GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 22 Sep 2018, 08:07

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

At the press conference, the CEO denied in the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Apr 2012
Posts: 275
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, Other
GPA: 2.44
WE: Project Management (Telecommunications)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
At the press conference, the CEO denied in the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 10 Feb 2014, 22:13
2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

56% (01:15) correct 44% (01:24) wrong based on 256 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

At the press conference, the CEO denied in the most strenuous terms that his corporation's lawyers for the six charged senior officers they could provide undue favorable influence in the imminent embezzlement trials.

A) for the six charged senior officers they could provide
B) for the six senior charged officers had the ability of providing
C) had the ability, for the six senior officers charged, of providing
D) were able to provide for the six senior officers charged
E) being able to provide for the six senior charged officers

OA to follow ..

Originally posted by guerrero25 on 10 Feb 2014, 05:53.
Last edited by guerrero25 on 10 Feb 2014, 22:13, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jan 2013
Posts: 157
Re: At the press conference, the CEO denied in the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Feb 2014, 06:28
2
At the press conference, the CEO denied in the most strenuous terms that his corporation's lawyers for the six charged senior officers they could provide undue favorable influence in the imminent embezzlement trials.

pre-thinking - a verb should be present in the relative pronoun clause (that his corp ....)

A) for the six charged senior officers they could provide
based on prethinking, there is no verb corresponding to the subject - that his corp's lawyers. Eliminate

B) for the six senior charged officers had the ability of providing
The verb 'had' seems to talk about the action of officers, than the lawyers. Additionally, the construction is verbose, owing to the usage of noun form - ability of providing'. Eliminate.

C) had the ability, for the six senior officers charged, of providing
Unnecessary usage of 'past perfect'. Verbose in that noun form (ability of providing) is used. The placement of the parenthetical element is wrong. Eliminate

D) were able to provide for the six senior officers charged
Verb is good. Participle modifies officers perfectly well. Verb form is also good and concise. Right answer

E) being able to provide for the six senior charged officers
Present continuous (of be) is not needed. Placement of participle is wrong. Eliminate.
_________________

Read my posts...
What are modifiers ??

Retired Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4542
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: At the press conference, the CEO denied in the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Feb 2014, 09:27
2
The text is a convoluted sentence without proper punctuation’

A) for the six charged senior officers they could provide --- The problem here is the pronoun ’they’ which is redundant and renders the sentence a fragment, with one verb for two subjects. There should be a comma after officers to set off the officers from modifying the providing of undue influence.

B) for the six senior charged officers had the ability of providing --- meaning changed; providing influence is shifted to officers wrongly

C) had the ability, for the six senior officers charged, of providing --- ‘had the ability of providing’ is wrong idiom. Correct idiom is ‘had the ability to provide. ----

D) were able to provide for the six senior officers charged---- maybe the best of the lot although still were able to provide is wordier than ‘could provide’

E) being able to provide for the six senior charged officers --- ‘being able to provide’ --- here being able to does not have a full verb; the relative clause is a fragment since it lacks a verb such as ‘were’.
_________________

you can know a lot about something and not really understand it."-- a quote
No one knows this better than a GMAT student does.
Narendran +9198845 44509

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Apr 2012
Posts: 297
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 650 Q48 V31
GMAT 2: 770 Q50 V47
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: At the press conference, the CEO denied in the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Feb 2014, 13:20
guerrero25 wrote:
At the press conference, the CEO denied in the most strenuous terms that his corporation's lawyers for the six charged senior officers they could provide undue favorable influence in the imminent embezzlement trials.

A) for the six charged senior officers they could provide
B) for the six senior charged officers had the ability of providing
C) had the ability, for the six senior officers charged, of providing
D) were able to provide for the six senior officers charged
E) being able to provide for the six senior charged officers

OA to follow ..


From the underline text onwards, the sentence is trying to say:
corporation's lawyers provided undue favorable influence in the imminent embezzlement trials. The lawyers did this for the six charged senior officers.

A: they is ambiguous (lawyers vs officers)
B, C: awkward wording - had the ability of providing, ability to is the correct idiom
E: being able is awkward and very indirect way of saying when a better option D is available.

D is concise and good with placing the subject and verb as close as possible .
_________________

"Appreciation is a wonderful thing. It makes what is excellent in others belong to us as well."
― Voltaire


Press Kudos, if I have helped.
Thanks!

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 18 Nov 2013
Posts: 69
Location: India
GMAT Date: 12-26-2014
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: At the press conference, the CEO denied in the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Feb 2014, 22:08
I have a doubt in options "C" and "D". The statement says "...they could provide". Shouldn't it be "C" then as "D" clearly says "..were able to" which sort conflicts with the problem statement?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 21 Jul 2017
Posts: 141
Location: India
Concentration: Social Entrepreneurship, Leadership
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V33
GPA: 4
WE: Project Management (Education)
Re: At the press conference, the CEO denied in the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Apr 2018, 11:45
From Magoosh:

1) Split #1: the word orders “the six charged senior officers” and “the six senior charged officers” are awkward: answers (A) & (B) & (E) have these variants. It sounds awkward to mix the participle “charged” with ordinary adjectives. The order “the six senior officers charged” sounds considerably more natural — it separates the adjective before the noun, where they should be, and the participle after the noun.

Split #2: idiom. The idioms “able to do X” or “ability to do X” are correct, and the idiom “ability of doing X” is wrong: choices (B) & (C) make this mistake.

Split #3: missing verb. In choice (E), instead of a full verb inside the “that” clause, we have only a participle, “being” — the subject “lawyers” has no legitimate verb. (E) is incorrect.

Split #4: double subject. In choice (A), we have the structure “… lawyers … they could provide” — both the noun “lawyers” and the pronoun “they” could be the subject of the verb, but they can’t both be the subject of the same verb simultaneously.

For all these reasons, (D) is the only possible answer.
Re: At the press conference, the CEO denied in the &nbs [#permalink] 10 Apr 2018, 11:45
Display posts from previous: Sort by

At the press conference, the CEO denied in the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.