We can treat the two spins as independent events, so the key idea here is that the probability of two independent outcomes happening one after another is the product of their individual probabilities.
Since Prize 1 is 1/3 and Prize 2 is 2/3, the only way a player does not get the prize they want is by missing on both spins.
For someone who wants Prize 1, the "wrong result" each time is Prize 2, which has probability 2/3.
Missing twice is (2/3) × (2/3) = 4/9,
so the chance of eventually getting Prize 1 is 1 − 4/9 = 5/9 ≈ 0.56, rounded to 0.5.
For a player who wants Prize 2, the wrong outcome is Prize 1 with probability 1/3.
Missing twice is (1/3) × (1/3) = 1/9,
so the success rate is 1 − 1/9 = 8/9 ≈ 0.89, rounded to 0.9.
This kind of multiplication rule appears all the time in probability problems, and it shows up naturally in gambling scenarios. A classic example is roulette, where each spin is independent just like in this question. On a European wheel the probability of landing on red is 18/37, while on an American wheel it drops to 18/38 because of the extra pocket. The chance of losing two red bets in a row is therefore (19/37)2 ≈ 0.264 in Europe but (20/38)2 ≈ 0.277 in the U.S. I came across comparisons like this on sites such as
onlinecasinovelemenyek.com and they really help build intuition for situations like this where independent outcomes combine through multiplication.