AbhivasThe solution depends on the strength of a likelihood of an event happening.
As can be seen, in both the blanks we are expected to fit in positive scenario or affirmative case.
So the options conveying negative meaning can be discarded. ‘Seldom, if ever, had’ and ‘tend not to have’ can be discarded.
Let us check the remaining options now.
A.
tend to have: regularly behave/act in a particular way. So a general way that could be seen majority of time.
B.
Almost always had: This is a very strong relationship. If I were to give a number I would say we talk of a thing happening at least 95% times.
C.
Possibly had: The range of event happening could start as low as 10%. Maybe a slight chance.
Now the blanks that have to be replaced.
Blank 1. Words should replace ‘strong positive correlation’. Now this would mean in most of the cases but is not extreme as shown by words ‘almost always had’. Only possibility -
tend to haveBlank 2. Words should replace ‘more often than not’ and ‘strong negative correlation’. Again this would mean in most of the cases. Just tells us that the trend is in a particular way but not as extreme as the words ‘almost always had’. Only possibility -
tend to haveMy views purely on logical aspect.
I am sure
GMATNinja would pitch in with verbal aspects.