whirlwind
Wow .. 63 pages! Looks like Kellogg is a hot favourite here!
What did I miss?

I am struggling with essay 3.
It says I have to evaluate my app from the perspective of a student member of the Adcom.
Does that mean I cannot provide any new information in this essay and have to comment on material presented elsewhere in the app?
If so, that would leave very little scope for me to talk about my application as *technically*,
I haven't even seen my LOR.
Would like to know how you guys are tackling this beast.
WW
I used this essay to tie my themes together and expand on items on my resume or background (that is already in my profile) that haven't been discussed in details elsewhere. The benefit here is that you can make the most straight-forward case for your candidacy, and draw evidence from what you have presented so far. btw I also wrote in first person.
I think the key here is to understand what "student committee member" is looking for, and focus on the qualities that make you a desirable classmate and link it with your potential contributions
Was split between writing in first vs. third person... to be honest, think the question could be interpreted either way and don't think it makes that much of a difference, as long as the content is nailed.