Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 1912:30 PM EST
-01:30 PM EST
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 2001:30 PM EST
-02:30 PM IST
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2407:00 PM PST
-08:00 PM PST
Full-length FE mock with insightful analytics, weakness diagnosis, and video explanations!
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
B
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
5%
(low)
Question Stats:
82% (01:19) correct
18%
(01:37)
wrong
based on 1813
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
By recording the noise of crinkled wrappers as they were slowly stretched out in an otherwise silent chamber, and then digitizing and analyzing the sound emissions on computers, a team of scientists found the noise not continuous but consisted of individual bursts or pops just thousandths of a second long.
(A) digitizing and analyzing the sound emissions on computers, a team of scientists found the noise not
(B) digitizing and analyzing the sound emissions on computers, a team of scientists found that the noise was not
(C) digitizing and analyzing the sound emissions on computers, a team of scientists found the noise not to be
(D) the sound emissions were digitized and analyzed on computers, a team of scientists found that the noise was not
(E) the sound emissions were digitized and analyzed on computers, a team of scientists found the noise not to be
(A) digitizing and analyzing the sound emissions on computers, a team of scientists found the noise not
(B) digitizing and analyzing the sound emissions on computers, a team of scientists found that the noise was not
(C) digitizing and analyzing the sound emissions on computers, a team of scientists found the noise not to be
(D) the sound emissions were digitized and analyzed on computers, a team of scientists found that the noise was not
(E) the sound emissions were digitized and analyzed on computers, a team of scientists found the noise not to be
Quote:
02 Jan 2015, 08:06
Kudos
Bookmarks
hi
this is my explanation:
By recording the noise of crinkled wrappers as they were slowly stretched out in an otherwise silent chamber, and then digitizing and analyzing the sound emissions on computers, a team of scientists found the noise not continuous but consisted of individual bursts or pops just thousandths of a second long.
let's understand the structure of the sentence:
-> By recording the noise of crinkled wrappers as they were slowly stretched out in an otherwise silent chamber (-ing modifier)
-> and then digitizing and analyzing the sound emissions on computers (another -ing modifier, which should be parallel to the first one)
these two modifiers modify the subject "a team of scientists"
3rd clause -> a team of scientists found the noise not continuous but consisted of individual bursts or pops just thousandths of a second long.
Now we can understand that a team of scientists found smth
they found that noise is consisted of bursts or pops ...
they found this by recording & then digitizing & analyzing the sound.
This sentence tests the correct use of modifiers, idioms, "be, being", and parallelism.
now let's get to POE:
(A) digitizing and analyzing the sound emissions on computers, a team of scientists found the noise not
the modifier is parallel to the first -ing modifier, both modifiers refer to "a team of scientists". Analysing the meaning, we see that a team of scientists found the noise. This is illogical! We need a that clause to introduce what they found. + not continuous but consisted - parallelism error
(B) digitizing and analyzing the sound emissions on computers, a team of scientists found that the noise was not
This is the correct answer. The second -ing modifier is parallel to the first one. Both of them refer to "a team of scientists". "That" correctly introduces a new clause which explains what the team has found. Moreover, the idiom "not x but y" is correctly used: was not continuous but consisted.
(C) digitizing and analyzing the sound emissions on computers, a team of scientists found the noise not to be
the modifier is parallel to the first -ing modifier. A team of scientists found.. found what? the noise? this is illogical, we need to introduce a new clause to explain what the team has found. Using the "not to be" is awkward, furthermore it is not parallel with "but consisted", which is not in the underlined portion.
(D) the sound emissions were digitized and analyzed on computers, a team of scientists found that the noise was not
the modifier is not parallel to the first modifier, which is an -ing one, hence the answer choice is incorrect.
(E) the sound emissions were digitized and analyzed on computers, a team of scientists found the noise not to be
same error as in answer choice D.
this is my explanation:
By recording the noise of crinkled wrappers as they were slowly stretched out in an otherwise silent chamber, and then digitizing and analyzing the sound emissions on computers, a team of scientists found the noise not continuous but consisted of individual bursts or pops just thousandths of a second long.
let's understand the structure of the sentence:
-> By recording the noise of crinkled wrappers as they were slowly stretched out in an otherwise silent chamber (-ing modifier)
-> and then digitizing and analyzing the sound emissions on computers (another -ing modifier, which should be parallel to the first one)
these two modifiers modify the subject "a team of scientists"
3rd clause -> a team of scientists found the noise not continuous but consisted of individual bursts or pops just thousandths of a second long.
Now we can understand that a team of scientists found smth
they found that noise is consisted of bursts or pops ...
they found this by recording & then digitizing & analyzing the sound.
This sentence tests the correct use of modifiers, idioms, "be, being", and parallelism.
now let's get to POE:
(A) digitizing and analyzing the sound emissions on computers, a team of scientists found the noise not
the modifier is parallel to the first -ing modifier, both modifiers refer to "a team of scientists". Analysing the meaning, we see that a team of scientists found the noise. This is illogical! We need a that clause to introduce what they found. + not continuous but consisted - parallelism error
(B) digitizing and analyzing the sound emissions on computers, a team of scientists found that the noise was not
This is the correct answer. The second -ing modifier is parallel to the first one. Both of them refer to "a team of scientists". "That" correctly introduces a new clause which explains what the team has found. Moreover, the idiom "not x but y" is correctly used: was not continuous but consisted.
(C) digitizing and analyzing the sound emissions on computers, a team of scientists found the noise not to be
the modifier is parallel to the first -ing modifier. A team of scientists found.. found what? the noise? this is illogical, we need to introduce a new clause to explain what the team has found. Using the "not to be" is awkward, furthermore it is not parallel with "but consisted", which is not in the underlined portion.
(D) the sound emissions were digitized and analyzed on computers, a team of scientists found that the noise was not
the modifier is not parallel to the first modifier, which is an -ing one, hence the answer choice is incorrect.
(E) the sound emissions were digitized and analyzed on computers, a team of scientists found the noise not to be
same error as in answer choice D.
General Discussion
21 Jul 2012, 20:48
Kudos
Bookmarks
In B found that is not parallel to but consisted
