GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 24 Jun 2019, 15:31

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Bernard Bailyn has recently reinterpreted the early history of

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Retired Moderator
Status: Long way to go!
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Posts: 1345
Location: Viet Nam
Bernard Bailyn has recently reinterpreted the early history of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Aug 2017, 09:08
2
6
Question 1
00:00

based on 211 sessions

76% (03:18) correct 24% (03:31) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 2
00:00

based on 262 sessions

83% (00:57) correct 17% (01:14) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 3
00:00

based on 266 sessions

72% (00:54) correct 28% (01:06) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 4
00:00

based on 255 sessions

65% (01:14) correct 35% (01:41) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 5
00:00

based on 256 sessions

86% (01:04) correct 14% (01:08) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 6
00:00

based on 244 sessions

83% (00:45) correct 17% (00:58) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 7
00:00

based on 246 sessions

79% (01:09) correct 21% (01:33) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 8
00:00

based on 235 sessions

43% (01:43) correct 57% (01:26) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Bernard Bailyn has recently reinterpreted the early history of the United States by applying new social research findings on the experiences of European migrants. In his reinterpretation, migration becomes the organizing principle for rewriting the history of preindustrial North America. His approach rests on four separate propositions.

The first of these asserts that residents of early modern England moved regularly about their countryside; migrating to the New World was simply a “natural spillover.” Although at first the colonies held little positive attraction for the English—they would rather have stayed home—by the eighteenth century people increasingly migrated to America because they regarded it as the land of opportunity. Secondly, Bailyn holds that, contrary to the notion that used to flourish in America history textbooks, there was never a typical New World community. For example, the economic and demographic character of early New England towns varied considerably.

Bailyn’s third proposition suggests two general patterns prevailing among the many thousands of migrants: one group came as indentured servants, another came to acquire land. Surprisingly, Bailyn suggests that those who recruited indentured servants were the driving forces of transatlantic migration. These colonial entrepreneurs helped determine the social character of people who came to preindustrial North America. At first, thousands of unskilled laborers were recruited; by the 1730’s, however, American employers demanded skilled artisans.

Finally, Bailyn argues that the colonies were a half-civilized hinterland of the European culture system. He is undoubtedly correct to insist that the colonies were part of an Anglo-American empire. But to divide the empire into English core and colonial periphery, as Bailyn does, devalues the achievements of colonial culture. It is true, as Bailyn claims, that high culture in the colonies never matched that in England. But what of seventeenth-century New England, where the settlers created effective laws, built a distinguished university, and published books? Bailyn might respond that New England was exceptional. However, the ideas and institutions developed by New England Puritans had powerful effects on North American culture.

Although Bailyn goes on to apply his approach to some thousands of indentured servants who migrated just prior to the revolution, he fails to link their experience with the political development of the United States. Evidence presented in his work suggests how we might make such a connection. These indentured servants were treated as slaves for the period during which they had sold their time to American employers. It is not surprising that as soon as they served their time they passed up good wages in the cities and headed west to ensure their personal independence by acquiring land. Thus, it is in the west that a peculiarly American political culture began, among colonists who were suspicious of authority and intensely anti-aristocratic.
Which of the following statements about migrants to colonial North America is supported by information in the passage?

(A) A larger percentage of migrants to colonial North America came as indentured servants than as free agents interested in acquiring land.

(B) Migrants who came to the colonies as indentured servants were more successful at making a livelihood than were farmers and artisans.

(C) Migrants to colonial North America were more successful at acquiring their own land during the eighteenth century than during the seven-tenth century.

(D) By the 1730’s, migrants already skilled in a trade were in more demand by American employers than were unskilled laborers.

(E) A significant percentage of migrants who came to the colonies to acquire land were forced to work as field hands for prosperous American farmers.
Spoiler: :: OA
D

The author of the passage states that Bailyn failed to

(A) give sufficient emphasis to the cultural and political interdependence of the colonies and England

(B) describe carefully how migrants of different ethnic backgrounds preserved their culture in the united States

(C) take advantage of social research on the experiences of colonists who migrated to colonial North America specifically to acquire land

(D) relate the experience of the migrants to the political values that eventually shaped the character of the United States

(E) investigate the lives of Europeans before they came to colonial North America to determine more adequately their motivations for migrating
Spoiler: :: OA
D

Which of the following best summarizes the author’s evaluation of Bailyn’s fourth proposition?

(A) It is totally implausible.
(B) It is partially correct.
(D) It is controversial though persuasive.
(E) It is intriguing though unsubstantiated.
Spoiler: :: OA
B

According to the passage, Bailyn and the author agree on which of the following statements about the culture of colonial New England?

(A) High culture in New England never equaled the high culture of England.
(B) The cultural achievements of colonial New England have generally been unrecognized by historians.
(C) The colonists imitated the high culture of England, and did not develop a culture that was uniquely their own.
(D) The southern colonies were greatly influenced by the high culture of New England.
(E) New England communities were able to create laws and build a university, but unable to create anything innovative in the arts.
Spoiler: :: OA
A

According to the passage, which of the following is true of English migrants to the colonies during the eighteenth century?

(A) Most of them were farmers rather than trades people or artisans.
(B) Most of them came because they were unable to find work in England.
(C) They differed from other English people in that they were willing to travel.
(D) They expected that the colonies would offer them increased opportunity.
(E) They were generally not as educated as the people who remained in England.
Spoiler: :: OA
D

The author of the passage is primarily concerned with

(A) comparing several current interpretations of early American history
(B) suggesting that new social research on migration should lead to revisions in current interpretations of early American history
(C) providing the theoretical framework that is used by most historians in understanding early American history
(D) refuting an argument about early American history that has been proposed by social historians
(E) discussing a reinterpretation of early American history that is based on new social research on migration
Spoiler: :: OA
E

It can be inferred from the passage that American history textbooks used to assert that

(A) many migrants to colonial North America were not successful financially
(B) more migrants came to America out of religious or political conviction that came in the hope of acquiring land
(C) New England communities were much alike in terms of their economics and demographics
(D) many migrants to colonial North America failed to maintain ties with their European relations
(E) the level of literacy in New England communities was very high
Spoiler: :: OA
C

The author of the passage would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements about Bailyn’s work?

(A) Bailyn underestimates the effects of Puritan thought on North American culture.

(B) Bailyn overemphasizes the economic dependence of the colonies on Great Britain.

(C) Bailyn’s description of the colonies as part of an Anglo-American empire is misleading and incorrect.

(D) Bailyn failed to test his propositions on a specific group of migrants to colonial North America.

(E) Bailyn overemphasizes the experiences of migrants to the New England colonies, and neglects the southern and the western parts of the New World.
Spoiler: :: OA
A

_________________
VP
Status: Learning
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Posts: 1007
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE: Engineering (Manufacturing)
Re: Bernard Bailyn has recently reinterpreted the early history of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Aug 2017, 10:06
1
First and last wrong rest all correct
It was a nice passage .
Please provide official explanation for question 1
_________________
MBA Section Director
Affiliations: GMATClub
Joined: 22 May 2017
Posts: 2526
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Re: Bernard Bailyn has recently reinterpreted the early history of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Oct 2018, 19:17

+1 kudos to the posts containing answer explanations of all questions

_________________
Manager
Joined: 14 Jun 2018
Posts: 223
Bernard Bailyn has recently reinterpreted the early history of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Oct 2018, 00:23
For Q1 , i assume D is based on "At first, thousands of unskilled laborers were recruited; by the 1730’s, however, American employers demanded skilled artisans."

how can you conclude skilled laborers were in more demand than unskilled laborers
Intern
Joined: 06 Oct 2018
Posts: 2
Location: India
Re: Bernard Bailyn has recently reinterpreted the early history of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Oct 2018, 09:16
Got 5 and 8 wrong.
Please provide official explanation for questions.
Intern
Joined: 21 Aug 2018
Posts: 1
Re: Bernard Bailyn has recently reinterpreted the early history of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Oct 2018, 10:13
CR Forum Moderator
Joined: 25 Apr 2018
Posts: 578
Bernard Bailyn has recently reinterpreted the early history of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Oct 2018, 20:47
1
vishul wrote:

vishul
Refer to the following excerpt from last 2 lines of para 4.Based on this we can tell that option A is correct.

Quote:
Bailyn might respond that New England was exceptional. However, the ideas and institutions developed by New England Puritans had powerful effects on North American culture.

Hope this helps!
_________________

Project CR Butler - 2 CR's everyday
Manager
Joined: 02 Sep 2018
Posts: 67
Location: United States
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Bernard Bailyn has recently reinterpreted the early history of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Oct 2018, 10:42
2
broall, arvind910619, workout, pandeyashwin, srakshit91

Regarding Q1:
Which of the following statements about migrants to colonial North America is supported by information in the passage?

(A) A larger percentage of migrants to colonial North America came as indentured servants than as free agents interested in acquiring land.
My Analysis: Not given in passage.
Reason: The passage 3 talks about 2 major categories: a) servants and b) ppl came to acquire land; the passage does not give any comparison or statistics on %age distribution

(B) Migrants who came to the colonies as indentured servants were more successful at making a livelihood than were farmers and artisans.
My Analysis: Not given in passage.
Reason: The passage 3 or entire passage did not mention about farmers. there is no comparison given for farmers VS artisans.

(C) Migrants to colonial North America were more successful at acquiring their own land during the eighteenth century than during the seven-tenth century.
My Analysis: Not given in passage.
Reason: again, this is not given in the passage. there is no comparison between success rate of ppl during 18th VS 17th century.

(D) By the 1730’s, migrants already skilled in a trade were in more demand by American employers than were unskilled laborers.
My Analysis: CORRECT: given in passage.
Reason: Option D can be inferred from the last sentence of para 3:
These colonial entrepreneurs helped determine the social character of people who came to preindustrial North America. At first, thousands of unskilled laborers were recruited; by the 1730’s, however, American employers demanded skilled artisans.
Further explanation of D is given below.
--------------
Quote:
@ pandeyashwin : you asked --> how can you conclude skilled laborers were in more demand than unskilled laborers

yes, we can definitely say that skilled laborers were in more demand. This is because, author clearly calls out that, at first, unskilled laborers were recruited. The word "however" suggests that unskilled laborers didn't satisfy the need of the job. the job required skilled labor hence the need for skilled laborers was in more as comparted to that of unskilled laborers.
--------------
(E) A significant percentage of migrants who came to the colonies to acquire land were forced to work as field hands for prosperous American farmers.
My Analysis: Not given in passage.
Reason: again, this is not given in the passage. there is no mention of farmers.

I hope this is clear now.

Give Kudos even if you disagree
Manager
Joined: 02 Sep 2018
Posts: 67
Location: United States
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Bernard Bailyn has recently reinterpreted the early history of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Oct 2018, 10:55
1
srakshit91: for Q5:

According to the passage, which of the following is true of English migrants to the colonies during the eighteenth century?

(A) Most of them were farmers rather than trades people or artisans.
(B) Most of them came because they were unable to find work in England.
(C) They differed from other English people in that they were willing to travel.
(D) They expected that the colonies would offer them increased opportunity.
(E) They were generally not as educated as the people who remained in England.

To understand this, please refer to para 2:
The first of these asserts that residents of early modern England moved regularly about their countryside; migrating to the New World was simply a “natural spillover.” Although at first the colonies held little positive attraction for the English—they would rather have stayed home—by the eighteenth century people increasingly migrated to America because they regarded it as the land of opportunity.

From the bold and underlined text above, we can interpret that ppl traveled from England to America as later would provide increased opportunity. All other options are either not given OR can't be interpreted from the para.

I hope it's clear now.

---
Please give kudos even if you disagree.
Manager
Joined: 18 Feb 2018
Posts: 114
Re: Bernard Bailyn has recently reinterpreted the early history of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jan 2019, 00:33
12 minutes, 5/8 correct. Can someone please explain Q8?

Help is greatly appreciated. Thanks!
Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Mar 2018
Posts: 268
Re: Bernard Bailyn has recently reinterpreted the early history of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jan 2019, 22:11
gmat1393 GMATNinja daagh AjiteshArun workout Skywalker18
In Q3 why D is wrong ?
It is controversial and persuasive I found it correct
Verbal Forum Moderator
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2300
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Bernard Bailyn has recently reinterpreted the early history of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jan 2019, 10:08
Took almost 15 mins, including 5 mins to read the passage.

1. Which of the following statements about migrants to colonial North America is supported by information in the passage?[/b]

(D) By the 1730’s, migrants already skilled in a trade were in more demand by American employers than were unskilled laborers.- Correct
At first, thousands of unskilled laborers were recruited; by the 1730’s, however, American employers demanded skilled artisans.

2. The author of the passage states that Bailyn failed to
Although Bailyn goes on to apply his approach to some thousands of indentured servants who migrated just prior to the revolution, he fails to link their experience with the political development of the United States.
(D) relate the experience of the migrants to the political values that eventually shaped the character of the United States- Correct

3. Which of the following best summarizes the author’s evaluation of Bailyn’s fourth proposition?

He is undoubtedly correct to insist that the colonies were part of an Anglo-American empire. But to divide the empire into English core and colonial periphery, as Bailyn does, devalues the achievements of colonial culture. It is true, as Bailyn claims, that high culture in the colonies never matched that in England.

(B) It is partially correct.- Correct; The author agrees with a part of Bailyn's fourth proposition but does not agree with a part of the same.

4. According to the passage, Bailyn and the author agree on which of the following statements about the culture of colonial New England?

(A) High culture in New England never equaled the high culture of England.- Correct
It is true, as Bailyn claims, that high culture in the colonies never matched that in England.

5. According to the passage, which of the following is true of English migrants to the colonies during the eighteenth century?
Although at first the colonies held little positive attraction for the English—they would rather have stayed home—by the eighteenth century people increasingly migrated to America because they regarded it as the land of opportunity.
(D) They expected that the colonies would offer them increased opportunity.- Correct

6. The author of the passage is primarily concerned with[
(E) discussing a reinterpretation of early American history that is based on new social research on migration- Correct

7. It can be inferred from the passage that American history textbooks used to assert that
Secondly, Bailyn holds that, contrary to the notion that used to flourish in America history textbooks, there was never a typical New World community.
(C) New England communities were much alike in terms of their economics and demographics- Correct

8. The author of the passage would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements about Bailyn’s work?

(A) Bailyn underestimates the effects of Puritan thought on North American culture.- Correct
But to divide the empire into English core and colonial periphery, as Bailyn does, devalues the achievements of colonial culture. It is true, as Bailyn claims, that high culture in the colonies never matched that in England. But what of seventeenth-century New England, where the settlers created effective laws, built a distinguished university, and published books? Bailyn might respond that New England was exceptional. However, the ideas and institutions developed by New England Puritans had powerful effects on North American culture.

teaserbae wrote:
gmat1393 GMATNinja daagh AjiteshArun workout Skywalker18
In Q3 why D is wrong ?
It is controversial and persuasive I found it correct

As per the author’s evaluation, the fourth proposition doesn't seem to be controversial/debatable and persuasive. The author does not debate about it but rather agrees with a part of the fourth proposition and disagrees with other.
_________________
When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful
Manager
Joined: 03 Dec 2018
Posts: 192
Re: Bernard Bailyn has recently reinterpreted the early history of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 May 2019, 01:31

"However, the ideas and institutions developed by New England Puritans had powerful effects on North American culture." -author's statement.

How is A right?
Intern
Joined: 15 Feb 2019
Posts: 15
Re: Bernard Bailyn has recently reinterpreted the early history of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 May 2019, 10:30
mallya12 wrote:

"However, the ideas and institutions developed by New England Puritans had powerful effects on North American culture." -author's statement.

How is A right?

*HOWEVER* shows there's a contradiction of the author's view from Bailyn's line of thought.
So Bailyn says "However, the ideas and institutions developed by New England Puritans had powerful effects on North American
It means the Bailyn doesn't think that Puritan had such powerful effect on North America.
So the Author agrees that Bailyn underestimates the effect of Puritan, this is what the question is asking.
Option A says Bailyn underestimates the effect Puritan had on North American Culture...CORRECT!
Hope this helps?

Posted from my mobile device
Intern
Joined: 08 May 2019
Posts: 11
Re: Bernard Bailyn has recently reinterpreted the early history of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 May 2019, 02:37
Can someone please explain question 7?
Manager
Joined: 24 Jul 2018
Posts: 63
Location: India
Schools: IMD
GPA: 4
Bernard Bailyn has recently reinterpreted the early history of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 May 2019, 00:18
2
broall wrote:
Bernard Bailyn has recently reinterpreted the early history of the United States by applying new social research findings on the experiences of European migrants. In his reinterpretation, migration becomes the organizing principle for rewriting the history of preindustrial North America. His approach rests on four separate propositions.

The first of these asserts that residents of early modern England moved regularly about their countryside; migrating to the New World was simply a “natural spillover.” Although at first the colonies held little positive attraction for the English—they would rather have stayed home—by the eighteenth century people increasingly migrated to America because they regarded it as the land of opportunity. Secondly, Bailyn holds that, contrary to the notion that used to flourish in America history textbooks, there was never a typical New World community. For example, the economic and demographic character of early New England towns varied considerably.

Bailyn’s third proposition suggests two general patterns prevailing among the many thousands of migrants: one group came as indentured servants, another came to acquire land. Surprisingly, Bailyn suggests that those who recruited indentured servants were the driving forces of transatlantic migration. These colonial entrepreneurs helped determine the social character of people who came to preindustrial North America. At first, thousands of unskilled laborers were recruited; by the 1730’s, however, American employers demanded skilled artisans.

Finally, Bailyn argues that the colonies were a half-civilized hinterland of the European culture system. He is undoubtedly correct to insist that the colonies were part of an Anglo-American empire. But to divide the empire into English core and colonial periphery, as Bailyn does, devalues the achievements of colonial culture. It is true, as Bailyn claims, that high culture in the colonies never matched that in England. But what of seventeenth-century New England, where the settlers created effective laws, built a distinguished university, and published books? Bailyn might respond that New England was exceptional. However, the ideas and institutions developed by New England Puritans had powerful effects on North American culture.

Although Bailyn goes on to apply his approach to some thousands of indentured servants who migrated just prior to the revolution, he fails to link their experience with the political development of the United States. Evidence presented in his work suggests how we might make such a connection. These indentured servants were treated as slaves for the period during which they had sold their time to American employers. It is not surprising that as soon as they served their time they passed up good wages in the cities and headed west to ensure their personal independence by acquiring land. Thus, it is in the west that a peculiarly American political culture began, among colonists who were suspicious of authority and intensely anti-aristocratic.
Which of the following statements about migrants to colonial North America is supported by information in the passage?

(A) A larger percentage of migrants to colonial North America came as indentured servants than as free agents interested in acquiring land.

(B) Migrants who came to the colonies as indentured servants were more successful at making a livelihood than were farmers and artisans.

(C) Migrants to colonial North America were more successful at acquiring their own land during the eighteenth century than during the seven-tenth century.

(D) By the 1730’s, migrants already skilled in a trade were in more demand by American employers than were unskilled laborers.

(E) A significant percentage of migrants who came to the colonies to acquire land were forced to work as field hands for prosperous American farmers.
Spoiler: :: OA
D

The author of the passage states that Bailyn failed to

(A) give sufficient emphasis to the cultural and political interdependence of the colonies and England

(B) describe carefully how migrants of different ethnic backgrounds preserved their culture in the united States

(C) take advantage of social research on the experiences of colonists who migrated to colonial North America specifically to acquire land

(D) relate the experience of the migrants to the political values that eventually shaped the character of the United States

(E) investigate the lives of Europeans before they came to colonial North America to determine more adequately their motivations for migrating
Spoiler: :: OA
D

Which of the following best summarizes the author’s evaluation of Bailyn’s fourth proposition?

(A) It is totally implausible.
(B) It is partially correct.
(D) It is controversial though persuasive.
(E) It is intriguing though unsubstantiated.
Spoiler: :: OA
B

According to the passage, Bailyn and the author agree on which of the following statements about the culture of colonial New England?

(A) High culture in New England never equaled the high culture of England.
(B) The cultural achievements of colonial New England have generally been unrecognized by historians.
(C) The colonists imitated the high culture of England, and did not develop a culture that was uniquely their own.
(D) The southern colonies were greatly influenced by the high culture of New England.
(E) New England communities were able to create laws and build a university, but unable to create anything innovative in the arts.
Spoiler: :: OA
A

According to the passage, which of the following is true of English migrants to the colonies during the eighteenth century?

(A) Most of them were farmers rather than trades people or artisans.
(B) Most of them came because they were unable to find work in England.
(C) They differed from other English people in that they were willing to travel.
(D) They expected that the colonies would offer them increased opportunity.
(E) They were generally not as educated as the people who remained in England.
Spoiler: :: OA
D

The author of the passage is primarily concerned with

(A) comparing several current interpretations of early American history
(B) suggesting that new social research on migration should lead to revisions in current interpretations of early American history
(C) providing the theoretical framework that is used by most historians in understanding early American history
(D) refuting an argument about early American history that has been proposed by social historians
(E) discussing a reinterpretation of early American history that is based on new social research on migration
Spoiler: :: OA
E

It can be inferred from the passage that American history textbooks used to assert that

(A) many migrants to colonial North America were not successful financially
(B) more migrants came to America out of religious or political conviction that came in the hope of acquiring land
(C) New England communities were much alike in terms of their economics and demographics
(D) many migrants to colonial North America failed to maintain ties with their European relations
(E) the level of literacy in New England communities was very high
Spoiler: :: OA
C

The author of the passage would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements about Bailyn’s work?

(A) Bailyn underestimates the effects of Puritan thought on North American culture.

(B) Bailyn overemphasizes the economic dependence of the colonies on Great Britain.

(C) Bailyn’s description of the colonies as part of an Anglo-American empire is misleading and incorrect.

(D) Bailyn failed to test his propositions on a specific group of migrants to colonial North America.

(E) Bailyn overemphasizes the experiences of migrants to the New England colonies, and neglects the southern and the western parts of the New World.
Spoiler: :: OA
A

Got only Q-4 wrong in 16 mins. Tough passage to understand IMO.
Manager
Joined: 17 Sep 2017
Posts: 90
Re: Bernard Bailyn has recently reinterpreted the early history of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 May 2019, 11:42
Hi, can anyone help me with question 4? didnt the author mentioned that new england was an exception? so , then how option a makes sense?
Re: Bernard Bailyn has recently reinterpreted the early history of   [#permalink] 25 May 2019, 11:42
Display posts from previous: Sort by