Hello,
Harsh2111s. I will draw attention to a few talking points in the answers below, then discuss a few of those points afterwards.
Harsh2111s
Quote:
Biologists working in Spain say that their discovery of teeming life in a highly acidic river may not only broaden the search for life, or for evidence of past life, on other planets but also show that a number of forms of microscopic life can adapt to conditions that scientists have long thought hostile to all but the hardiest bacteria.
(A) show that a number of forms of microscopic life can adapt to conditions that scientists have long thought hostile to all but the hardiest bacteria
(B) may show that a number of forms of microscopic life is capable of adapting to conditions that scientists have long thought hostile to all bacteria but the hardiest ones
(C) shows a number of forms of microscopic life to be capable to adapt to conditions that scientists have long thought had been hostile to all but the hardiest bacteria
(D) showing that a number of forms of microscopic life is capable of adapting to conditions that scientists have long thought had been hostile to all but the hardiest bacteria
(E) showing that a number of forms of microscopic life can adapt to conditions that scientists have long thought hostile to all bacteria but the hardiest
AjiteshArun MentorTutoringI feel discovery of teeming life is singular, hence option C should be correct.
What I am missing here ?
Choice (C) has a few issues. First off, the verb should be
show. The reason is the
not only... but also idiomatic construct. Notice that the first part says
may not only, and also that the first verb is conjugated as
broaden, not
broadens. This
may carries over into the second item, which is why we do not need to repeat it, as in choice (B). Taken together, you would not say,
may not only broaden... but also shows. The next idiom is askew in
capable to adapt, which should instead be
capable of something. Finally, the past perfect at the end of (C) is the wrong tense:
have long thought indicates an ongoing action, and there is no past tense action to use as a basis for comparison to place another action further in the past. The simple past will do instead, even if
were may not appear before
hostile. Notice how choice (A) fixes all the issues I have outlined above:
Biologists working in Spain say that their discovery of teeming life in a highly acidic river may not only broaden the search for life, or for evidence of past life, on other planets but also show that a number of forms of microscopic life can adapt to conditions that scientists have long thought hostile to all but the hardiest bacteria.I hope that helps. If you have further questions, feel free to ask.
- Andrew