jbharris88 wrote:
Arbitrageur wrote:
alienfluid wrote:
Interesting observation - personally I didn't. Unless someone has a job in Chicago, I'm not sure how a part-time MBA fits in.
It's definitely a bit awkward to weave into the essay, but for us Chicago residents I think it needs to be addressed. I think Chicago residents are fighting an uphill battle regardless.
Anecdotally, I have 2 friends who had applied full-time with competitive apps and were interviewed then denied FT but given the option to re-interview for the PT program. Both now attend PT.
Yikes. I had no idea it was tougher for Chicago people.
I just wrote 1-2 sentences on the full-time vs part-time.
I wouldn't expect the adcom to treat Chicago residents differently. Non-Chicago residents still have part-time schools available in the cities in which they live. So, making the case for full-time is important for them too. The only difference is that competitive Chicago residents who are rejected are likely pushed in the direction of the PT program since it is a viable option for them.
I didn't explicitly mention the full-time program but feel like the reasons I gave for "Why MBA" were benefits only the full-time program can offer. For example, any of the following reasons make the argument for full-time instead of part-time without your needing to call out the full-time program specifically:
(1) immersive business education with complimentary experiential opportunities
(2) study abroad to country x
(3) desire to change industries
I feel if your have a good answer to the "Why MBA" question, you'll likely already be answering the "Why full-time and not part-time" question. When the adcom sees these reasons, she will probably won't doubt your need for the full-time program. Of course, older applicants may need to be a bit more explicit, but even though I'm 31, I didn't feel the need.
It would be great to hear different experiences or perspectives.