
Posts: 902
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.98
Re: Archaeologists in Michigan have excavated a Native American camp near [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 May 2016, 04:35
sondenso wrote:
18.
Archaeologists in Michigan have excavated a Native American camp near Dumaw Creek. Radiocarbon dating of animal bones found at the site indicates that the camp dates from some time between 1605 and 1755. However, the camp probably dates to no later than 1630, since no European trade goods were found at the site, and European traders were active in the region from the 1620's onward.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

(A) Due to trade among Native Americans, some European trade goods would have reached the area before the European traders themselves did.
(B) At all camps in the region that have been reliably dated to the late 1620's, remains of European trade goods have been found.
(C) The first European trade goods to reach the area would have been considered especially valuable and preserved as much as possible from loss or destruction.
(D) The first European traders in the area followed soon after the first European explorers.
(E) The site is that of a temporary camp that would have been used seasonally for a few years and then abandoned.

I lost somewhere!

Radiocarbon dating dates the site at 1605 to 1755. But the conclusion is that camp does not date later than 1630 because no european goods were found at the site, however, european traders were active in the region from 1620's onward.

Basically, no european goods were found concludes that the camp dates no later than 1630. We should have an option either to support this statement or to mention that european goods were found in all camp sites dates after 1930.

(A) Due to trade among Native Americans, some European trade goods would have reached the area before the European traders themselves did. This weakens the argument.
(B) At all camps in the region that have been reliably dated to the late 1620's, remains of European trade goods have been found. This is exactly what we were looking for.
(C) The first European trade goods to reach the area would have been considered especially valuable and preserved as much as possible from loss or destruction. We are not concerned about valuable goods
(D) The first European traders in the area followed soon after the first European explorers. European explorers are not mentioned anywhere in the argument.
(E) The site is that of a temporary camp that would have been used seasonally for a few years and then abandoned. What are those few years?
_________________

I welcome critical analysis of my post!! That will help me reach 700+

Manager
Joined: 08 Jan 2015
Posts: 86
Re: Archaeologists in Michigan have excavated a Native American camp near [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Aug 2016, 01:37
1
KUDOS
Still don't understand why C is flawed. As for me the reasoning is the following:

1) Traders were active in the region starting with late 1620'. Therefore, since no goods were found in the camp, the camp must have been held before that period. We need to find something, that strengthens this point by either providing the additional evidence or by eliminating alternative reasons, why the goods were not found.

Option C states that - these goods were especially valuable and therefore there was no possibility that they were either lost or destroyed. Therefore, the only viable reason why the goods were not found in the camp - the camp was held before traders reached these lands.
So this option eliminates the an reason and therefore strengthens the argument.

Even though I agree that option B strengthens the argument too, I can't say that it strengthens the argument more than option C does. Moreover, from my experience, options that provide evidence from towns/villages/schools nearby are VERY RARELY the right choice.
Re: Archaeologists in Michigan have excavated a Native American camp near   [#permalink] 25 Aug 2016, 01:37

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3    Next  [ 48 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by